[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.8.0 (RC2)

[Márton Balassi]

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
0.8.0

This release will be the first major release for Flink as a top level
project.

-------------------------------------------------------------
The commit to be voted on is in the branch "release-0.8.0-rc2"
(commit 9ee74f3):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/9ee74f3

The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~mbalassi/flink-0.8.0-rc2/

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mbalassi.asc

The staging repository for this release can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1022
-------------------------------------------------------------


Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0.

The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

[Márton Balassi-3]

Dear Flinkers,

Please vote on our second release candidate if you can spare the time to
check it. The vote is open for less then 48 hours now.

Your release manager,

Marton

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> 0.8.0
>
> This release will be the first major release for Flink as a top level
> project.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> The commit to be voted on is in the branch "release-0.8.0-rc2"
> (commit 9ee74f3):
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/9ee74f3
>
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbalassi/flink-0.8.0-rc2/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mbalassi.asc
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1022
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>

[Stephan Ewen]

I am still traveling and could not yet run cluster tests, so I will delay
my final vote till tomorrow.

So far I can say:

- All files have valid headers

- License and notice files are good for source and binary release

- No binary executables in the released files

[Fabian Hueske]

Checked signatures and hashes for all tgz files, all OK.

Will do some tests tomorrow.

2015-01-13 23:17 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>:

> I am still traveling and could not yet run cluster tests, so I will delay
> my final vote till tomorrow.
>
> So far I can say:
>
> - All files have valid headers
>
> - License and notice files are good for source and binary release
>
> - No binary executables in the released files
>

[Henry Saputra]

Hi Marton,

Will verify the release artifacts later tonight.

I assume we have +1 from you?
You also need to explicitly cast your VOTE =)

- Henry

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Márton Balassi
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> 0.8.0
>
> This release will be the first major release for Flink as a top level
> project.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> The commit to be voted on is in the branch "release-0.8.0-rc2"
> (commit 9ee74f3):
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/9ee74f3
>
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbalassi/flink-0.8.0-rc2/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mbalassi.asc
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1022
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

[Ted Dunning]

Has anybody looked at NOTICE and similar files?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 13, 2015, at 14:17, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I am still traveling and could not yet run cluster tests, so I will delay
> my final vote till tomorrow.
>
> So far I can say:
>
> - All files have valid headers
>
> - License and notice files are good for source and binary release
>
> - No binary executables in the released files

[Ted Dunning]

Argh.  Some days I type faster than I read.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 13, 2015, at 14:17, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> License and notice files are good for source and binary release

[Márton Balassi]

Thanks Stephan, Fabian, Henry.
@Ted: Stephan did [1], I read through his updates while preparing the rc.

[1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/f360b07

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Ted Dunning <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Has anybody looked at NOTICE and similar files?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 13, 2015, at 14:17, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > I am still traveling and could not yet run cluster tests, so I will delay
> > my final vote till tomorrow.
> >
> > So far I can say:
> >
> > - All files have valid headers
> >
> > - License and notice files are good for source and binary release
> >
> > - No binary executables in the released files
>

[Robert Metzger]

+1

Checked:
- hadoop1 and hadoop2 profiles
- files in the lib/ directory
- deployed the flink-yarn version on google compute cloud (hadoop 2.4.1)
- set flink 0.8.0 as a repository in a flink project and build it from
these dependencies
- I ran some jobs on google compute cloud, with YARN.



On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Thanks Stephan, Fabian, Henry.
> @Ted: Stephan did [1], I read through his updates while preparing the rc.
>
> [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/f360b07
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Ted Dunning <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Has anybody looked at NOTICE and similar files?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Jan 13, 2015, at 14:17, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am still traveling and could not yet run cluster tests, so I will
> delay
> > > my final vote till tomorrow.
> > >
> > > So far I can say:
> > >
> > > - All files have valid headers
> > >
> > > - License and notice files are good for source and binary release
> > >
> > > - No binary executables in the released files
> >
>

[Aljoscha Krettek-2]

-1

The scala and the java quickstarts have dependencies on 0.9-SNAPSHOT versions.

Java Quickstart POM:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
<artifactId>flink-streaming-core</artifactId>
<version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
<artifactId>flink-streaming-connectors</artifactId>
<version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>

Scala Quickstart POM:
 <dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
<artifactId>flink-streaming-scala</artifactId>
<version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Márton Balassi
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks Stephan, Fabian, Henry.
> @Ted: Stephan did [1], I read through his updates while preparing the rc.
>
> [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/f360b07
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Ted Dunning <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Has anybody looked at NOTICE and similar files?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Jan 13, 2015, at 14:17, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I am still traveling and could not yet run cluster tests, so I will delay
>> > my final vote till tomorrow.
>> >
>> > So far I can say:
>> >
>> > - All files have valid headers
>> >
>> > - License and notice files are good for source and binary release
>> >
>> > - No binary executables in the released files
>>

[Márton Balassi-3]

Hey Aljoscha,

Thanks for spotting it. It looks like I still have to learn about mvn
archetype. Fixed in [1], this 0.8-SNAPSHOT is replaced by 0.8.0 in the
release commit.

[1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/b58a0aa

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> -1
>
> The scala and the java quickstarts have dependencies on 0.9-SNAPSHOT
> versions.
>
> Java Quickstart POM:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
> <artifactId>flink-streaming-core</artifactId>
> <version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
> <artifactId>flink-streaming-connectors</artifactId>
> <version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
>
> Scala Quickstart POM:
>  <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
> <artifactId>flink-streaming-scala</artifactId>
> <version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Márton Balassi
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Thanks Stephan, Fabian, Henry.
> > @Ted: Stephan did [1], I read through his updates while preparing the rc.
> >
> > [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/f360b07
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Ted Dunning <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Has anybody looked at NOTICE and similar files?
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> > On Jan 13, 2015, at 14:17, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I am still traveling and could not yet run cluster tests, so I will
> delay
> >> > my final vote till tomorrow.
> >> >
> >> > So far I can say:
> >> >
> >> > - All files have valid headers
> >> >
> >> > - License and notice files are good for source and binary release
> >> >
> >> > - No binary executables in the released files
> >>
>

[Stephan Ewen]

I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release votes
are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.

Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be minimal.

[Henry Saputra]

Yes, we need new RC.

Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.

- H

On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release votes
> are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
>
> Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be minimal.
>

[Márton Balassi-3]

Hey guys,

Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also bump
the inception year in the pom. [1]

By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:

Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
Or
Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation

I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.

[1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
[2]
https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
[3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE

The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Yes, we need new RC.
>
> Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
>
> - H
>
> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release votes
> > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
> >
> > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
> minimal.
> >
>

[Márton Balassi-3]

The NOTICE alternatives are 2015 or 2014-2015, sorry for the typo.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also
> bump the inception year in the pom. [1]
>
> By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
>
> Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> Or
> Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
>
> The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, we need new RC.
>>
>> Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
>>
>> - H
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release votes
>> > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
>> > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
>> >
>> > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
>> minimal.
>> >
>>
>
>

[Henry Saputra]

We need to use 2014-2015 [1]

[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html

On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also bump
> the inception year in the pom. [1]
>
> By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
>
> Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> Or
> Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> [2]
>
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
>
> The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, we need new RC.
> >
> > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> >
> > - H
> >
> > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release
> votes
> > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
> > >
> > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
> > minimal.
> > >
> >
>

[Stephan Ewen]

Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files (directory
root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <[hidden email]>:

> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
>
> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also
> bump
> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
> >
> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
> >
> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> > Or
> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> >
> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
> >
> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, we need new RC.
> > >
> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> > >
> > > - H
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release
> > votes
> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
> > > >
> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
> > > minimal.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Henry Saputra]

Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
believe the content is exactly the same.

- Henry

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files (directory
> root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
> Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <[hidden email]>:
>
>> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also
>> bump
>> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
>> >
>> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
>> >
>> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
>> > Or
>> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>> >
>> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
>> > [2]
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
>> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
>> >
>> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
>> > <javascript:;>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yes, we need new RC.
>> > >
>> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
>> > >
>> > > - H
>> > >
>> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
>> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release
>> > votes
>> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
>> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
>> > > >
>> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
>> > > minimal.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

[Robert Metzger]

Yes, there are two NOTICE files.
They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing
notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
> believe the content is exactly the same.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files
> (directory
> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey guys,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also
> >> bump
> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
> >> >
> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
> >> >
> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> >> > Or
> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> >> >
> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> >> > [2]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
> >> >
> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <
> [hidden email]
> >> > <javascript:;>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Yes, we need new RC.
> >> > >
> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> >> > >
> >> > > - H
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release
> >> > votes
> >> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
> >> > > minimal.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

[Henry Saputra]

Hi Robert, yes you are right. Totally forgot about packaging the binaries.

- Henry

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes, there are two NOTICE files.
> They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing
> notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
>> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
>> believe the content is exactly the same.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files
>> (directory
>> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
>> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <[hidden email]>:
>> >
>> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
>> >>
>> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hey guys,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also
>> >> bump
>> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
>> >> >
>> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
>> >> >
>> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
>> >> > Or
>> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>> >> >
>> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
>> >> > [2]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
>> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
>> >> >
>> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> [hidden email]
>> >> > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Yes, we need new RC.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > - H
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
>> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because release
>> >> > votes
>> >> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
>> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another vote.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will be
>> >> > > minimal.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>