Quickstart build - Fat Jar is empty

[Papp, Stefan]

Hi,


I am using

*         Apache Maven 3.3.1

*         Java version: 1.8.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation (64 Bit)

*         OS name: "windows 7"
Changes in the POM file were applied. Changing source and target version from 1.6 to 1.8 and uncommenting the part with lambda expressions.

I try to build the Quickstart project with mvn clean package. The build runs through, but the fat jar file(quickstart-0.1-flink-fat-jar.jar) only contains a manifest file. The file itself has 370 bytes,

Thank you!


Stefan Papp
Hadoop Consultant

Teradata GmbH
Mobile: [phone]
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
teradata.com<http://www.teradata.com/>

This e-mail is from Teradata Corporation and may contain information that is confidential or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute the e-mail or any attachments. Instead, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you.
Please consider the environment before printing.

[Robert Metzger]

Hello,

there is a known issue in the Flink 0.8-series that the Quickstart fat-jar
is empty.

Can you remove these lines:
<excludes>
      <exclude>org.apache.flink:*</exclude>
</excludes>

from the file:
/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/assembly/flink-fat-jar.xml.

The fat-jar will now become very fat (60MB+).
If that's an issue for you, I can give another workaround. (= changing the
groupid to something different than "org.apache.flink")

Sorry for the inconvenience. This will be fixed in the next release.


Regards,
Robert

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Papp, Stefan <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> I am using
>
> *         Apache Maven 3.3.1
>
> *         Java version: 1.8.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation (64 Bit)
>
> *         OS name: "windows 7"
> Changes in the POM file were applied. Changing source and target version
> from 1.6 to 1.8 and uncommenting the part with lambda expressions.
>
> I try to build the Quickstart project with mvn clean package. The build
> runs through, but the fat jar file(quickstart-0.1-flink-fat-jar.jar) only
> contains a manifest file. The file itself has 370 bytes,
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> Stefan Papp
> Hadoop Consultant
>
> Teradata GmbH
> Mobile: [phone]
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> teradata.com<http://www.teradata.com/>
>
> This e-mail is from Teradata Corporation and may contain information that
> is confidential or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, do
> not read, copy or distribute the e-mail or any attachments. Instead, please
> notify the sender and delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you.
> Please consider the environment before printing.
>
>

[Stephan Ewen]

Hello Stefan!

If you want to give the 0.9-SNAPSHOT version a try, it has a fix for your
problem.

Greetings,
Stephan



On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> there is a known issue in the Flink 0.8-series that the Quickstart fat-jar
> is empty.
>
> Can you remove these lines:
> <excludes>
>       <exclude>org.apache.flink:*</exclude>
> </excludes>
>
> from the file:
> /src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/assembly/flink-fat-jar.xml.
>
> The fat-jar will now become very fat (60MB+).
> If that's an issue for you, I can give another workaround. (= changing the
> groupid to something different than "org.apache.flink")
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience. This will be fixed in the next release.
>
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Papp, Stefan <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I am using
> >
> > *         Apache Maven 3.3.1
> >
> > *         Java version: 1.8.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation (64 Bit)
> >
> > *         OS name: "windows 7"
> > Changes in the POM file were applied. Changing source and target version
> > from 1.6 to 1.8 and uncommenting the part with lambda expressions.
> >
> > I try to build the Quickstart project with mvn clean package. The build
> > runs through, but the fat jar file(quickstart-0.1-flink-fat-jar.jar) only
> > contains a manifest file. The file itself has 370 bytes,
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> >
> > Stefan Papp
> > Hadoop Consultant
> >
> > Teradata GmbH
> > Mobile: [phone]
> > [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> > teradata.com<http://www.teradata.com/>
> >
> > This e-mail is from Teradata Corporation and may contain information that
> > is confidential or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, do
> > not read, copy or distribute the e-mail or any attachments. Instead,
> please
> > notify the sender and delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you.
> > Please consider the environment before printing.
> >
> >
>

[Henry Saputra]

Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix this, Robert?

- Henry

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> there is a known issue in the Flink 0.8-series that the Quickstart fat-jar
> is empty.
>
> Can you remove these lines:
> <excludes>
>       <exclude>org.apache.flink:*</exclude>
> </excludes>
>
> from the file:
> /src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/assembly/flink-fat-jar.xml.
>
> The fat-jar will now become very fat (60MB+).
> If that's an issue for you, I can give another workaround. (= changing the
> groupid to something different than "org.apache.flink")
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience. This will be fixed in the next release.
>
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Papp, Stefan <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I am using
>>
>> *         Apache Maven 3.3.1
>>
>> *         Java version: 1.8.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation (64 Bit)
>>
>> *         OS name: "windows 7"
>> Changes in the POM file were applied. Changing source and target version
>> from 1.6 to 1.8 and uncommenting the part with lambda expressions.
>>
>> I try to build the Quickstart project with mvn clean package. The build
>> runs through, but the fat jar file(quickstart-0.1-flink-fat-jar.jar) only
>> contains a manifest file. The file itself has 370 bytes,
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> Stefan Papp
>> Hadoop Consultant
>>
>> Teradata GmbH
>> Mobile: [phone]
>> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>> teradata.com<http://www.teradata.com/>
>>
>> This e-mail is from Teradata Corporation and may contain information that
>> is confidential or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, do
>> not read, copy or distribute the e-mail or any attachments. Instead, please
>> notify the sender and delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you.
>> Please consider the environment before printing.
>>
>>

[Ufuk Celebi-2]

On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix this, Robert?

Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As you said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.

I am in favour of this. Big +1.

1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and defeats the purpose of a quickstart
3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would not need a lot of testing

I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but since it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to 0.8. I think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the primary download.

– Ufuk

[Robert Metzger]

The issue only appears when the user code is in the "org.apache.flink"
group.
The quickstart.sh script (
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/flink/master/flink-quickstart/quickstart.sh)
is calling archetype:generate with preconfigured values, and we set the
groupid to "org.apache.flink".

By changing the quickstart.sh scripts (something we can do without
releasing) we can mitigate the issue easily.


I'll update the quickstart.sh scripts now ...

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix this,
> Robert?
>
> Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As you
> said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.
>
> I am in favour of this. Big +1.
>
> 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and
> defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would not
> need a lot of testing
>
> I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but since
> it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to 0.8. I
> think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the primary
> download.
>
> – Ufuk

[Ufuk Celebi-2]

On 10 Apr 2015, at 10:56, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> The issue only appears when the user code is in the "org.apache.flink"
> group.
> The quickstart.sh script (
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/flink/master/flink-quickstart/quickstart.sh)
> is calling archetype:generate with preconfigured values, and we set the
> groupid to "org.apache.flink".
>
> By changing the quickstart.sh scripts (something we can do without
> releasing) we can mitigate the issue easily.

Ah yes, the quickstart scripts are in master. In this case, this comes in handy, but in general I find it confusing:

When I go to the SNAPSHOT docs and look at the quickstart page I actually get the latest stable quickstart.

If others agree (+1s in this thread are welcome ;)), I'll open a JIRA and fix it.

– Ufuk

[Aljoscha Krettek-2]

+1

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On 10 Apr 2015, at 10:56, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> The issue only appears when the user code is in the "org.apache.flink"
>> group.
>> The quickstart.sh script (
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/flink/master/flink-quickstart/quickstart.sh)
>> is calling archetype:generate with preconfigured values, and we set the
>> groupid to "org.apache.flink".
>>
>> By changing the quickstart.sh scripts (something we can do without
>> releasing) we can mitigate the issue easily.
>
> Ah yes, the quickstart scripts are in master. In this case, this comes in handy, but in general I find it confusing:
>
> When I go to the SNAPSHOT docs and look at the quickstart page I actually get the latest stable quickstart.
>
> If others agree (+1s in this thread are welcome ;)), I'll open a JIRA and fix it.
>
> – Ufuk

[Robert Metzger]

Okay, the quickstart.sh scripts are updated.

I don't know if there is a variable for the URL to the quickstart in the
documentation. I guess we need to add one for switching between the
quickstart.sh and the quickstart-SNAPSHOT.sh script.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > On 10 Apr 2015, at 10:56, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> The issue only appears when the user code is in the "org.apache.flink"
> >> group.
> >> The quickstart.sh script (
> >>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/flink/master/flink-quickstart/quickstart.sh
> )
> >> is calling archetype:generate with preconfigured values, and we set the
> >> groupid to "org.apache.flink".
> >>
> >> By changing the quickstart.sh scripts (something we can do without
> >> releasing) we can mitigate the issue easily.
> >
> > Ah yes, the quickstart scripts are in master. In this case, this comes
> in handy, but in general I find it confusing:
> >
> > When I go to the SNAPSHOT docs and look at the quickstart page I
> actually get the latest stable quickstart.
> >
> > If others agree (+1s in this thread are welcome ;)), I'll open a JIRA
> and fix it.
> >
> > – Ufuk
>

[mxm]

If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a 0.8.2
release.

I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We could
think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we could
fix

"Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828

If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that also
required some testing..

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix this,
> Robert?
>
> Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As you
> said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.
>
> I am in favour of this. Big +1.
>
> 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and
> defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would not
> need a lot of testing
>
> I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but since
> it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to 0.8. I
> think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the primary
> download.
>
> – Ufuk

[Fabian Hueske-2]

There are already quite a few fixes pushed to the 0.8 branch.
A 0.8.2 release would make sense, IMO.
But we should also check Jira if there is more stuff to fix.
On Apr 10, 2015 12:54 PM, "Maximilian Michels" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a 0.8.2
> release.
>
> I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We could
> think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we could
> fix
>
> "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
>
> If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that also
> required some testing..
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix
> this,
> > Robert?
> >
> > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As you
> > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.
> >
> > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> >
> > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and
> > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would not
> > need a lot of testing
> >
> > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but
> since
> > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to 0.8. I
> > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the primary
> > download.
> >
> > – Ufuk
>

[Robert Metzger]

We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC

So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a 0.8.2
> release.
>
> I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We could
> think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we could
> fix
>
> "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
>
> If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that also
> required some testing..
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix
> this,
> > Robert?
> >
> > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As you
> > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.
> >
> > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> >
> > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and
> > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would not
> > need a lot of testing
> >
> > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but
> since
> > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to 0.8. I
> > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the primary
> > download.
> >
> > – Ufuk
>

[Henry Saputra]

Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?

On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>
> So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a 0.8.2
> > release.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We
> could
> > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we could
> > fix
> >
> > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> >
> > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that also
> > required some testing..
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix
> > this,
> > > Robert?
> > >
> > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As you
> > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.
> > >
> > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > >
> > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and
> > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would not
> > > need a lot of testing
> > >
> > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but
> > since
> > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to
> 0.8. I
> > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the
> primary
> > > download.
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> >
>

[Robert Metzger]

Its this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1342

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
> >
> > So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a 0.8.2
> > > release.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We
> > could
> > > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we
> could
> > > fix
> > >
> > > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> > >
> > > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that
> also
> > > required some testing..
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix
> > > this,
> > > > Robert?
> > > >
> > > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As
> you
> > > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty.
> > > >
> > > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > > >
> > > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and
> > > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would
> not
> > > > need a lot of testing
> > > >
> > > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but
> > > since
> > > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to
> > 0.8. I
> > > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the
> > primary
> > > > download.
> > > >
> > > > – Ufuk
> > >
> >
>

[Henry Saputra]

Ah thanks. I assume this need to be tagged for 0.8.2 release?

On Monday, April 13, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Its this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1342
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?
> >
> > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
> > >
> > > So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a
> 0.8.2
> > > > release.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We
> > > could
> > > > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we
> > could
> > > > fix
> > > >
> > > > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> > > >
> > > > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that
> > also
> > > > required some testing..
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to
> fix
> > > > this,
> > > > > Robert?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As
> > you
> > > > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than
> empty.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system
> and
> > > > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would
> > not
> > > > > need a lot of testing
> > > > >
> > > > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release,
> but
> > > > since
> > > > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to
> > > 0.8. I
> > > > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the
> > > primary
> > > > > download.
> > > > >
> > > > > – Ufuk
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Robert Metzger]

I tagged it to affect 0.8.x.
I'll backport the fix to 0.8, then we can mark it as fixed for that release
as well.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Ah thanks. I assume this need to be tagged for 0.8.2 release?
>
> On Monday, April 13, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Its this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1342
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?
> > >
> > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
> > > >
> > > > So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a
> > 0.8.2
> > > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue.
> We
> > > > could
> > > > > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we
> > > could
> > > > > fix
> > > > >
> > > > > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> > > > >
> > > > > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that
> > > also
> > > > > required some testing..
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to
> > fix
> > > > > this,
> > > > > > Robert?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8?
> As
> > > you
> > > > > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than
> > empty.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > > > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system
> > and
> > > > > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > > > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC
> would
> > > not
> > > > > > need a lot of testing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release,
> > but
> > > > > since
> > > > > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking
> to
> > > > 0.8. I
> > > > > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the
> > > > primary
> > > > > > download.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > – Ufuk
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Henry Saputra]

Sounds good, thx Robert!

On Monday, April 13, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I tagged it to affect 0.8.x.
> I'll backport the fix to 0.8, then we can mark it as fixed for that release
> as well.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Ah thanks. I assume this need to be tagged for 0.8.2 release?
> >
> > On Monday, April 13, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Its this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1342
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra <
> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue?
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
> > > > >
> > > > > So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a
> > > 0.8.2
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor
> issue.
> > We
> > > > > could
> > > > > > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example,
> we
> > > > could
> > > > > > fix
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table"
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release
> that
> > > > also
> > > > > > required some testing..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <
> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch
> to
> > > fix
> > > > > > this,
> > > > > > > Robert?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8?
> > As
> > > > you
> > > > > > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than
> > > empty.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am in favour of this. Big +1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this
> > > > > > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the
> system
> > > and
> > > > > > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart
> > > > > > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC
> > would
> > > > not
> > > > > > > need a lot of testing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1
> release,
> > > but
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking
> > to
> > > > > 0.8. I
> > > > > > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as
> the
> > > > > primary
> > > > > > > download.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > – Ufuk
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>