[DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

Hermann Gábor
Hey all,

The default language for the source codes in the documentation is Java (see
the Programming Guide
<http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html>),
but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
<http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>) Scala is
the default. I think it should be consistent.

Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source codes, but
Java is more widely used.

What do you think?

It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala docs)
with Marton.

Cheers,
Gabor
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

Stephan Ewen
I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.

I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> The default language for the source codes in the documentation is Java (see
> the Programming Guide
> <
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
> >),
> but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
> <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>) Scala is
> the default. I think it should be consistent.
>
> Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source codes, but
> Java is more widely used.
>
> What do you think?
>
> It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala docs)
> with Marton.
>
> Cheers,
> Gabor
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

Márton Balassi
I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a default
- thus making the shorter page the default.

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
>
> I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is Java
> (see
> > the Programming Guide
> > <
> >
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
> > >),
> > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
> > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>) Scala
> is
> > the default. I think it should be consistent.
> >
> > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source codes,
> but
> > Java is more widely used.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala
> docs)
> > with Marton.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gabor
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

Till Rohrmann
+1 for Scala :-)

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a default
> - thus making the shorter page the default.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
> >
> > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is Java
> > (see
> > > the Programming Guide
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
> > > >),
> > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
> > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>)
> Scala
> > is
> > > the default. I think it should be consistent.
> > >
> > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source codes,
> > but
> > > Java is more widely used.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala
> > docs)
> > > with Marton.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gabor
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

Márton Balassi
Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 for Scala :-)
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a
> default
> > - thus making the shorter page the default.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
> > >
> > > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is
> Java
> > > (see
> > > > the Programming Guide
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
> > > > >),
> > > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
> > > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>)
> > Scala
> > > is
> > > > the default. I think it should be consistent.
> > > >
> > > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source
> codes,
> > > but
> > > > Java is more widely used.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala
> > > docs)
> > > > with Marton.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Gabor
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

aalexandrov
+1 for Scala

2015-03-09 15:34 GMT+01:00 Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>:

> Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Scala :-)
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a
> > default
> > > - thus making the shorter page the default.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
> > > >
> > > > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is
> > Java
> > > > (see
> > > > > the Programming Guide
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
> > > > > >),
> > > > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
> > > > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>)
> > > Scala
> > > > is
> > > > > the default. I think it should be consistent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source
> > codes,
> > > > but
> > > > > Java is more widely used.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming
> Scala
> > > > docs)
> > > > > with Marton.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Gabor
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
mxm
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order

mxm
In reply to this post by Márton Balassi
+1 for Scala as a default. Looks much less verbose.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Scala :-)
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a
>> default
>> > - thus making the shorter page the default.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
>> > >
>> > > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey all,
>> > > >
>> > > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is
>> Java
>> > > (see
>> > > > the Programming Guide
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
>> > > > >),
>> > > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
>> > > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>)
>> > Scala
>> > > is
>> > > > the default. I think it should be consistent.
>> > > >
>> > > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source
>> codes,
>> > > but
>> > > > Java is more widely used.
>> > > >
>> > > > What do you think?
>> > > >
>> > > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala
>> > > docs)
>> > > > with Marton.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Gabor
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>