[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-954) Improvements to the Web Frontend Plan presentation

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-954) Improvements to the Web Frontend Plan presentation

Shang Yuanchun (Jira)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14037335#comment-14037335 ]

Jonathan Hasenburg commented on FLINK-954:
------------------------------------------

Hi, here is what I think about this:

1. Sounds like a good feature.
2. We need the ID because when there is an edge from inside an iteration to a node which is outside we can not draw it. So that is why we have an additional line in the node which shows which nodes SHOULD be connected with an edge.
3. Whatever you prefer.
4. Sadly this is not possible with the framework :(.
5. This would be an improvement to what I wrote in 2. I like it.

When we agreed on all of this I will start to implement it :).

> Improvements to the Web Frontend Plan presentation
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-954
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Webfrontend
>    Affects Versions: 0.6-incubating
>            Reporter: Stephan Ewen
>            Assignee: Jonathan Hasenburg
>
> I propose some changes to the way the plan is displayed in the webfrontend:
>   1. Add zoom buttons (+/-). On Laptops where you have no mouse wheel, you cannot zoom the graph.
>   2. Omit the ID in the title of the operators (maybe list it in the bottom)
>   3. Rename "Driver Strategy" to "Strategy" or "Operations"
>   4. Make the arrows from Broadcast variables enter the box from top/bottom, rather than from the left.
>   5. Instead of writing in a node "Additional Edge to Node X" , can you actually draw a box X and have an arrow from X to that node?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)