[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)

Robert Metzger
Hi all,

this is the first VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0

The commit to be voted on:
e0a886e9 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>
(*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9
<http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>*)

Branch:
release-1.3.0-rc2

The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
*http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/
<http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/>*

The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159:
http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS

The staging repository for this release can be found at:
*https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121>*

-------------------------------------------------------------


The vote ends on Monday (May 29th), 7pm CET.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)

Till Rohrmann
Forwarding my concern from the previous RC thread:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6646 might be a blocker,
because it voids Flink's HA capabilities.

Robert argued that this is not a blocker because it was already broken in
1.2 and users didn't complain about it. Therefore, it seems to affect only
corner cases.

I think that partial high-availability is as good as no high-availability
at all. Therefore, I think we should cancel this RC and create a new one
containing a fix for the problem. Moreover, this is not only a problem of
the session mode but also for the per job cluster mode. Users simply didn't
run into the problem, because apparently their JM recovery didn't take
longer than 60s.

Cheers,
Till


On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> this is the first VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0
>
> The commit to be voted on:
> e0a886e9 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>
> (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9
> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>*)
>
> Branch:
> release-1.3.0-rc2
>
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/
> <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/>*
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121>*
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> The vote ends on Monday (May 29th), 7pm CET.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)

Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6714 is most likely a blocker.
It basically makes most of our connectors that are not part of the binary distribution and uses Java serialization for their operator state unusable in standalone mode.

There's a pending PR for the fix: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3987.

Cheers,
Gordon
On 25 May 2017 at 12:45:12 AM, Till Rohrmann ([hidden email]) wrote:

Forwarding my concern from the previous RC thread:  

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6646 might be a blocker,  
because it voids Flink's HA capabilities.  

Robert argued that this is not a blocker because it was already broken in  
1.2 and users didn't complain about it. Therefore, it seems to affect only  
corner cases.  

I think that partial high-availability is as good as no high-availability  
at all. Therefore, I think we should cancel this RC and create a new one  
containing a fix for the problem. Moreover, this is not only a problem of  
the session mode but also for the per job cluster mode. Users simply didn't  
run into the problem, because apparently their JM recovery didn't take  
longer than 60s.  

Cheers,  
Till  


On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:  

> Hi all,  
>  
> this is the first VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0  
>  
> The commit to be voted on:  
> e0a886e9 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>  
> (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9 
> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>*)  
>  
> Branch:  
> release-1.3.0-rc2  
>  
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:  
> *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/ 
> <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/>*  
>  
> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159:  
> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS 
>  
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:  
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121>*  
>  
> -------------------------------------------------------------  
>  
>  
> The vote ends on Monday (May 29th), 7pm CET.  
>  
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0  
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...  
>  
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)

Robert Metzger
Okay, it seems like there are two blockers for this RC.
Once both PRs are merged, I'll create the next RC (ideally tomorrow)

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6714 is most likely a
> blocker.
> It basically makes most of our connectors that are not part of the binary
> distribution and uses Java serialization for their operator state unusable
> in standalone mode.
>
> There's a pending PR for the fix: https://github.com/
> apache/flink/pull/3987.
>
> Cheers,
> Gordon
> On 25 May 2017 at 12:45:12 AM, Till Rohrmann ([hidden email]) wrote:
>
> Forwarding my concern from the previous RC thread:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6646 might be a blocker,
> because it voids Flink's HA capabilities.
>
> Robert argued that this is not a blocker because it was already broken in
> 1.2 and users didn't complain about it. Therefore, it seems to affect only
> corner cases.
>
> I think that partial high-availability is as good as no high-availability
> at all. Therefore, I think we should cancel this RC and create a new one
> containing a fix for the problem. Moreover, this is not only a problem of
> the session mode but also for the per job cluster mode. Users simply didn't
> run into the problem, because apparently their JM recovery didn't take
> longer than 60s.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is the first VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0
> >
> > The commit to be voted on:
> > e0a886e9 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>
> > (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9
> > <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>*)
> >
> > Branch:
> > release-1.3.0-rc2
> >
> > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/
> > <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/>*
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >
> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121
> > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121
> >*
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > The vote ends on Monday (May 29th), 7pm CET.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)

Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
The two blockers FLINK-6646 and FLINK-6714 have been merged.


