[VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
41 messages Options
123
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws

Becket Qin
Thanks for voting, Jincheng, Kostas and Marton!

By now the vote counts as following:

+1 (Binding): 16 (Aljoscha, Fabian, Kurt, Till, Timo, Max, Stephan, Gordon,
Robert, Ufuk, Chesnay, Shaoxuan, Henry, Jincheng, Kostas, Marton)
+0 (Binding): 1 (Thomas)

+1 (Non-Binding): 11 (Hequn, Vino, Piotr, Dawid, Xintong, Yu, Jingsong,
Yun, Jark, Biao, Becket)

There are 23 PMC members of Flink and we have received 16 binding +1s. The
binding +1s have reached 2/3 majority.

*The Flink bylaws proposal has passed!*

Thanks everyone for the discussion and voting!

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:16 PM Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:40 AM Kostas Tzoumas <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:29 PM jincheng sun <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Becket Qin <[hidden email]>于2019年8月22日 周四16:22写道:
>>>
>>> > Hi All, so far the votes count as following:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (Binding): 13 (Aljoscha, Fabian, Kurt, Till, Timo, Max, Stephan,
>>> > Gordon, Robert, Ufuk, Chesnay, Shaoxuan, Henry)
>>> > +0 (Binding): 1 (Thomas)
>>> >
>>> > +1 (Non-Binding): 10 (Hequn, Vino, Piotr, Dawid, Xintong, Yu, Jingsong,
>>> > Yun, Jark, Biao)
>>> >
>>> > Given that more than 6 days have passed and there are not sufficient
>>> +1s
>>> > to pass the vote. I am reaching out the the binding voters that have
>>> not
>>> > voted yet here.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > @Greg, @Gyula, @Kostas, @Alan, @jincheng, @Marton, @Sebastian,
>>> @Vasiliki, @Daniel
>>> >
>>> > Would you have time to check the Flink bylaws proposal and vote on it?
>>> The
>>> > bylaws wiki is following:
>>> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>>> >
>>> > We are following the 2/3 majority voting process. This is the first
>>> > attempt of reaching out to the PMCs that have not voted yet. We will
>>> make
>>> > another attempt after 7 days if the result of the vote is still not
>>> > determined by then.
>>> >
>>> > Also CCing private@ in case one did not setup the Apache email
>>> forwarding.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:03 AM Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Oh yeah,  +1 LGTM
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for working on this.
>>> >>
>>> >> - Henry
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 2:17 AM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Thomas, Henry and Stephan. I also
>>> >> think
>>> >> > the committers are supposed to be mature enough to know when a
>>> review on
>>> >> > their own patch is needed.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > @Henry, just want to confirm, are you +1 on the proposed bylaws?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:54 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > I see it somewhat similar to Henry.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Generally, all committers should go for a review by another
>>> committer,
>>> >> > > unless it is a trivial comment or style fix. I personally do that,
>>> >> even
>>> >> > > though being one of the committers that have been with the project
>>> >> > longest.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > For now, I was hoping though that we have a mature enough
>>> community
>>> >> that
>>> >> > > this "soft rule" is enough. Whenever possible, working based on
>>> trust
>>> >> > with
>>> >> > > soft processes beats working with hard processes. We can still
>>> revisit
>>> >> > this
>>> >> > > in case we see that it does not work out.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:21 PM Henry Saputra <
>>> >> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > One of the perks of being committers is be able to commit code
>>> >> without
>>> >> > > > asking from another committer. Having said that, I think we
>>> rely on
>>> >> > > > maturity of the committers to know when to ask for reviews and
>>> when
>>> >> to
>>> >> > > > commit directly.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > For example, if someone just change typos on comments or simple
>>> >> rename
>>> >> > of
>>> >> > > > internal variables, I think we could trust the committer to
>>> safely
>>> >> > commit
>>> >> > > > the changes. When the changes will have effect of changing or
>>> >> introduce
>>> >> > > new
>>> >> > > > flows of the code, that's when reviews are needed and strongly
>>> >> > > encouraged.
>>> >> > > > I think the balance is needed for this.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > PMCs have the ability and right to revert changes in source
>>> repo as
>>> >> > > > necessary.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > - Henry
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:23 PM Thomas Weise <[hidden email]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > > +0 (binding)
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > I don't think committers should be allowed to approve their
>>> own
>>> >> > > changes.
>>> >> > > > I
>>> >> > > > > would prefer if non-committer contributors can approve
>>> committer
>>> >> PRs
>>> >> > as
>>> >> > > > > that would encourage more participation in code review and
>>> >> ability to
>>> >> > > > > contribute.
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:02 PM Shaoxuan Wang <
>>> >> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > +1 (binding)
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 7:48 PM Chesnay Schepler <
>>> >> > [hidden email]
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > Although I think it would be a good idea to always cc
>>> >> > > > > > > [hidden email] when modifying bylaws, if
>>> anything
>>> >> to
>>> >> > > speed
>>> >> > > > > up
>>> >> > > > > > > the voting process.
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > On 16/08/2019 11:26, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > – Ufuk
>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:50 AM Biao Liu <
>>> >> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > >> Thanks for pushing this!
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
>>> >> > > > > > > >> Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > >> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 09:37, Jark Wu <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>> Best,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>> Jark
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 09:22, Kurt Young <
>>> >> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> +1 (binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Best,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Kurt
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:34 AM Yun Tang <
>>> >> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> But I have a minor question about "code change"
>>> action,
>>> >> for
>>> >> > > > those
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> "[hotfix]" github pull requests [1], the dev mailing
>>> >> list
>>> >> > > would
>>> >> > > > > not
>>> >> > > > > > > >> be
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> notified currently. I think we should change the
>>> >> > description
>>> >> > > of
>>> >> > > > > > this
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> action.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> [1]
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html#code-contribution-process
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Best
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Yun Tang
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> ________________________________
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> From: JingsongLee <[hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 23:56
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> To: dev <[hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks Becket.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> I've learned a lot from current bylaws.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Best,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Jingsong Lee
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> From:Yu Li <[hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Send Time:2019年8月13日(星期二) 17:48
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks for the efforts Becket!
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Best Regards,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Yu
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 16:09, Xintong Song <
>>> >> > > > > [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> Thank you~
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> Xintong Song
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:48 PM Robert Metzger <
>>> >> > > > > > > >> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:47 PM Becket Qin <
>>> >> > > > > [hidden email]
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for voting.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> For those who have already voted, just want to
>>> bring
>>> >> > this
>>> >> > > up
>>> >> > > > > to
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> your
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> attention that there is a minor clarification to
>>> the
>>> >> > > bylaws
>>> >> > > > > > > >> wiki
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> this
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> morning. The change is in bold format below:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> one +1 from a committer followed by a Lazy
>>> approval
>>> >> (not
>>> >> > > > > > > >> counting
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> vote
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> of the contributor), moving to lazy majority if
>>> a
>>> >> -1 is
>>> >> > > > > > > >>> received.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Note that this implies that committers can +1
>>> their
>>> >> own
>>> >> > > > > commits
>>> >> > > > > > > >>> and
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> merge
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> right away. *However, the committe**rs should
>>> use
>>> >> their
>>> >> > > > best
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> judgement
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> to
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> respect the components expertise and ongoing
>>> >> > development
>>> >> > > > > > > >> plan.*
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> This addition does not really change anything the
>>> >> bylaws
>>> >> > > > meant
>>> >> > > > > > > >> to
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> set.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> It
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> is simply a clarification. If anyone who have
>>> casted
>>> >> the
>>> >> > > > vote
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> objects,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> please feel free to withdraw the vote.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:29 PM Piotr Nowojski <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> +1
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 13 Aug 2019, at 13:22, vino yang <
>>> >> > > > [hidden email]
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
>>> >> > 于2019年8月13日周二
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> 下午6:32写道:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 12:31 PM Hequn Cheng <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! Good job.
>>> @Becket
>>> >> > Qin <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, Hequn
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:26 PM Stephan Ewen
>>> <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> [hidden email]
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Maximilian
>>> >> > Michels <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 It's good that we formalize this.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13.08.19 10:41, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the proposed bylaws.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for pushing this Becket!
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Fabian
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Mo., 12. Aug. 2019 um 16:31 Uhr schrieb
>>> >> Robert
>>> >> > > > > > > >>> Metzger
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I changed the permissions of the page.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:21 PM Till
>>> >> Rohrmann <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the proposal. Thanks a lot for
>>> >> driving
>>> >> > > this
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> discussion
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Becket!
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:02 PM Becket
>>> Qin <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a good suggestion. Will you
>>> help to
>>> >> > > change
>>> >> > > > > > > >> the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> permission
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page?
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:41 PM Robert
>>> >> > Metzger <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting the vote.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about putting a specific version
>>> in
>>> >> the
>>> >> > > wiki
>>> >> > > > > > > >> up
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> for
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> voting,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricting edit access to the page
>>> to the
>>> >> > PMC?
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were already two changes (very
>>> >> minor)
>>> >> > to
>>> >> > > > the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> page
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> since
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> started:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=120731026
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to restrict edit access to
>>> the
>>> >> > page.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:43 AM Timo
>>> >> > Walther <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the efforts you put
>>> into
>>> >> this
>>> >> > > for
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> documenting
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> how
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project operates.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timo
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 12.08.19 um 10:44 schrieb Aljoscha
>>> >> > Krettek:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11. Aug 2019, at 10:07, Becket
>>> Qin <
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to start a voting
>>> thread
>>> >> on
>>> >> > the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> project
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> bylaws
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aims to help the community
>>> coordinate
>>> >> more
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> smoothly.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Please
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bylaws
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki page below for details.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion thread is following:
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Flink-project-bylaws-td30409.html
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least
>>> 6
>>> >> days.
>>> >> > > PMC
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> members'
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> votes
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considered as binding. The vote
>>> >> requires
>>> >> > 2/3
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> majority
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> of
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1s to
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass.
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
123