[jira] [Created] (FLINK-15865) When to add .uid() call: inconsistent definition of operators in Flink docs

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-15865) When to add .uid() call: inconsistent definition of operators in Flink docs

Shang Yuanchun (Jira)
Jun Qin created FLINK-15865:
-------------------------------

             Summary: When to add .uid() call: inconsistent definition of operators in Flink docs
                 Key: FLINK-15865
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15865
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Documentation
    Affects Versions: 1.9.1
            Reporter: Jun Qin


On one hand, the Flink doc suggests to add .uid() call for *all* operators in [1], on the other hand, it lists all operators in Flink [2]. The issues are:
 # KeyBy is listed as an operator, but .keyBy().uid() is not a valid call. This is same for window(), split(), etc.

 # addSource(), addSink() are not listed as operators, but we do expect user to call .uid() after addSource() and addSink(), especially in the exact-once scenario.

This creates confusions, esp., for beginners. There should be a better definition about which/what kind of operators can have a following uid() call.

[1] [Should I assign ids to all operators in my job|https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.9/ops/state/savepoints.html#should-i-assign-ids-to-all-operators-in-my-job]
[2] [Flink Operators|https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.9/dev/stream/operators/]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)