Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.8.0 (RC2)

[Márton Balassi]

The decision of the vote is to cancel this package.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Robert, yes you are right. Totally forgot about packaging the binaries.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > Yes, there are two NOTICE files.
> > They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing
> > notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
> >> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
> >> believe the content is exactly the same.
> >>
> >> - Henry
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files
> >> (directory
> >> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
> >> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <[hidden email]
> >:
> >> >
> >> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hey guys,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and
> also
> >> >> bump
> >> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> >> >> > Or
> >> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> >> >> > [2]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> >> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <
> >> [hidden email]
> >> >> > <javascript:;>>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > Yes, we need new RC.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > - H
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
> >> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because
> release
> >> >> > votes
> >> >> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> >> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another
> vote.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change will
> be
> >> >> > > minimal.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
>

[Kostas Tzoumas-2]

Marton, can you forward the first message in this thread to dev@ adding
[CANCEL] to the subject to cancel this vote? I think you did the same for
RC1.

Kostas

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> The decision of the vote is to cancel this package.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Robert, yes you are right. Totally forgot about packaging the
> binaries.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, there are two NOTICE files.
> > > They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing
> > > notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <
> [hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
> > >> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
> > >> believe the content is exactly the same.
> > >>
> > >> - Henry
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files
> > >> (directory
> > >> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
> > >> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <
> [hidden email]
> > >:
> > >> >
> > >> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
> > >> >>
> > >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <
> [hidden email]>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Hey guys,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and
> > also
> > >> >> bump
> > >> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> > >> >> > Or
> > >> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015
> version.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> > >> >> > [2]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> > >> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >> >> > <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > Yes, we need new RC.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > - H
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
> > >> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because
> > release
> > >> >> > votes
> > >> >> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> > >> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another
> > vote.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change
> will
> > be
> > >> >> > > minimal.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>

[Márton Balassi]

The decision of the vote is to cancel this package.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> 0.8.0
>
> This release will be the first major release for Flink as a top level
> project.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> The commit to be voted on is in the branch "release-0.8.0-rc2"
> (commit 9ee74f3):
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/9ee74f3
>
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbalassi/flink-0.8.0-rc2/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mbalassi.asc
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1022
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.8.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>