New Blog Post Draft
Locked
New Blog Post Draft
 
|
Hi,
after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the Storm compatibility layer. You can find the draft here: https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png Looking forward to your feedback! -Matthias |
signature.asc (836 bytes)
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
a PR. https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15 @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do a second blog post later on -Matthias On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote: > Matthias, > > This is great blog! > > I would like to suggest the following: > Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache Flink stream processing engine? > Fixing the few typos > For this reasons -> For these reasons > Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package that allows users > we need to translated it -> we need to translate it > in not available -> is not available > eg, StormWordCount.jar -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar > Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus running it on Flink. > Thanks > > Slim Baltagi > > On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Great, thank you for writing the article. >> >> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos. >> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing >> it easier? >> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I >>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the >>> Storm compatibility layer. >>> >>> You can find the draft here: >>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md >>> >>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: >>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png >>> >>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> > > |
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have any more comments on the draft. -Matthias On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote: > Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily. > > On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Great post! Thanks! >> >> I have also made some comments in the commit. >> >> – Ufuk >> >>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with >>> me. This one looks even better! >>> >>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Max >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened >>>> a PR. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15 >>>> >>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do >>>> a second blog post later on >>>> >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote: >>>>> Matthias, >>>>> >>>>> This is great blog! >>>>> >>>>> I would like to suggest the following: >>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on >> Apache Flink stream processing engine? >>>>> Fixing the few typos >>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons >>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility >> package that allows users >>>>> we need to translated it -> we need to translate it >>>>> in not available -> is not available >>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar >>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus >> running it on Flink. >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Slim Baltagi >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article. >>>>>> >>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos. >>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make >> reviewing >>>>>> it easier? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I >>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about >> the >>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can find the draft here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> > |
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Just published it. Spread the word :)
Thanks for all your valuable feedback! On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR. > > I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have > any more comments on the draft. > > -Matthias > > On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote: >> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily. >> >> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Great post! Thanks! >>> >>> I have also made some comments in the commit. >>> >>> – Ufuk >>> >>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Matthias, >>>> >>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with >>>> me. This one looks even better! >>>> >>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Max >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened >>>>> a PR. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15 >>>>> >>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do >>>>> a second blog post later on >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote: >>>>>> Matthias, >>>>>> >>>>>> This is great blog! >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to suggest the following: >>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on >>> Apache Flink stream processing engine? >>>>>> Fixing the few typos >>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons >>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility >>> package that allows users >>>>>> we need to translated it -> we need to translate it >>>>>> in not available -> is not available >>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar >>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus >>> running it on Flink. >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Slim Baltagi >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos. >>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make >>> reviewing >>>>>>> it easier? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I >>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about >>> the >>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can find the draft here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > |
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
Re: New Blog Post Draft
|
|
In reply to this post by Slim Baltagi
Awesome! Thanks a lot!
On 12/11/2015 11:18 AM, Slim Baltagi wrote: > Hi Matthias > > I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members! > > Big Data and Analytics 160, 316 > Hadoop Users 74,333 > Big Data, Low Latency 19,949 > Apache Storm 955 > Apache Flink 205 > > > Slim > > On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Just published it. Spread the word :) >> >> Thanks for all your valuable feedback! >> >> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: >>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR. >>> >>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have >>> any more comments on the draft. >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote: >>>> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily. >>>> >>>> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great post! Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> I have also made some comments in the commit. >>>>> >>>>> – Ufuk >>>>> >>>>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Matthias, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with >>>>>> me. This one looks even better! >>>>>> >>>>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Max >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened >>>>>>> a PR. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do >>>>>>> a second blog post later on >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote: >>>>>>>> Matthias, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is great blog! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to suggest the following: >>>>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on >>>>> Apache Flink stream processing engine? >>>>>>>> Fixing the few typos >>>>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons >>>>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility >>>>> package that allows users >>>>>>>> we need to translated it -> we need to translate it >>>>>>>> in not available -> is not available >>>>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar >>>>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus >>>>> running it on Flink. >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slim Baltagi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos. >>>>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make >>>>> reviewing >>>>>>>>> it easier? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I >>>>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can find the draft here: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |