[jira] [Created] (FLINK-19570) Execution graph related tests are possibly broken due to registering duplicated ExecutionAttemptID

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-19570) Execution graph related tests are possibly broken due to registering duplicated ExecutionAttemptID

Shang Yuanchun (Jira)
Zhu Zhu created FLINK-19570:
-------------------------------

             Summary: Execution graph related tests are possibly broken due to registering duplicated ExecutionAttemptID
                 Key: FLINK-19570
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19570
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Runtime / Coordination, Tests
    Affects Versions: 1.12.0
            Reporter: Zhu Zhu
            Assignee: Zhu Zhu
             Fix For: 1.12.0


Since FLINK-17295, many tests encounters unexpected global failure due to registering duplicated ExecutionAttemptID. Although these tests do not appear to be broken yet, they are potentially broken/unstable. And it further blocks to rework these tests to be based on the new scheduer (FLINK-17760).

Below is a sample error which happens in ExecutionTest#testAllPreferredLocationCalculation():

{code:java}
java.lang.Exception: Trying to register execution Attempt #0 (TestVertex (1/1)) @ (unassigned) - [CREATED] for already used ID a22afb832b5f94b075d7ffb32fbc9023_146968a4de2df0b2fef1e4b2e8297993_0_0
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraph.registerExecution(ExecutionGraph.java:1621) [classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionVertex.<init>(ExecutionVertex.java:181) [classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionJobVertex.<init>(ExecutionJobVertex.java:211) [classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionJobVertex.<init>(ExecutionJobVertex.java:139) [classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.getExecutionJobVertex(ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java:448) [test-classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.getExecutionJobVertex(ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java:419) [test-classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.getExecutionJobVertex(ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java:411) [test-classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.getExecutionJobVertex(ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java:452) [test-classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionGraphTestUtils.getExecution(ExecutionGraphTestUtils.java:477) [test-classes/:?]
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph.ExecutionTest.testAllPreferredLocationCalculation(ExecutionTest.java:298) [test-classes/:?]
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) ~[?:1.8.0_261]
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) ~[?:1.8.0_261]
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) ~[?:1.8.0_261]
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) ~[?:1.8.0_261]
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:48) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137) [junit-4.12.jar:4.12]
        at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:69) [junit-rt.jar:?]
        at com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:33) [junit-rt.jar:?]
        at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:220) [junit-rt.jar:?]
        at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:53) [junit-rt.jar:?]
{code}

This is because these tests improperly creates Execution/ExecutionVertex/ExecutionJobVertex from an existing ExecutionGraph which already contains the Execution/ExecutionVertex/ExecutionJobVertex. E.g. in ExecutionGraphTestUtils#getExecutionJobVertex(), there is

{code:java}

                JobGraph jobGraph = new JobGraph(ajv);
                jobGraph.setScheduleMode(scheduleMode);

                ExecutionGraph graph = TestingExecutionGraphBuilder
                        .newBuilder()
                        .setJobGraph(jobGraph)
                        .setIoExecutor(executor)
                        .setFutureExecutor(executor)
                        .build();

                graph.start(ComponentMainThreadExecutorServiceAdapter.forMainThread());

                return new ExecutionJobVertex(graph, ajv, 1, AkkaUtils.getDefaultTimeout());
{code}

We should get rid of such improper usages.
Therefore, I would like to change these tests to get existing Execution/ExecutionVertex/ExecutionJobVertex from the generated ExecutionGraph, instead of invoking their constructors to create new ones.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)