On 26 May 2017 at 1:45:55 AM, Robert Metzger ([hidden email]) wrote:

Okay, it seems like there are two blockers for this RC.
Once both PRs are merged, I'll create the next RC (ideally tomorrow)

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6714 is most likely a
> blocker.
> It basically makes most of our connectors that are not part of the binary
> distribution and uses Java serialization for their operator state unusable
> in standalone mode.
>
> There's a pending PR for the fix: https://github.com/ 
> apache/flink/pull/3987.
>
> Cheers,
> Gordon
> On 25 May 2017 at 12:45:12 AM, Till Rohrmann ([hidden email]) wrote:
>
> Forwarding my concern from the previous RC thread:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6646 might be a blocker,
> because it voids Flink's HA capabilities.
>
> Robert argued that this is not a blocker because it was already broken in
> 1.2 and users didn't complain about it. Therefore, it seems to affect only
> corner cases.
>
> I think that partial high-availability is as good as no high-availability
> at all. Therefore, I think we should cancel this RC and create a new one
> containing a fix for the problem. Moreover, this is not only a problem of
> the session mode but also for the per job cluster mode. Users simply didn't
> run into the problem, because apparently their JM recovery didn't take
> longer than 60s.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is the first VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0
> >
> > The commit to be voted on:
> > e0a886e9 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>
> > (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9 
> > <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>*)
> >
> > Branch:
> > release-1.3.0-rc2
> >
> > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/ 
> > <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/>*
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS 
> >
> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121 
> > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1121 
> >*
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > The vote ends on Monday (May 29th), 7pm CET.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.3.0 (RC2)

Robert Metzger
Thanks a lot.

JIRA also shows me 0 open blockers :)
I'll then kick off the RC3 creation process.

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> The two blockers FLINK-6646 and FLINK-6714 have been merged.
>
>
> On 26 May 2017 at 1:45:55 AM, Robert Metzger ([hidden email]) wrote:
>
> Okay, it seems like there are two blockers for this RC.
> Once both PRs are merged, I'll create the next RC (ideally tomorrow)
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6714 is most likely
> a
> > blocker.
> > It basically makes most of our connectors that are not part of the binary
> > distribution and uses Java serialization for their operator state
> unusable
> > in standalone mode.
> >
> > There's a pending PR for the fix: https://github.com/
> > apache/flink/pull/3987.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gordon
> > On 25 May 2017 at 12:45:12 AM, Till Rohrmann ([hidden email])
> wrote:
> >
> > Forwarding my concern from the previous RC thread:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6646 might be a blocker,
> > because it voids Flink's HA capabilities.
> >
> > Robert argued that this is not a blocker because it was already broken in
> > 1.2 and users didn't complain about it. Therefore, it seems to affect
> only
> > corner cases.
> >
> > I think that partial high-availability is as good as no high-availability
> > at all. Therefore, I think we should cancel this RC and create a new one
> > containing a fix for the problem. Moreover, this is not only a problem of
> > the session mode but also for the per job cluster mode. Users simply
> didn't
> > run into the problem, because apparently their JM recovery didn't take
> > longer than 60s.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > this is the first VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0
> > >
> > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > e0a886e9 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9
> >
> > > (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9
> > > <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e0a886e9>*)
> > >
> > > Branch:
> > > release-1.3.0-rc2
> > >
> > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/
> > > <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc2/>*
> > >
> > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> D9839159:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >
> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheflink-1121
> > > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheflink-1121
> > >*
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote ends on Monday (May 29th), 7pm CET.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ...
> > >
> >
>