[jira] [Created] (FLINK-22424) Writing to already released buffers potentially causing data corruption

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-22424) Writing to already released buffers potentially causing data corruption

Shang Yuanchun (Jira)
Piotr Nowojski created FLINK-22424:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Writing to already released buffers potentially causing data corruption
                 Key: FLINK-22424
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22424
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Runtime / Network
    Affects Versions: 1.12.2, 1.11.3, 1.10.3, 1.9.3, 1.8.3, 1.7.2, 1.6.4, 1.13.0
            Reporter: Piotr Nowojski


By modifing the code to not re-use the same memory segments, but on recycling always free up the segment. And what I have observed is a similar problem as reported in FLINK-21181 ticket, but even more severe:

{noformat}
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: segment has been freed
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.RecordWriterOutput.pushToRecordWriter(RecordWriterOutput.java:109)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.RecordWriterOutput.collect(RecordWriterOutput.java:93)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.RecordWriterOutput.collect(RecordWriterOutput.java:44)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.CountingOutput.collect(CountingOutput.java:50)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.CountingOutput.collect(CountingOutput.java:28)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.TimestampedCollector.collect(TimestampedCollector.java:50)
        at org.apache.flink.test.checkpointing.UnalignedCheckpointStressITCase$ReEmitAll.process(UnalignedCheckpointStressITCase.java:477)
        at org.apache.flink.test.checkpointing.UnalignedCheckpointStressITCase$ReEmitAll.process(UnalignedCheckpointStressITCase.java:468)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.functions.InternalIterableProcessWindowFunction.process(InternalIterableProcessWindowFunction.java:57)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.functions.InternalIterableProcessWindowFunction.process(InternalIterableProcessWindowFunction.java:32)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.WindowOperator.emitWindowContents(WindowOperator.java:577)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.operators.windowing.WindowOperator.onProcessingTime(WindowOperator.java:533)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.InternalTimerServiceImpl.onProcessingTime(InternalTimerServiceImpl.java:284)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invokeProcessingTimeCallback(StreamTask.java:1395)
        ... 11 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: segment has been freed
        at org.apache.flink.core.memory.MemorySegment.put(MemorySegment.java:483)
        at org.apache.flink.core.memory.MemorySegment.put(MemorySegment.java:1398)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.buffer.BufferBuilder.append(BufferBuilder.java:100)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.buffer.BufferBuilder.appendAndCommit(BufferBuilder.java:82)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.BufferWritingResultPartition.appendUnicastDataForNewRecord(BufferWritingResultPartition.java:250)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.BufferWritingResultPartition.emitRecord(BufferWritingResultPartition.java:142)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.api.writer.RecordWriter.emit(RecordWriter.java:104)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.api.writer.ChannelSelectorRecordWriter.emit(ChannelSelectorRecordWriter.java:54)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.RecordWriterOutput.pushToRecordWriter(RecordWriterOutput.java:107)
        ... 24 more
{noformat}
That's happening also during cancellation/job failover. It's failing when trying to write to already `free`'ed up buffer. Without my changes, this code would silently write some data to a buffer that has already been recycled/returned to the pool. If someone else would pick up this buffer, it would easily lead to the data corruption.

As far as I can tell, the exact reason behind this is that the buffer to which timer attempts to write to, has been released from `ResultSubpartition#onConsumedSubpartition`, causing `BufferConsumer` to be closed (which recycles/frees underlying memory segment ), while matching `BufferBuilder` is still being used...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)