Dear community,
with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and binary compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases [1] I would like to start a vote about it. The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible across bug fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. The voting options are the following: * +1, Provide the above described guarantees * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide specific comments) The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E Cheers, Till |
+1
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dear community, > > with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and binary > compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases [1] I > would like to start a vote about it. > > The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible across bug > fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version x.y.u is > API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving > classes. > > The voting options are the following: > > * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > specific comments) > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > Cheers, > Till > |
+1 (non-binding)
Best, Jingsong Lee On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:26 PM Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Dear community, > > > > with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and binary > > compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases [1] I > > would like to start a vote about it. > > > > The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible across bug > > fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version x.y.u > is > > API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving > > classes. > > > > The voting options are the following: > > > > * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > > specific comments) > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > > approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > [1] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > -- Best, Jingsong Lee |
In reply to this post by Thomas Weise
Sounds good, +1.
Best, Zhijiang ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 To:dev <[hidden email]> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) +1 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dear community, > > with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and binary > compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases [1] I > would like to start a vote about it. > > The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible across bug > fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version x.y.u is > API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving > classes. > > The voting options are the following: > > * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > specific comments) > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > Cheers, > Till > |
+1
– Ufuk On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email]> wrote: > Sounds good, +1. > > Best, > Zhijiang > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > To:dev <[hidden email]> > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > +1 > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Dear community, > > > > with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and binary > > compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases [1] I > > would like to start a vote about it. > > > > The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible across bug > > fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version x.y.u > is > > API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving > > classes. > > > > The voting options are the following: > > > > * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > > specific comments) > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > > approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > [1] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > |
+1
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > – Ufuk > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email] > .invalid> > wrote: > > > Sounds good, +1. > > > > Best, > > Zhijiang > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > To:dev <[hidden email]> > > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > > binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear community, > > > > > > with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and binary > > > compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases [1] I > > > would like to start a vote about it. > > > > > > The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > > that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible across > bug > > > fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version x.y.u > > is > > > API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving > > > classes. > > > > > > The voting options are the following: > > > > > > * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > > * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > > > specific comments) > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > > > approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Till > > > > > > > > |
+1
Best, Yangze Guo On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email] > > .invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Sounds good, +1. > > > > > > Best, > > > Zhijiang > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > > Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > > To:dev <[hidden email]> > > > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > > > binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear community, > > > > > > > > with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and binary > > > > compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases [1] I > > > > would like to start a vote about it. > > > > > > > > The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > > > that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible across > > bug > > > > fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version x.y.u > > > is > > > > API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving > > > > classes. > > > > > > > > The voting options are the following: > > > > > > > > * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > > > * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > > > > specific comments) > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > > > > approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > > > |
+1 (non-binding)
Best, Congxian Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > +1 > > Best, > Yangze Guo > > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email] > > > .invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Sounds good, +1. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Zhijiang > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > > > Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > > > To:dev <[hidden email]> > > > > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > > > > binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear community, > > > > > > > > > > with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > binary > > > > > compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases > [1] I > > > > > would like to start a vote about it. > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > > > > that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > across > > > bug > > > > > fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version > x.y.u > > > > is > > > > > API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > @PublicEvolving > > > > > classes. > > > > > > > > > > The voting options are the following: > > > > > > > > > > * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > > > > * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > > > > > specific comments) > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > majority > > > > > approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
+1 (non-binding)
Regards, Dian > 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > +1 (non-binding) > Best, > Congxian > > > Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > >> +1 >> >> Best, >> Yangze Guo >> >> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> – Ufuk >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email] >>>> .invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sounds good, +1. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Zhijiang >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> >>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 >>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> >>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and >>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear community, >>>>>> >>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and >> binary >>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases >> [1] I >>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee >>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible >> across >>>> bug >>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version >> x.y.u >>>>> is >>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all >> @PublicEvolving >>>>>> classes. >>>>>> >>>>>> The voting options are the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees >>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide >>>>>> specific comments) >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >> majority >>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Till >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> |
Definitely +1
Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Dian > > > 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > > Congxian > > > > > > Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Best, > >> Yangze Guo > >> > >> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> – Ufuk > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email] > >>>> .invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Sounds good, +1. > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Zhijiang > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > >>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > >>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > >>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > >>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Dear community, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > >> binary > >>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases > >> [1] I > >>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > >>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > >> across > >>>> bug > >>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version > >> x.y.u > >>>>> is > >>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > >> @PublicEvolving > >>>>>> classes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The voting options are the following: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > >>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please provide > >>>>>> specific comments) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > >> majority > >>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Till > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang |
+1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a
development-oriented vote?) Minor: bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead of forward? Thanks. Best Regards, Yu On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: > Definitely +1 > > Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Regards, > > Dian > > > > > 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > Best, > > > Congxian > > > > > > > > > Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Yangze Guo > > >> > > >> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> – Ufuk > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > [hidden email] > > >>>> .invalid> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Sounds good, +1. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best, > > >>>>> Zhijiang > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > >>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > >>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > > >>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API > and > > >>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > [hidden email]> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Dear community, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > > >> binary > > >>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases > > >> [1] I > > >>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > >>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > > >> across > > >>>> bug > > >>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version > > >> x.y.u > > >>>>> is > > >>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > > >> @PublicEvolving > > >>>>>> classes. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The voting options are the following: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > >>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > provide > > >>>>>> specific comments) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > > >> majority > > >>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>> Till > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > |
+1
Piotrek > On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > development-oriented vote?) > > Minor: > bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to x.y.v > with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead of > forward? > > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Definitely +1 >> >> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dian >>> >>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> Best, >>>> Congxian >>>> >>>> >>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Yangze Guo >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> – Ufuk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < >> [hidden email] >>>>>>> .invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Zhijiang >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 >>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API >> and >>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < >> [hidden email]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear community, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and >>>>> binary >>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases >>>>> [1] I >>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee >>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible >>>>> across >>>>>>> bug >>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version >>>>> x.y.u >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all >>>>> @PublicEvolving >>>>>>>>> classes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees >>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please >> provide >>>>>>>>> specific comments) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >>>>> majority >>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Best Regards >> >> Jeff Zhang >> |
+1 (non-binding)
Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: > +1 > > Piotrek > > > On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > > development-oriented vote?) > > > > Minor: > > bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to x.y.v > > with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead of > > forward? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > > > On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> Definitely +1 > >> > >> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Dian > >>> > >>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>> Best, > >>>> Congxian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Yangze Guo > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> – Ufuk > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > >> [hidden email] > >>>>>>> .invalid> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Zhijiang > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > >>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > >>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > >>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API > >> and > >>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > >> [hidden email]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear community, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > >>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases > >>>>> [1] I > >>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > >>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > >>>>> across > >>>>>>> bug > >>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version > >>>>> x.y.u > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > >>>>> @PublicEvolving > >>>>>>>>> classes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > >>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > >> provide > >>>>>>>>> specific comments) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > >>>>> majority > >>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards > >> > >> Jeff Zhang > >> > > -- Benchao Li School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University Tel:+86-15650713730 Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] |
+1 (non-binding) Yun Tang ________________________________ From: Benchao Li <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 To: dev <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) +1 (non-binding) Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: > +1 > > Piotrek > > > On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > > development-oriented vote?) > > > > Minor: > > bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to x.y.v > > with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead of > > forward? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > > > On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> Definitely +1 > >> > >> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Dian > >>> > >>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>> Best, > >>>> Congxian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Yangze Guo > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> �C Ufuk > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > >> [hidden email] > >>>>>>> .invalid> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Zhijiang > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > >>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > >>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > >>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API > >> and > >>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > >> [hidden email]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear community, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > >>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix releases > >>>>> [1] I > >>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > >>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > >>>>> across > >>>>>>> bug > >>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a version > >>>>> x.y.u > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > >>>>> @PublicEvolving > >>>>>>>>> classes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > >>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > >> provide > >>>>>>>>> specific comments) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > >>>>> majority > >>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards > >> > >> Jeff Zhang > >> > > -- Benchao Li School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University Tel:+86-15650713730 Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] |
+1
Thanks, Zhu Zhu Yun Tang <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Yun Tang > ________________________________ > From: Benchao Li <[hidden email]> > Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 > To: dev <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > +1 (non-binding) > > Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: > > > +1 > > > > Piotrek > > > > > On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > > > development-oriented vote?) > > > > > > Minor: > > > bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to > x.y.v > > > with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > > I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead > of > > > forward? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > >> Definitely +1 > > >> > > >> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > > >> > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Dian > > >>> > > >>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>> Best, > > >>>> Congxian > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best, > > >>>>> Yangze Guo > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> – Ufuk > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > > >> [hidden email] > > >>>>>>> .invalid> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>> Zhijiang > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > >>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > >>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > > >>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are > API > > >> and > > >>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > > >> [hidden email]> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > > >>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix > releases > > >>>>> [1] I > > >>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > >>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > > >>>>> across > > >>>>>>> bug > > >>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a > version > > >>>>> x.y.u > > >>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > > >>>>> @PublicEvolving > > >>>>>>>>> classes. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > >>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > > >> provide > > >>>>>>>>> specific comments) > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > > >>>>> majority > > >>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best Regards > > >> > > >> Jeff Zhang > > >> > > > > > > -- > > Benchao Li > School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University > Tel:+86-15650713730 > Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > |
+1 (non-binding)
Best, Leonard Xu > 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Zhu Zhu > > Yun Tang <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道: > >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Yun Tang >> ________________________________ >> From: Benchao Li <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 >> To: dev <[hidden email]> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Piotrek >>> >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a >>>> development-oriented vote?) >>>> >>>> Minor: >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to >> x.y.v >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead >> of >>>> forward? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Yu >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Definitely +1 >>>>> >>>>> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Dian >>>>>> >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Congxian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>>>>> .invalid> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are >> API >>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < >>>>> [hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and >>>>>>>> binary >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix >> releases >>>>>>>> [1] I >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible >>>>>>>> across >>>>>>>>>> bug >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a >> version >>>>>>>> x.y.u >>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving >>>>>>>>>>>> classes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please >>>>> provide >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >>>>>>>> majority >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards >>>>> >>>>> Jeff Zhang >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Benchao Li >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University >> Tel:+86-15650713730 >> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] >> |
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you~ Xintong Song On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Leonard Xu > > 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Zhu Zhu > > > > Yun Tang <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道: > > > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Yun Tang > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Benchao Li <[hidden email]> > >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 > >> To: dev <[hidden email]> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Piotrek > >>> > >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > >>>> development-oriented vote?) > >>>> > >>>> Minor: > >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to > >> x.y.v > >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility instead > >> of > >>>> forward? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Best Regards, > >>>> Yu > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Definitely +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Dian > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Congxian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei <[hidden email] > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > >>>>> [hidden email] > >>>>>>>>>> .invalid> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are > >> API > >>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > >>>>> [hidden email]> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API and > >>>>>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix > >> releases > >>>>>>>> [1] I > >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary compatible > >>>>>>>> across > >>>>>>>>>> bug > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a > >> version > >>>>>>>> x.y.u > >>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving > >>>>>>>>>>>> classes. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > >>>>> provide > >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > >>>>>>>> majority > >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Best Regards > >>>>> > >>>>> Jeff Zhang > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Benchao Li > >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking > University > >> Tel:+86-15650713730 > >> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > >> > > |
+1
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Leonard Xu > > > 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > Yun Tang <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道: > > > > > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> Yun Tang > > >> ________________________________ > > >> From: Benchao Li <[hidden email]> > > >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 > > >> To: dev <[hidden email]> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API and > > >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: > > >> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> Piotrek > > >>> > > >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this is a > > >>>> development-oriented vote?) > > >>>> > > >>>> Minor: > > >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible to > > >> x.y.v > > >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility > instead > > >> of > > >>>> forward? > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks. > > >>>> > > >>>> Best Regards, > > >>>> Yu > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Definitely +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>> Dian > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>> Congxian > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei < > [hidden email] > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > > >>>>> [hidden email] > > >>>>>>>>>> .invalid> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are > > >> API > > >>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > > >>>>> [hidden email]> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API > and > > >>>>>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix > > >> releases > > >>>>>>>> [1] I > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to guarantee > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary > compatible > > >>>>>>>> across > > >>>>>>>>>> bug > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a > > >> version > > >>>>>>>> x.y.u > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > > >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving > > >>>>>>>>>>>> classes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees (please > > >>>>> provide > > >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted > by > > >>>>>>>> majority > > >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Best Regards > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jeff Zhang > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> Benchao Li > > >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking > > University > > >> Tel:+86-15650713730 > > >> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > > >> > > > > > |
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:02 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Leonard Xu > > > > 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > > > Yun Tang <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > >> > > > >> Yun Tang > > > >> ________________________________ > > > >> From: Benchao Li <[hidden email]> > > > >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 > > > >> To: dev <[hidden email]> > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API > and > > > >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > > >> > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > >> > > > >> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 > > > >>> > > > >>> Piotrek > > > >>> > > > >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this > is a > > > >>>> development-oriented vote?) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Minor: > > > >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible > to > > > >> x.y.v > > > >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > > >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility > > instead > > > >> of > > > >>>> forward? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Best Regards, > > > >>>> Yu > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Definitely +1 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>> Dian > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>> Congxian > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei < > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email] > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > > > >>>>> [hidden email] > > > >>>>>>>>>> .invalid> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes > are > > > >> API > > > >>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > > > >>>>> [hidden email]> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing API > > and > > > >>>>>>>> binary > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix > > > >> releases > > > >>>>>>>> [1] I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to > guarantee > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary > > compatible > > > >>>>>>>> across > > > >>>>>>>>>> bug > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that a > > > >> version > > > >>>>>>>> x.y.u > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > > > >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> classes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees > (please > > > >>>>> provide > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted > > by > > > >>>>>>>> majority > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Best Regards > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Jeff Zhang > > > >>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> Benchao Li > > > >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking > > > University > > > >> Tel:+86-15650713730 > > > >> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > > > >> > > > > > > > > > |
+1 (non-binding)
Regards, Canbin Zheng Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月18日周一 下午4:40写道: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:02 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Thank you~ > > > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:58 AM Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Leonard Xu > > > > > 在 2020年5月17日,00:30,Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > > > > > Yun Tang <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午11:18写道: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > >> Yun Tang > > > > >> ________________________________ > > > > >> From: Benchao Li <[hidden email]> > > > > >> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 22:00 > > > > >> To: dev <[hidden email]> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes are API > > and > > > > >> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and x.y.v) > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > >> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午8:10写道: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Piotrek > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On 16 May 2020, at 13:21, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> +1 (not sure whether my vote is binding, I guess yes since this > > is a > > > > >>>> development-oriented vote?) > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Minor: > > > > >>>> bq. This means that a version x.y.u is API and binary compatible > > to > > > > >> x.y.v > > > > >>>> with u <= v wrt all @PublicEvolving classes. > > > > >>>> I guess you mean "with u *>* v" to keep backward compatibility > > > instead > > > > >> of > > > > >>>> forward? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Best Regards, > > > > >>>> Yu > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:40, Jeff Zhang <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Definitely +1 > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Dian Fu <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 下午5:48写道: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Regards, > > > > >>>>>> Dian > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> 在 2020年5月16日,下午2:33,Congxian Qiu <[hidden email]> > 写道: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >>>>>>> Best, > > > > >>>>>>> Congxian > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Yangze Guo <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月16日周六 上午12:51写道: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> +1 > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > > > >>>>>>>> Yangze Guo > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:26 AM Yuan Mei < > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:21 AM Ufuk Celebi < > [hidden email] > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:54 PM Zhijiang < > > > > >>>>> [hidden email] > > > > >>>>>>>>>> .invalid> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, +1. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> From:Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020年5月15日(星期五) 21:33 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Guarantee that @PublicEvolving classes > > are > > > > >> API > > > > >>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> binary compatible across bug fix releases (x.y.u and > x.y.v) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Till Rohrmann < > > > > >>>>> [hidden email]> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with reference to the dev ML thread about guaranteeing > API > > > and > > > > >>>>>>>> binary > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for @PublicEvolving classes across bug fix > > > > >> releases > > > > >>>>>>>> [1] I > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would like to start a vote about it. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is that the Flink community starts to > > guarantee > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that @PublicEvolving classes will be API and binary > > > compatible > > > > >>>>>>>> across > > > > >>>>>>>>>> bug > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix releases of the same minor version. This means that > a > > > > >> version > > > > >>>>>>>> x.y.u > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API and binary compatible to x.y.v with u <= v wrt all > > > > >>>>>>>> @PublicEvolving > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> classes. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The voting options are the following: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * +1, Provide the above described guarantees > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * -1, Do not provide the above described guarantees > > (please > > > > >>>>> provide > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is > adopted > > > by > > > > >>>>>>>> majority > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> approval with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb0d0f887b291a490ed3773352c90ddf5f11e3d882dc501e3b8cf0ed0%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> Best Regards > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Jeff Zhang > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> > > > > >> Benchao Li > > > > >> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking > > > > University > > > > >> Tel:+86-15650713730 > > > > >> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |