[VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Chesnay Schepler-3
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
1.5.1, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)


The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
be deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
* website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
blog post [6].

This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The minimum
voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.

Thanks,
Chesnay

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343053
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171
[5]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
[6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

vino yang
+1
reviewed [1], [4] and [6]

2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:

> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 1.5.1,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> blog post [6].
>
> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The minimum
> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Chesnay
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171
> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
>
>
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Yaz Sh
-1

./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages


Cheers,
Yazdan

> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +1
> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>
> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 1.5.1,
>> as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
>> blog post [6].
>>
>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The minimum
>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chesnay
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171
>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Chesnay Schepler-3
@Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the hadoop-free
package and the folder is there.

Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?

On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:

> -1
>
> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
>
>
> Cheers,
> Yazdan
>
>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>>
>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 1.5.1,
>>> as follows:
>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>>
>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
>>> blog post [6].
>>>
>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The minimum
>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chesnay
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171
>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Chesnay Schepler-3
oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...

On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:

> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the hadoop-free
> package and the folder is there.
>
> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
>
> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Yazdan
>>
>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>>>
>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
>>>> 1.5.1,
>>>> as follows:
>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> includes:
>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>> releases to be
>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
>>>> blog post [6].
>>>>
>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
>>>> minimum
>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Chesnay
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>> [4]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171
>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Chesnay Schepler-3
Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.

I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built modules
that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However flink-dist depends
on neither flink-examples-batch nor flink-examples-streaming, yet
happily accesses their target directory. The existing build process only
worked since _by chance_ these 2 modules are built before flink-dist
when doing a complete build.

I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC for
this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.

On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:

> oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
>
> On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
>> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
>>
>> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
>>
>> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
>>> -1
>>>
>>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Yazdan
>>>
>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>>>>
>>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
>>>>> 1.5.1,
>>>>> as follows:
>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>> includes:
>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>>> releases to be
>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>>> announcement
>>>>> blog post [6].
>>>>>
>>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
>>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
>>>>> minimum
>>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Chesnay
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>> [4]
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 
>>>>>
>>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
>>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Chesnay Schepler-3
I have rebuilt the binary release packages, they should now contain all
examples.

On 11.07.2018 09:49, Chesnay Schepler wrote:

> Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.
>
> I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built
> modules that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However
> flink-dist depends on neither flink-examples-batch nor
> flink-examples-streaming, yet happily accesses their target directory.
> The existing build process only worked since _by chance_ these 2
> modules are built before flink-dist when doing a complete build.
>
> I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC
> for this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.
>
> On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
>>
>> On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
>>> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
>>>
>>> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
>>>
>>> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Yazdan
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
>>>>>> version 1.5.1,
>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>>>> releases to be
>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>>>> announcement
>>>>>> blog post [6].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
>>>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
>>>>>> minimum
>>>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Chesnay
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
>>>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Chesnay Schepler-3
+1

* verified that the binary packages contained streaming examples
* started local cluster without exceptions in the logs
* ran multiple streaming examples

On 11.07.2018 16:51, Chesnay Schepler wrote:

> I have rebuilt the binary release packages, they should now contain
> all examples.
>
> On 11.07.2018 09:49, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.
>>
>> I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built
>> modules that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However
>> flink-dist depends on neither flink-examples-batch nor
>> flink-examples-streaming, yet happily accesses their target
>> directory. The existing build process only worked since _by chance_
>> these 2 modules are built before flink-dist when doing a complete build.
>>
>> I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC
>> for this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.
>>
>> On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>> oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
>>>
>>> On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
>>>> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
>>>>
>>>> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
>>>>
>>>> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Yazdan
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
>>>>>>> version 1.5.1,
>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>>>>> releases to be
>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>>>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>>>>> announcement
>>>>>>> blog post [6].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with
>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
>>>>>>> minimum
>>>>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Chesnay
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
>>>>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Till Rohrmann
In reply to this post by Chesnay Schepler-3
+1 (binding)

- Verified the signatures of all binary artifacts
- Verified that no new dependencies were added for which the LICENSE and
NOTICE files need to be adapted.
- Build 1.5.1 from the source artifact
- Run flink-end-to-end tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.7 binary
artifact
- Run Jepsen tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.8 binary artifact

Cheers,
Till


On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:49 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.
>
> I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built modules
> that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However flink-dist depends
> on neither flink-examples-batch nor flink-examples-streaming, yet
> happily accesses their target directory. The existing build process only
> worked since _by chance_ these 2 modules are built before flink-dist
> when doing a complete build.
>
> I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC for
> this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.
>
> On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
> >
> > On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> >> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
> >> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
> >>
> >> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
> >>
> >> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
> >>> -1
> >>>
> >>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Yazdan
> >>>
> >>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
> >>>>
> >>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
> >>>>> 1.5.1,
> >>>>> as follows:
> >>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>>>> includes:
> >>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> >>>>> releases to be
> >>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> >>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
> >>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
> >>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >>>>> announcement
> >>>>> blog post [6].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
> >>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
> >>>>> minimum
> >>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
> >>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Chesnay
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> >>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
> >>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/
> >>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>> [4]
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
> >>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
> >>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Yaz Sh
+1

- Verified the signatures for all binary artifacts
- Verifies Checksum for all binary packages
- Ran local cluster with no error on logs and empty *.out
- Stop local cluster  with no error on logs
- Ran multiple batch and streaming example via WebUI
- Rab multiple batch and streaming examples via CLI
- Increase number of task managers and ran examples with Parallelism > 1
- Ran WebUI on multiple browsers
- Check Example folder for all binary packages

Just an observation:
When ran a job with Parallelism > Available task slots intermediately job stay in “Running" status for a very long time and neither finish nor throw any errors.

Please check if someone else can reproduce it.

Cheers,
Yazdan


> On Jul 11, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified the signatures of all binary artifacts
> - Verified that no new dependencies were added for which the LICENSE and NOTICE files need to be adapted.
> - Build 1.5.1 from the source artifact
> - Run flink-end-to-end tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.7 binary artifact
> - Run Jepsen tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.8 binary artifact
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:49 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.
>
> I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built modules
> that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However flink-dist depends
> on neither flink-examples-batch nor flink-examples-streaming, yet
> happily accesses their target directory. The existing build process only
> worked since _by chance_ these 2 modules are built before flink-dist
> when doing a complete build.
>
> I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC for
> this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.
>
> On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
> >
> > On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> >> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
> >> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
> >>
> >> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
> >>
> >> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
> >>> -1
> >>>
> >>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Yazdan
> >>>
> >>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
> >>>>
> >>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
> >>>>> 1.5.1,
> >>>>> as follows:
> >>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>>>> includes:
> >>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> >>>>> releases to be
> >>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which are signed with the key with
> >>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
> >>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
> >>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >>>>> announcement
> >>>>> blog post [6].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with most
> >>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
> >>>>> minimum
> >>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
> >>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Chesnay
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje>
> >>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
> >>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/>
> >>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> >>>>> [4]
> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h= <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=>
> >>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
> >>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112 <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Till Rohrmann
Hi Yazdan,

that is the expected behaviour. If the system cannot allocate enough slots
it will fail with a NoResourceAvailableException after
the slot.request.timeout has been exceeded.

Cheers,
Till

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM Yaz Sh <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> - Verified the signatures for all binary artifacts
> - Verifies Checksum for all binary packages
> - Ran local cluster with no error on logs and empty *.out
> - Stop local cluster  with no error on logs
> - Ran multiple batch and streaming example via WebUI
> - Rab multiple batch and streaming examples via CLI
> - Increase number of task managers and ran examples with Parallelism > 1
> - Ran WebUI on multiple browsers
> - Check Example folder for all binary packages
>
> Just an observation:
> When ran a job with Parallelism > Available task slots intermediately job
> stay in “Running" status for a very long time and neither finish nor throw
> any errors.
>
> Please check if someone else can reproduce it.
>
> Cheers,
> Yazdan
>
>
> > On Jul 11, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Verified the signatures of all binary artifacts
> > - Verified that no new dependencies were added for which the LICENSE and
> NOTICE files need to be adapted.
> > - Build 1.5.1 from the source artifact
> > - Run flink-end-to-end tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.7
> binary artifact
> > - Run Jepsen tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.8 binary artifact
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:49 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.
> >
> > I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built modules
> > that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However flink-dist depends
> > on neither flink-examples-batch nor flink-examples-streaming, yet
> > happily accesses their target directory. The existing build process only
> > worked since _by chance_ these 2 modules are built before flink-dist
> > when doing a complete build.
> >
> > I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC for
> > this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.
> >
> > On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > > oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
> > >
> > > On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > >> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
> > >> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
> > >>
> > >> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
> > >>
> > >> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
> > >>> -1
> > >>>
> > >>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Yazdan
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
> > >>>>> 1.5.1,
> > >>>>> as follows:
> > >>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > >>>>> includes:
> > >>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > >>>>> releases to be
> > >>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which
> are signed with the key with
> > >>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
> > >>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > >>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
> > >>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > >>>>> announcement
> > >>>>> blog post [6].
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with
> most
> > >>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
> > >>>>> minimum
> > >>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
> > >>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Chesnay
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje>
> > >>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
> > >>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/>
> > >>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> > >>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h= <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=>
> > >>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
> > >>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112 <
> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Aljoscha Krettek-2
+1 (binding)

- verified again the signatures and hashes

> On 12. Jul 2018, at 09:54, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Yazdan,
>
> that is the expected behaviour. If the system cannot allocate enough slots
> it will fail with a NoResourceAvailableException after
> the slot.request.timeout has been exceeded.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM Yaz Sh <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> - Verified the signatures for all binary artifacts
>> - Verifies Checksum for all binary packages
>> - Ran local cluster with no error on logs and empty *.out
>> - Stop local cluster  with no error on logs
>> - Ran multiple batch and streaming example via WebUI
>> - Rab multiple batch and streaming examples via CLI
>> - Increase number of task managers and ran examples with Parallelism > 1
>> - Ran WebUI on multiple browsers
>> - Check Example folder for all binary packages
>>
>> Just an observation:
>> When ran a job with Parallelism > Available task slots intermediately job
>> stay in “Running" status for a very long time and neither finish nor throw
>> any errors.
>>
>> Please check if someone else can reproduce it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Yazdan
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 11, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> - Verified the signatures of all binary artifacts
>>> - Verified that no new dependencies were added for which the LICENSE and
>> NOTICE files need to be adapted.
>>> - Build 1.5.1 from the source artifact
>>> - Run flink-end-to-end tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.7
>> binary artifact
>>> - Run Jepsen tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.8 binary artifact
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:49 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.
>>>
>>> I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built modules
>>> that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However flink-dist depends
>>> on neither flink-examples-batch nor flink-examples-streaming, yet
>>> happily accesses their target directory. The existing build process only
>>> worked since _by chance_ these 2 modules are built before flink-dist
>>> when doing a complete build.
>>>
>>> I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC for
>>> this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.
>>>
>>> On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>> oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
>>>>
>>>> On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>>> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
>>>>> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Yazdan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
>>>>>>>> 1.5.1,
>>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> comments)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>>>>>> releases to be
>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which
>> are signed with the key with
>>>>>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>>>>>> announcement
>>>>>>>> blog post [6].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with
>> most
>>>>>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
>>>>>>>> minimum
>>>>>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Chesnay
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje>
>>>>>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/>
>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h= <
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=>
>>>>>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112 <
>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1, release candidate #3

Yaz Sh
In reply to this post by Till Rohrmann
Hi Till,

Thanks for reply!

For version 1.4.x when Parallelism > Available task Slots has been selected, Flink throw bellow error immediately as you said

NoResourceAvailableException: Not enough free slots available to run the job
 
but for version 1.5.x there are two different behaviors: Sometimes job ran successfully and sometimes it throw error after 5 minutes with this message:

org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmanager.scheduler.NoResourceAvailableException: Could not allocate all requires slots within timeout of 300000 ms. Slots required: 5, slots allocated: 2


I think it might be a bug and created this ticket to keep track of it
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9848 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9848>

Please let me know if you think otherwise.


Cheers,
Yazdan

> On Jul 12, 2018, at 3:54 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Yazdan,
>
> that is the expected behaviour. If the system cannot allocate enough slots
> it will fail with a NoResourceAvailableException after
> the slot.request.timeout has been exceeded.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM Yaz Sh <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> - Verified the signatures for all binary artifacts
>> - Verifies Checksum for all binary packages
>> - Ran local cluster with no error on logs and empty *.out
>> - Stop local cluster  with no error on logs
>> - Ran multiple batch and streaming example via WebUI
>> - Rab multiple batch and streaming examples via CLI
>> - Increase number of task managers and ran examples with Parallelism > 1
>> - Ran WebUI on multiple browsers
>> - Check Example folder for all binary packages
>>
>> Just an observation:
>> When ran a job with Parallelism > Available task slots intermediately job
>> stay in “Running" status for a very long time and neither finish nor throw
>> any errors.
>>
>> Please check if someone else can reproduce it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Yazdan
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 11, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> - Verified the signatures of all binary artifacts
>>> - Verified that no new dependencies were added for which the LICENSE and
>> NOTICE files need to be adapted.
>>> - Build 1.5.1 from the source artifact
>>> - Run flink-end-to-end tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.7
>> binary artifact
>>> - Run Jepsen tests for 12 hours for the 1.5.1 Hadoop 2.8 binary artifact
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:49 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>> Correction on my part, it does affect all packages.
>>>
>>> I've also found the cause. To speed up the process I only built modules
>>> that flink-dist depends on (see FLINK-9768). However flink-dist depends
>>> on neither flink-examples-batch nor flink-examples-streaming, yet
>>> happily accesses their target directory. The existing build process only
>>> worked since _by chance_ these 2 modules are built before flink-dist
>>> when doing a complete build.
>>>
>>> I will rebuild the binaries (I don't think we have to cancel the RC for
>>> this) and open a JIRA to fix the dependencies.
>>>
>>> On 11.07.2018 09:27, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>> oh, the packages that include hadoop are really missing it...
>>>>
>>>> On 11.07.2018 09:25, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>>> @Yaz which binary package did you check? I looked into the
>>>>> hadoop-free package and the folder is there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you maybe encounter an error when extracting the package?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11.07.2018 05:44, Yaz Sh wrote:
>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./examples/streaming folder is missing in binary packages
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Yazdan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:57 PM, vino yang <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> <mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> reviewed [1], [4] and [6]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2018-07-11 3:10 GMT+08:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> <mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
>>>>>>>> 1.5.1,
>>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> comments)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>>>>>> releases to be
>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> <http://dist.apache.org/ <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2], which
>> are signed with the key with
>>>>>>>> fingerprint 11D464BA [3],
>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.5.1-rc3" [5],
>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>>>>>> announcement
>>>>>>>> blog post [6].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This RC is a slightly modified version of the previous RC, with
>> most
>>>>>>>> release testing being applicable to both release candidates. The
>>>>>>>> minimum
>>>>>>>> voting duration will hence be reduced to 24 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Chesnay
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje>>
>>>>>>>> ctId=12315522&version=12343053
>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/> <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/1.5.1/>>
>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS> <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>>
>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171 <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1171>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h= <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=> <
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h= <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=>>
>>>>>>>> refs/tags/release-1.5.1-rc3
>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112 <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112> <
>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112 <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/112>>