[jira] [Created] (FLINK-20413) Sources should add splits back in "resetSubtask()", rather than in "subtaskFailed()".

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-20413) Sources should add splits back in "resetSubtask()", rather than in "subtaskFailed()".

Shang Yuanchun (Jira)
Stephan Ewen created FLINK-20413:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Sources should add splits back in "resetSubtask()", rather than in "subtaskFailed()".
                 Key: FLINK-20413
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20413
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Runtime / Coordination
            Reporter: Stephan Ewen
            Assignee: Stephan Ewen
             Fix For: 1.12.0


Because "subtaskFailed()" has no strong order guarantees with checkpoint completion, we need to return failed splits in "resetSubtask()" instead.

See FLINK-20396 for a detailed explanation of the race condition.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)