New Blog Post Draft

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

New Blog Post Draft

Matthias J. Sax-2
Hi,

after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
Storm compatibility layer.

You can find the draft here:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md

The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png

Looking forward to your feedback!


-Matthias


signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Robert Metzger
Great, thank you for writing the article.

I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
it easier?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
> Storm compatibility layer.
>
> You can find the draft here:
>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>
> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>
> Looking forward to your feedback!
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Slim Baltagi
Matthias,

This is great blog!

I would like to suggest the following:
Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache Flink stream processing engine?
Fixing the few typos
For this reasons -> For these reasons
Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package that allows users
 we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
in not available -> is not available
eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus running it on Flink.
Thanks

Slim Baltagi

On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>
> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
> it easier?
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>
>> You can find the draft here:
>>
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>
>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>
>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Matthias J. Sax-2
Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
a PR.

https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15

@Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
a second blog post later on


-Matthias

On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:

> Matthias,
>
> This is great blog!
>
> I would like to suggest the following:
> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache Flink stream processing engine?
> Fixing the few typos
> For this reasons -> For these reasons
> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package that allows users
>  we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
> in not available -> is not available
> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus running it on Flink.
> Thanks
>
> Slim Baltagi
>
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>
>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
>> it easier?
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>
>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>
>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>>
>
>


signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment
mxm
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

mxm
Hi Matthias,

Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
me. This one looks even better!

I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.

Cheers,
Max

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
> a PR.
>
> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>
> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
> a second blog post later on
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>> Matthias,
>>
>> This is great blog!
>>
>> I would like to suggest the following:
>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>> Fixing the few typos
>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package that allows users
>>  we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>> in not available -> is not available
>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus running it on Flink.
>> Thanks
>>
>> Slim Baltagi
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>
>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
>>> it easier?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>>
>>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>>
>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Ufuk Celebi-2
Great post! Thanks!

I have also made some comments in the commit.

– Ufuk

> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
> me. This one looks even better!
>
> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>> a PR.
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>
>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>> a second blog post later on
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>> Matthias,
>>>
>>> This is great blog!
>>>
>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>>> Fixing the few typos
>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package that allows users
>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>> in not available -> is not available
>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus running it on Flink.
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Slim Baltagi
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>>
>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
>>>> it easier?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
>>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>>>
>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Vasiliki Kalavri
Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.

On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Great post! Thanks!
>
> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>
> – Ufuk
>
> > On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
> > me. This one looks even better!
> >
> > I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Max
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
> >> a PR.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
> >>
> >> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
> >> a second blog post later on
> >>
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
> >>> Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> This is great blog!
> >>>
> >>> I would like to suggest the following:
> >>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
> >>> Fixing the few typos
> >>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
> >>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
> package that allows users
> >>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
> >>> in not available -> is not available
> >>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
> >>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
> running it on Flink.
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Slim Baltagi
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
> >>>>
> >>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
> >>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
> reviewing
> >>>> it easier?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
> >>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
> the
> >>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can find the draft here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Matthias J. Sax-2
Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.

I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
any more comments on the draft.

-Matthias

On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:

> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.
>
> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Great post! Thanks!
>>
>> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>>
>> – Ufuk
>>
>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>>> me. This one looks even better!
>>>
>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Max
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>>>> a PR.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>>>
>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>>>> a second blog post later on
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>>>> Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is great blog!
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
>> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>>>>> Fixing the few typos
>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
>> package that allows users
>>>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>>>> in not available -> is not available
>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
>> running it on Flink.
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Slim Baltagi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
>> reviewing
>>>>>> it easier?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
>> the
>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>


signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Matthias J. Sax-2
Just published it. Spread the word :)

Thanks for all your valuable feedback!

On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:

> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
>
> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
> any more comments on the draft.
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
>> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.
>>
>> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Great post! Thanks!
>>>
>>> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>>>
>>> – Ufuk
>>>
>>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>>>> me. This one looks even better!
>>>>
>>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Max
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>>>>> a PR.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>>>>
>>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>>>>> a second blog post later on
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>>>>> Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is great blog!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
>>> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>>>>>> Fixing the few typos
>>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
>>> package that allows users
>>>>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>>>>> in not available -> is not available
>>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
>>> running it on Flink.
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Slim Baltagi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
>>> reviewing
>>>>>>> it easier?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
>>> the
>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Slim Baltagi
Hi Matthias

I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members!

Big Data and Analytics 160, 316
Hadoop Users                 74,333
Big Data, Low Latency    19,949
Apache Storm                       955
Apache Flink                         205


Slim

On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Just published it. Spread the word :)
>
> Thanks for all your valuable feedback!
>
> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
>>
>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
>> any more comments on the draft.
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
>>> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.
>>>
>>> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great post! Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>>>>
>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>
>>>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>>>>> me. This one looks even better!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Max
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>>>>>> a PR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>>>>>> a second blog post later on
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>>>>>> Matthias,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is great blog!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
>>>> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>>>>>>> Fixing the few typos
>>>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
>>>> package that allows users
>>>>>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>>>>>> in not available -> is not available
>>>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
>>>> running it on Flink.
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Slim Baltagi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
>>>> reviewing
>>>>>>>> it easier?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

mxm
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

mxm
Great! :)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Slim Baltagi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Matthias
>
> I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members!
>
> Big Data and Analytics 160, 316
> Hadoop Users                 74,333
> Big Data, Low Latency    19,949
> Apache Storm                       955
> Apache Flink                         205
>
>
> Slim
>
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Just published it. Spread the word :)
>>
>> Thanks for all your valuable feedback!
>>
>> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
>>>
>>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
>>> any more comments on the draft.
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
>>>> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.
>>>>
>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Great post! Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>>>>>
>>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>>>>>> me. This one looks even better!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>>>>>>> a PR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>>>>>>> a second blog post later on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>>>>>>> Matthias,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is great blog!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>>>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
>>>>> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>>>>>>>> Fixing the few typos
>>>>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
>>>>> package that allows users
>>>>>>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>>>>>>> in not available -> is not available
>>>>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>>>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
>>>>> running it on Flink.
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Slim Baltagi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>>>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
>>>>> reviewing
>>>>>>>>> it easier?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>>>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Blog Post Draft

Matthias J. Sax-2
In reply to this post by Slim Baltagi
Awesome! Thanks a lot!

On 12/11/2015 11:18 AM, Slim Baltagi wrote:

> Hi Matthias
>
> I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members!
>
> Big Data and Analytics 160, 316
> Hadoop Users                 74,333
> Big Data, Low Latency    19,949
> Apache Storm                       955
> Apache Flink                         205
>
>
> Slim
>
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Just published it. Spread the word :)
>>
>> Thanks for all your valuable feedback!
>>
>> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
>>>
>>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
>>> any more comments on the draft.
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
>>>> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.
>>>>
>>>> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Great post! Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>>>>>
>>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>>>>>> me. This one looks even better!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>>>>>>> a PR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>>>>>>> a second blog post later on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>>>>>>> Matthias,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is great blog!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>>>>>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
>>>>> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>>>>>>>> Fixing the few typos
>>>>>>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
>>>>> package that allows users
>>>>>>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>>>>>>> in not available -> is not available
>>>>>>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>>>>>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
>>>>> running it on Flink.
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Slim Baltagi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>>>>>>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
>>>>> reviewing
>>>>>>>>> it easier?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>>>>>>>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment