[VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
Locked
[VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
 
|
Dear Flink community,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink-shaded version 1.0. The commit to be voted in: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded/commit/fd3033ba9ead310478963bf43e09cd50d1e36d71 Branch: release-1.0-rc1 The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: http://home.apache.org/~chesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/ <http://home.apache.org/%7Echesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 19F2195E1B4816D765A2C324C2EED7B111D464BA: http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS The staging repository for this release can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1130 ------------------------------------------------------------- The vote ends on Monday (5pm CEST), July 24th, 2017. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... ------------------------------------------------------------- The flink-shaded project contains a number of shaded dependencies for Apache Flink. This release includes asm-all:5.0.4, guava:18.0, netty-all:4.0.27-FINAL and netty-router:1.10 . Note that netty-all and netty-router are bundled as a single dependency. The purpose of these dependencies is to provide a single instance of a shaded dependency in the Apache Flink distribution, instead of each individual module shading the dependency. For more information, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6529. |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
|
|
Here's a list of things we need to check:
* correct License/Notice files * licenses of shaded dependencies are included in the jar * the versions of shaded dependencies match those used in Flink 1.4 * compilation with maven works * the assembled jars only contain the shaded dependency and no non-shaded classes * no transitive dependencies should be exposed On 19.07.2017 15:59, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > Dear Flink community, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Flink-shaded version 1.0. > > The commit to be voted in: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded/commit/fd3033ba9ead310478963bf43e09cd50d1e36d71 > > > Branch: > release-1.0-rc1 > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > http://home.apache.org/~chesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/ > <http://home.apache.org/%7Echesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/> > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > 19F2195E1B4816D765A2C324C2EED7B111D464BA: > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1130 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > The vote ends on Monday (5pm CEST), July 24th, 2017. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > The flink-shaded project contains a number of shaded dependencies for > Apache Flink. > > This release includes asm-all:5.0.4, guava:18.0, > netty-all:4.0.27-FINAL and netty-router:1.10 . Note that netty-all and > netty-router are bundled as a single dependency. > > The purpose of these dependencies is to provide a single instance of a > shaded dependency in the Apache Flink distribution, instead of each > individual module shading the dependency. > > For more information, see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6529. > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
|
|
Thanks a lot for preparing the release artifacts.
While checking the source repo / release commit, I realized that you are not following the versioning scheme as flink: the current master has a "x.y-SNAPSHOT" version, and release candidates (and releases) get a x.y.z version. I wonder if it makes sense to use the same model in the flink-shaded.git repo. I think this is the default assumption in maven, and some modules behave differently based on the version: for example "mvn deploy" sends "-SNAPSHOT" artifacts to a snapshot server, and release artifacts to a staging repository. I don't think we need to cancel the release because of this, I just wanted to raise this point to see what others are thinking. I've checked the following - The netty shaded jar contains the MIT license from netty router: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1130/org/apache/flink/flink-shaded-netty-4/1.0-4.0.27.Final/flink-shaded-netty-4-1.0-4.0.27.Final.jar - In the staging repo, I didn't see any dependencies exposed. - I checked some of the md5 sums in the staging and they were correct / I used a mvn plugin to check the signatures in the staging repo and they were okay - clean install in the source repo worked (this includes a license header check) - LICENSE and NOTICE file are there ==> +1 to release. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote: > Here's a list of things we need to check: > > * correct License/Notice files > * licenses of shaded dependencies are included in the jar > * the versions of shaded dependencies match those used in Flink 1.4 > * compilation with maven works > * the assembled jars only contain the shaded dependency and no > non-shaded classes > * no transitive dependencies should be exposed > > > On 19.07.2017 15:59, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > >> Dear Flink community, >> >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink-shaded >> version 1.0. >> >> The commit to be voted in: >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded/commit/fd30 >> 33ba9ead310478963bf43e09cd50d1e36d71 >> >> Branch: >> release-1.0-rc1 >> >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >> http://home.apache.org/~chesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/ < >> http://home.apache.org/%7Echesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/> >> >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >> 19F2195E1B4816D765A2C324C2EED7B111D464BA: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1130 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> The vote ends on Monday (5pm CEST), July 24th, 2017. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> The flink-shaded project contains a number of shaded dependencies for >> Apache Flink. >> >> This release includes asm-all:5.0.4, guava:18.0, netty-all:4.0.27-FINAL >> and netty-router:1.10 . Note that netty-all and netty-router are bundled as >> a single dependency. >> >> The purpose of these dependencies is to provide a single instance of a >> shaded dependency in the Apache Flink distribution, instead of each >> individual module shading the dependency. >> >> For more information, see >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6529. >> >> > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
|
The release is technically correct, so
+1 for the release - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - Shaded artifacts add their licenses to the artifact where needed - no binaries in the release I will send another mail with suggestions for improving things for future releases On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > Thanks a lot for preparing the release artifacts. > While checking the source repo / release commit, I realized that you are > not following the versioning scheme as flink: > the current master has a "x.y-SNAPSHOT" version, and release candidates > (and releases) get a x.y.z version. I wonder if it makes sense to use the > same model in the flink-shaded.git repo. I think this is the default > assumption in maven, and some modules behave differently based on the > version: for example "mvn deploy" sends "-SNAPSHOT" artifacts to a snapshot > server, and release artifacts to a staging repository. > > I don't think we need to cancel the release because of this, I just wanted > to raise this point to see what others are thinking. > > > I've checked the following > - The netty shaded jar contains the MIT license from netty router: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheflink-1130/org/apache/flink/flink-shaded- > netty-4/1.0-4.0.27.Final/flink-shaded-netty-4-1.0-4.0.27.Final.jar > - In the staging repo, I didn't see any dependencies exposed. > - I checked some of the md5 sums in the staging and they were correct / I > used a mvn plugin to check the signatures in the staging repo and they were > okay > - clean install in the source repo worked (this includes a license header > check) > - LICENSE and NOTICE file are there > > ==> +1 to release. > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Here's a list of things we need to check: > > > > * correct License/Notice files > > * licenses of shaded dependencies are included in the jar > > * the versions of shaded dependencies match those used in Flink 1.4 > > * compilation with maven works > > * the assembled jars only contain the shaded dependency and no > > non-shaded classes > > * no transitive dependencies should be exposed > > > > > > On 19.07.2017 15:59, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > > > >> Dear Flink community, > >> > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink-shaded > >> version 1.0. > >> > >> The commit to be voted in: > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded/commit/fd30 > >> 33ba9ead310478963bf43e09cd50d1e36d71 > >> > >> Branch: > >> release-1.0-rc1 > >> > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > >> http://home.apache.org/~chesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/ < > >> http://home.apache.org/%7Echesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/> > >> > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > >> 19F2195E1B4816D765A2C324C2EED7B111D464BA: > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > >> > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1130 > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >> The vote ends on Monday (5pm CEST), July 24th, 2017. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >> The flink-shaded project contains a number of shaded dependencies for > >> Apache Flink. > >> > >> This release includes asm-all:5.0.4, guava:18.0, netty-all:4.0.27-FINAL > >> and netty-router:1.10 . Note that netty-all and netty-router are > bundled as > >> a single dependency. > >> > >> The purpose of these dependencies is to provide a single instance of a > >> shaded dependency in the Apache Flink distribution, instead of each > >> individual module shading the dependency. > >> > >> For more information, see > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6529. > >> > >> > > > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
|
|
Is there a pressing need to get the release out quickly? This being the first release, would it be better to change the versioning now to prevent future confusion? Even if Flink is the only intended consumer we’ll still be publishing the jars.
> On Jul 23, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > The release is technically correct, so > +1 for the release > > - LICENSE and NOTICE are good > - Shaded artifacts add their licenses to the artifact where needed > - no binaries in the release > > > I will send another mail with suggestions for improving things for future > releases > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> Thanks a lot for preparing the release artifacts. >> While checking the source repo / release commit, I realized that you are >> not following the versioning scheme as flink: >> the current master has a "x.y-SNAPSHOT" version, and release candidates >> (and releases) get a x.y.z version. I wonder if it makes sense to use the >> same model in the flink-shaded.git repo. I think this is the default >> assumption in maven, and some modules behave differently based on the >> version: for example "mvn deploy" sends "-SNAPSHOT" artifacts to a snapshot >> server, and release artifacts to a staging repository. >> >> I don't think we need to cancel the release because of this, I just wanted >> to raise this point to see what others are thinking. >> >> >> I've checked the following >> - The netty shaded jar contains the MIT license from netty router: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheflink-1130/org/apache/flink/flink-shaded- >> netty-4/1.0-4.0.27.Final/flink-shaded-netty-4-1.0-4.0.27.Final.jar >> - In the staging repo, I didn't see any dependencies exposed. >> - I checked some of the md5 sums in the staging and they were correct / I >> used a mvn plugin to check the signatures in the staging repo and they were >> okay >> - clean install in the source repo worked (this includes a license header >> check) >> - LICENSE and NOTICE file are there >> >> ==> +1 to release. >> >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> Here's a list of things we need to check: >>> >>> * correct License/Notice files >>> * licenses of shaded dependencies are included in the jar >>> * the versions of shaded dependencies match those used in Flink 1.4 >>> * compilation with maven works >>> * the assembled jars only contain the shaded dependency and no >>> non-shaded classes >>> * no transitive dependencies should be exposed >>> >>> >>> On 19.07.2017 15:59, Chesnay Schepler wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Flink community, >>>> >>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink-shaded >>>> version 1.0. >>>> >>>> The commit to be voted in: >>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded/commit/fd30 >>>> 33ba9ead310478963bf43e09cd50d1e36d71 >>>> >>>> Branch: >>>> release-1.0-rc1 >>>> >>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >>>> http://home.apache.org/~chesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/ < >>>> http://home.apache.org/%7Echesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/> >>>> >>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >>>> 19F2195E1B4816D765A2C324C2EED7B111D464BA: >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>>> >>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1130 >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> The vote ends on Monday (5pm CEST), July 24th, 2017. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> The flink-shaded project contains a number of shaded dependencies for >>>> Apache Flink. >>>> >>>> This release includes asm-all:5.0.4, guava:18.0, netty-all:4.0.27-FINAL >>>> and netty-router:1.10 . Note that netty-all and netty-router are >> bundled as >>>> a single dependency. >>>> >>>> The purpose of these dependencies is to provide a single instance of a >>>> shaded dependency in the Apache Flink distribution, instead of each >>>> individual module shading the dependency. >>>> >>>> For more information, see >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6529. |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
|
|
There is no real pressure, true.
I was simply checking the mandatory constraints for the release. and leave it to Chesnay to make the call whether to release or adjust the naming scheme of the artifacts. The other two points raised in the "improvements mail" are not really important in any way. On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Greg Hogan <[hidden email]> wrote: > Is there a pressing need to get the release out quickly? This being the > first release, would it be better to change the versioning now to prevent > future confusion? Even if Flink is the only intended consumer we’ll still > be publishing the jars. > > > > On Jul 23, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > The release is technically correct, so > > +1 for the release > > > > - LICENSE and NOTICE are good > > - Shaded artifacts add their licenses to the artifact where needed > > - no binaries in the release > > > > > > I will send another mail with suggestions for improving things for future > > releases > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks a lot for preparing the release artifacts. > >> While checking the source repo / release commit, I realized that you are > >> not following the versioning scheme as flink: > >> the current master has a "x.y-SNAPSHOT" version, and release candidates > >> (and releases) get a x.y.z version. I wonder if it makes sense to use > the > >> same model in the flink-shaded.git repo. I think this is the default > >> assumption in maven, and some modules behave differently based on the > >> version: for example "mvn deploy" sends "-SNAPSHOT" artifacts to a > snapshot > >> server, and release artifacts to a staging repository. > >> > >> I don't think we need to cancel the release because of this, I just > wanted > >> to raise this point to see what others are thinking. > >> > >> > >> I've checked the following > >> - The netty shaded jar contains the MIT license from netty router: > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapacheflink-1130/org/apache/flink/flink-shaded- > >> netty-4/1.0-4.0.27.Final/flink-shaded-netty-4-1.0-4.0.27.Final.jar > >> - In the staging repo, I didn't see any dependencies exposed. > >> - I checked some of the md5 sums in the staging and they were correct / > I > >> used a mvn plugin to check the signatures in the staging repo and they > were > >> okay > >> - clean install in the source repo worked (this includes a license > header > >> check) > >> - LICENSE and NOTICE file are there > >> > >> ==> +1 to release. > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Here's a list of things we need to check: > >>> > >>> * correct License/Notice files > >>> * licenses of shaded dependencies are included in the jar > >>> * the versions of shaded dependencies match those used in Flink 1.4 > >>> * compilation with maven works > >>> * the assembled jars only contain the shaded dependency and no > >>> non-shaded classes > >>> * no transitive dependencies should be exposed > >>> > >>> > >>> On 19.07.2017 15:59, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear Flink community, > >>>> > >>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Flink-shaded > >>>> version 1.0. > >>>> > >>>> The commit to be voted in: > >>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded/commit/fd30 > >>>> 33ba9ead310478963bf43e09cd50d1e36d71 > >>>> > >>>> Branch: > >>>> release-1.0-rc1 > >>>> > >>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > >>>> http://home.apache.org/~chesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/ < > >>>> http://home.apache.org/%7Echesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/> > >>>> > >>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > >>>> 19F2195E1B4816D765A2C324C2EED7B111D464BA: > >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > >>>> > >>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheflink-1130 > >>>> > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> The vote ends on Monday (5pm CEST), July 24th, 2017. > >>>> > >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 > >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... > >>>> > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> The flink-shaded project contains a number of shaded dependencies for > >>>> Apache Flink. > >>>> > >>>> This release includes asm-all:5.0.4, guava:18.0, > netty-all:4.0.27-FINAL > >>>> and netty-router:1.10 . Note that netty-all and netty-router are > >> bundled as > >>>> a single dependency. > >>>> > >>>> The purpose of these dependencies is to provide a single instance of a > >>>> shaded dependency in the Apache Flink distribution, instead of each > >>>> individual module shading the dependency. > >>>> > >>>> For more information, see > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6529. > |
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 (RC1)
|
|
I'm canceling the RC to fix the artifact versioning.
Greg raises a good point, and the required changes are minimal. I will create another RC later today. On 24.07.2017 10:22, Stephan Ewen wrote: > There is no real pressure, true. > > I was simply checking the mandatory constraints for the release. and leave > it to Chesnay to make the call whether to release or adjust the naming > scheme of the artifacts. > > The other two points raised in the "improvements mail" are not really > important in any way. > > > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Greg Hogan <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Is there a pressing need to get the release out quickly? This being the >> first release, would it be better to change the versioning now to prevent >> future confusion? Even if Flink is the only intended consumer we’ll still >> be publishing the jars. >> >> >>> On Jul 23, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> The release is technically correct, so >>> +1 for the release >>> >>> - LICENSE and NOTICE are good >>> - Shaded artifacts add their licenses to the artifact where needed >>> - no binaries in the release >>> >>> >>> I will send another mail with suggestions for improving things for future >>> releases >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks a lot for preparing the release artifacts. >>>> While checking the source repo / release commit, I realized that you are >>>> not following the versioning scheme as flink: >>>> the current master has a "x.y-SNAPSHOT" version, and release candidates >>>> (and releases) get a x.y.z version. I wonder if it makes sense to use >> the >>>> same model in the flink-shaded.git repo. I think this is the default >>>> assumption in maven, and some modules behave differently based on the >>>> version: for example "mvn deploy" sends "-SNAPSHOT" artifacts to a >> snapshot >>>> server, and release artifacts to a staging repository. >>>> >>>> I don't think we need to cancel the release because of this, I just >> wanted >>>> to raise this point to see what others are thinking. >>>> >>>> >>>> I've checked the following >>>> - The netty shaded jar contains the MIT license from netty router: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>> orgapacheflink-1130/org/apache/flink/flink-shaded- >>>> netty-4/1.0-4.0.27.Final/flink-shaded-netty-4-1.0-4.0.27.Final.jar >>>> - In the staging repo, I didn't see any dependencies exposed. >>>> - I checked some of the md5 sums in the staging and they were correct / >> I >>>> used a mvn plugin to check the signatures in the staging repo and they >> were >>>> okay >>>> - clean install in the source repo worked (this includes a license >> header >>>> check) >>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE file are there >>>> >>>> ==> +1 to release. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here's a list of things we need to check: >>>>> >>>>> * correct License/Notice files >>>>> * licenses of shaded dependencies are included in the jar >>>>> * the versions of shaded dependencies match those used in Flink 1.4 >>>>> * compilation with maven works >>>>> * the assembled jars only contain the shaded dependency and no >>>>> non-shaded classes >>>>> * no transitive dependencies should be exposed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 19.07.2017 15:59, Chesnay Schepler wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Flink community, >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >> Flink-shaded >>>>>> version 1.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> The commit to be voted in: >>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded/commit/fd30 >>>>>> 33ba9ead310478963bf43e09cd50d1e36d71 >>>>>> >>>>>> Branch: >>>>>> release-1.0-rc1 >>>>>> >>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~chesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/ < >>>>>> http://home.apache.org/%7Echesnay/flink-shaded-1.0-rc1/> >>>>>> >>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >>>>>> 19F2195E1B4816D765A2C324C2EED7B111D464BA: >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>>>>> >>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheflink-1130 >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote ends on Monday (5pm CEST), July 24th, 2017. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink-shaded 1.0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The flink-shaded project contains a number of shaded dependencies for >>>>>> Apache Flink. >>>>>> >>>>>> This release includes asm-all:5.0.4, guava:18.0, >> netty-all:4.0.27-FINAL >>>>>> and netty-router:1.10 . Note that netty-all and netty-router are >>>> bundled as >>>>>> a single dependency. >>>>>> >>>>>> The purpose of these dependencies is to provide a single instance of a >>>>>> shaded dependency in the Apache Flink distribution, instead of each >>>>>> individual module shading the dependency. >>>>>> >>>>>> For more information, see >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6529. |
«
Return to (DEPRECATED) Apache Flink Mailing List archive.
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |