[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
Locked
[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
 
|
Dear Flink community,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version 1.0 .0. This is the fourth RC. Here is a document to report on the testing and release verification: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 The commit to be voted on (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d Branch: release-1.0.0-rc4 (see https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 ) The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159: http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS The staging repository for this release can be found at: *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069>* ------------------------------------------------------------- The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least three +1 PMC votes are cast. The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... ---------------------------------------------------------- Changes since RC4: commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does not have to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala version properties. commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner hashes. |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email.
The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dear Flink community, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version > 1.0.0. > > This is the fourth RC. > Here is a document to report on the testing and release verification: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > > > The commit to be voted on (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) > 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > > Branch: > release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > ) > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159: > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069>* > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least three > +1 PMC votes are cast. > > The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Changes since RC4: > > commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > > [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > > commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > > [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > > This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly > resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does not have > to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala version > properties. > > commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > > [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing > > commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > > [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner hashes. > > > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
+1
I think we have a winner. :D The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC and I now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 with Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers and TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified that savepoints work in this setup. > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Dear Flink community, >> >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version >> 1.0.0. >> >> This is the fourth RC. >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release verification: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 >> >> >> The commit to be voted on (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d >> >> Branch: >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 >> ) >> >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* >> >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069>* >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least three >> +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Changes since RC4: >> >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 >> >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable >> >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 >> >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin >> >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does not have >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala version >> properties. >> >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 >> >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing >> >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 >> >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner hashes. >> >> >> |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
+1
Checked that the sources don't contain binaries Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job submission Run all examples via FliRTT Tested Kafka 0.9 Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ Run example with RemoteEnvironment Verified SBT quickstarts On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > I think we have a winner. :D > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC and I > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 with > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers and > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified that > savepoints work in this setup. > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > >> Dear Flink community, > >> > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version > >> 1.0.0. > >> > >> This is the fourth RC. > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release verification: > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > >> > >> > >> The commit to be voted on (* > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > >> > >> Branch: > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > >> ) > >> > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > >> > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159: > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > >> > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > >> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >* > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least three > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > >> > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Changes since RC4: > >> > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > >> > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > >> > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > >> > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > >> > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does not > have > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala version > >> properties. > >> > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > >> > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing > >> > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > >> > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner > hashes. > >> > >> > >> > > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
+1
- Checked checksums and signatures - Verified no binaries in source release - Checked that source release is building properly - Build for custom Hadoop version - Ran start scripts - Checked log and out files - Tested in local mode - Tested in cluster mode - Tested on cluster with HDFS - Tested recovery with StreamingStateMachine with Kafka, RocksDB and in standalone HA mode On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job submission > Run all examples via FliRTT > Tested Kafka 0.9 > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > Verified SBT quickstarts > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I think we have a winner. :D >> >> The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC and I >> now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 with >> Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers and >> TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified that >> savepoints work in this setup. >> >> > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. >> > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Dear Flink community, >> >> >> >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version >> >> 1.0.0. >> >> >> >> This is the fourth RC. >> >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release verification: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 >> >> >> >> >> >> The commit to be voted on (* >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >> >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) >> >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d >> >> >> >> Branch: >> >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see >> >> >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 >> >> ) >> >> >> >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >> >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ >> >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* >> >> >> >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint D9839159: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> >> >> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> >> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> >> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> >* >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least three >> >> +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> >> >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 >> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Changes since RC4: >> >> >> >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 >> >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 >> >> >> >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable >> >> >> >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 >> >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >> >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 >> >> >> >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin >> >> >> >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly >> >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does not >> have >> >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala version >> >> properties. >> >> >> >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 >> >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> >> >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 >> >> >> >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing >> >> >> >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f >> >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> >> >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 >> >> >> >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner >> hashes. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
In reply to this post by Till Rohrmann
+1
Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good Run local pseudo cluster with examples Log files look good, no exceptions Tested File State Backend Ran Storm Compatibility Examples -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my opinion) On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job submission > Run all examples via FliRTT > Tested Kafka 0.9 > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > Verified SBT quickstarts > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I think we have a winner. :D > > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC and I > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 with > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers and > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified that > > savepoints work in this setup. > > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Dear Flink community, > > >> > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink > version > > >> 1.0.0. > > >> > > >> This is the fourth RC. > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release verification: > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > > >> > > >> > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > > >> > > >> Branch: > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > > >> > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > > >> ) > > >> > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > > >> > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > D9839159: > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >> > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > >> * > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > >> < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > >* > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least > three > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > > >> > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > >> > > >> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> Changes since RC4: > > >> > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > > >> > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > > >> > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > > >> > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > > >> > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does not > > have > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala > version > > >> properties. > > >> > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > > >> > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing > > >> > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > > >> > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner > > hashes. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local problem
(and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), however I've checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on `flink-runtime`: [ERROR] /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) [ERROR] ^ [ERROR] one error found Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your latest tests? I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests but the issue persists. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good > Run local pseudo cluster with examples > Log files look good, no exceptions > Tested File State Backend > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my opinion) > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job submission > > Run all examples via FliRTT > > Tested Kafka 0.9 > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > > Verified SBT quickstarts > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I think we have a winner. :D > > > > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC > and I > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 with > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers and > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified that > > > savepoints work in this setup. > > > > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Dear Flink community, > > > >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink > > version > > > >> 1.0.0. > > > >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release > verification: > > > >> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > > > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > > > >> > > > >> Branch: > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > > > >> > > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > > > >> ) > > > >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > > > >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > > D9839159: > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > > >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > > >> * > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > > >> < > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > > >* > > > >> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least > > three > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > > > >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: > > > >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > > > >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > > > >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > > > >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > > > >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does not > > > have > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala > > version > > > >> properties. > > > >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > > > >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing > > > >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > > > >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner > > > hashes. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- BR, Stefano Baghino Software Engineer @ Radicalbit |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
Hi!
To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" flag. Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly activated. Can you try that again? Thanks, Stephan On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < [hidden email]> wrote: > I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local problem > (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), however I've > checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install > -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on `flink-runtime`: > > [ERROR] > > /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: > error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala > [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) > [ERROR] ^ > [ERROR] one error found > > Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your latest > tests? > I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests but > the issue persists. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good > > Run local pseudo cluster with examples > > Log files look good, no exceptions > > Tested File State Backend > > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples > > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my opinion) > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job submission > > > Run all examples via FliRTT > > > Tested Kafka 0.9 > > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > > > Verified SBT quickstarts > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > I think we have a winner. :D > > > > > > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC > > and I > > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 > with > > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers > and > > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified that > > > > savepoints work in this setup. > > > > > > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. > > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < > [hidden email]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Dear Flink community, > > > > >> > > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink > > > version > > > > >> 1.0.0. > > > > >> > > > > >> This is the fourth RC. > > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release > > verification: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > > > > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) > > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > > > > >> > > > > >> Branch: > > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > > > > >> ) > > > > >> > > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > > > > >> > > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > > > D9839159: > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > > > >> > > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > > > >> * > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > > > >> < > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > > > >* > > > > >> > > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> > > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at least > > > three > > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > >> > > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > > > > >> > > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> > > > > >> Changes since RC4: > > > > >> > > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > > > > >> > > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > > > > >> > > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > > > > >> > > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > > > > >> > > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly > > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does > not > > > > have > > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala > > > version > > > > >> properties. > > > > >> > > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > > > > >> > > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing > > > > >> > > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > > > > >> > > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner > > > > hashes. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > BR, > Stefano Baghino > > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11"
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi! > > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" flag. > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly activated. > > Can you try that again? > > Thanks, > Stephan > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local problem >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), however >> I've >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on `flink-runtime`: >> >> [ERROR] >> >> /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) >> [ERROR] ^ >> [ERROR] one error found >> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your latest >> tests? >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests but >> the issue persists. >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples >> > Log files look good, no exceptions >> > Tested File State Backend >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my opinion) >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job submission >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email] >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1 >> > > > >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D >> > > > >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC >> > and I >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 >> with >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers >> and >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified >> that >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. >> > > > >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < >> [hidden email]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink >> > > version >> > > > >> 1.0.0. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release >> > verification: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* >> > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >> > > > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Branch: >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 >> > > > >> ) >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >> > > D9839159: >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> > > > >> * >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> > > > >> < >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> > > > >* >> > > > >> >> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at >> least >> > > three >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable >> > > > >> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin >> > > > >> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does >> not >> > > > have >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala >> > > version >> > > > >> properties. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing >> > > > >> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner >> > > > hashes. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> BR, >> Stefano Baghino >> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >> > > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
AFAIK, you should run `tools/change-scala-version.sh 2.11` before running `mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dscala-2.11`.
Regards, Chiwan Park > On Mar 4, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" flag. >> Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly activated. >> >> Can you try that again? >> >> Thanks, >> Stephan >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local problem >>> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), however >>> I've >>> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install >>> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on `flink-runtime`: >>> >>> [ERROR] >>> >>> /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: >>> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala >>> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) >>> [ERROR] ^ >>> [ERROR] one error found >>> >>> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your latest >>> tests? >>> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests but >>> the issue persists. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files >>>> Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good >>>> Run local pseudo cluster with examples >>>> Log files look good, no exceptions >>>> Tested File State Backend >>>> Ran Storm Compatibility Examples >>>> -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my opinion) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Checked that the sources don't contain binaries >>>>> Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job submission >>>>> Run all examples via FliRTT >>>>> Tested Kafka 0.9 >>>>> Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ >>>>> Run example with RemoteEnvironment >>>>> Verified SBT quickstarts >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we have a winner. :D >>>>>> >>>>>> The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this RC >>>> and I >>>>>> now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 >>> with >>>>>> Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers >>> and >>>>>> TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified >>> that >>>>>> savepoints work in this setup. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. >>>>>>> The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < >>> [hidden email]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Flink community, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink >>>>> version >>>>>>>> 1.0.0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is the fourth RC. >>>>>>>> Here is a document to report on the testing and release >>>> verification: >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on (* >>>>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >>>>>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a>*) >>>>>>>> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Branch: >>>>>>>> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 >>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >>>>>>>> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ >>>>>>>> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >>>>> D9839159: >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>>>>> * >>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >>>>>>>> < >>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at >>> least >>>>> three >>>>>>>> +1 PMC votes are cast. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Changes since RC4: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 >>>>>>>> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 >>>>>>>> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are properly >>>>>>>> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom does >>> not >>>>>> have >>>>>>>> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala >>>>> version >>>>>>>> properties. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 >>>>>>>> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f >>>>>>>> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> >>>>>>>> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble HashPartitioner >>>>>> hashes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> BR, >>> Stefano Baghino >>> >>> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >>> >> >> |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
In reply to this post by Stephan Ewen
I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for the
intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" flag. > > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly > activated. > > > > Can you try that again? > > > > Thanks, > > Stephan > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local > problem > >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), however > >> I've > >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install > >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on `flink-runtime`: > >> > >> [ERROR] > >> > >> > /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: > >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala > >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) > >> [ERROR] ^ > >> [ERROR] one error found > >> > >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your latest > >> tests? > >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests but > >> the issue persists. > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good > >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples > >> > Log files look good, no exceptions > >> > Tested File State Backend > >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples > >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my > opinion) > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job > submission > >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT > >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 > >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > [hidden email] > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D > >> > > > > >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this > RC > >> > and I > >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop 2.7 > >> with > >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both JobManagers > >> and > >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified > >> that > >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. > >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < > >> [hidden email]> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Flink > >> > > version > >> > > > >> 1.0.0. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. > >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release > >> > verification: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > >> > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > >> > > > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > >*) > >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Branch: > >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > >> > > > >> ) > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > >> > > D9839159: > >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > >> > > > >> * > >> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >> > > > >> < > >> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >> > > > >* > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at > >> least > >> > > three > >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are > properly > >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom > does > >> not > >> > > > have > >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the Scala > >> > > version > >> > > > >> properties. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble > HashPartitioner > >> > > > hashes. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> BR, > >> Stefano Baghino > >> > >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > >> > > > > > -- BR, Stefano Baghino Software Engineer @ Radicalbit |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
Build successful, thank you.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino < [hidden email]> wrote: > I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for the > intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be > -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > Hi! >> > >> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" flag. >> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly >> activated. >> > >> > Can you try that again? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Stephan >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < >> > [hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local >> problem >> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), however >> >> I've >> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install >> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on `flink-runtime`: >> >> >> >> [ERROR] >> >> >> >> >> /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: >> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala >> >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) >> >> [ERROR] ^ >> >> [ERROR] one error found >> >> >> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your latest >> >> tests? >> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests >> but >> >> the issue persists. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > +1 >> >> > >> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files >> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good >> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples >> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions >> >> > Tested File State Backend >> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples >> >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my >> opinion) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > +1 >> >> > > >> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries >> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job >> submission >> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT >> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 >> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ >> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment >> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts >> >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> [hidden email] >> >> > >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > +1 >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D >> >> > > > >> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this >> RC >> >> > and I >> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop >> 2.7 >> >> with >> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both >> JobManagers >> >> and >> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified >> >> that >> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. >> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < >> >> [hidden email]> >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >> Flink >> >> > > version >> >> > > > >> 1.0.0. >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. >> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release >> >> > verification: >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* >> >> > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >> >> > > > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >> >*) >> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Branch: >> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 >> >> > > > >> ) >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ >> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >> >> > > D9839159: >> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> >> > > > >> * >> >> > > >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> >> > > > >> < >> >> > > >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> >> > > > >* >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at >> >> least >> >> > > three >> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 >> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 >> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 >> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are >> properly >> >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom >> does >> >> not >> >> > > > have >> >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the >> Scala >> >> > > version >> >> > > > >> properties. >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 >> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> >> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f >> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> >> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble >> HashPartitioner >> >> > > > hashes. >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> BR, >> >> Stefano Baghino >> >> >> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >> >> >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > BR, > Stefano Baghino > > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > -- BR, Stefano Baghino Software Engineer @ Radicalbit |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
@Stefano: Yes, would be great to have a fix in the docs and pointers
on how to improve the docs for this. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Stefano Baghino <[hidden email]> wrote: > Build successful, thank you. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for the >> intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be >> -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi! >>> > >>> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" flag. >>> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly >>> activated. >>> > >>> > Can you try that again? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Stephan >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < >>> > [hidden email]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local >>> problem >>> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), however >>> >> I've >>> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install >>> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on `flink-runtime`: >>> >> >>> >> [ERROR] >>> >> >>> >> >>> /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: >>> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala >>> >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) >>> >> [ERROR] ^ >>> >> [ERROR] one error found >>> >> >>> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your latest >>> >> tests? >>> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests >>> but >>> >> the issue persists. >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > +1 >>> >> > >>> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files >>> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good >>> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples >>> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions >>> >> > Tested File State Backend >>> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples >>> >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my >>> opinion) >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > > +1 >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries >>> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job >>> submission >>> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT >>> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 >>> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ >>> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment >>> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < >>> [hidden email] >>> >> > >>> >> > > wrote: >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > +1 >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for this >>> RC >>> >> > and I >>> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop >>> 2.7 >>> >> with >>> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both >>> JobManagers >>> >> and >>> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also verified >>> >> that >>> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. >>> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth RC. >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < >>> >> [hidden email]> >>> >> > > > wrote: >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >>> Flink >>> >> > > version >>> >> > > > >> 1.0.0. >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. >>> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release >>> >> > verification: >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* >>> >> > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >>> >> > > > >> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >>> >*) >>> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Branch: >>> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 >>> >> > > > >> ) >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >>> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ >>> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >>> >> > > D9839159: >>> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>> >> > > > >> * >>> >> > > >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >>> >> > > > >> < >>> >> > > >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >>> >> > > > >* >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of at >>> >> least >>> >> > > three >>> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 >>> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 >>> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 >>> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are >>> properly >>> >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom >>> does >>> >> not >>> >> > > > have >>> >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the >>> Scala >>> >> > > version >>> >> > > > >> properties. >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 >>> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f >>> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble >>> HashPartitioner >>> >> > > > hashes. >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> BR, >>> >> Stefano Baghino >>> >> >>> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> BR, >> Stefano Baghino >> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >> > > > > -- > BR, > Stefano Baghino > > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
Are the docs actually wrong?
In the docs, it says to run the "tools/change-scala-version.sh 2.11" script first (which implicitly adds the "-Dscala-2.11" flag. I thought this problem arose because neither the flag was specified, nor the script run. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > @Stefano: Yes, would be great to have a fix in the docs and pointers > on how to improve the docs for this. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Stefano Baghino > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Build successful, thank you. > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for the > >> intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be > >> -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: > >> > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >>> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" > >>> > >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hi! > >>> > > >>> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" > flag. > >>> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly > >>> activated. > >>> > > >>> > Can you try that again? > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > Stephan > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < > >>> > [hidden email]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local > >>> problem > >>> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), > however > >>> >> I've > >>> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install > >>> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on > `flink-runtime`: > >>> >> > >>> >> [ERROR] > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: > >>> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala > >>> >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) > >>> >> [ERROR] ^ > >>> >> [ERROR] one error found > >>> >> > >>> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your > latest > >>> >> tests? > >>> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests > >>> but > >>> >> the issue persists. > >>> >> > >>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > >>> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > +1 > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > >>> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good > >>> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples > >>> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions > >>> >> > Tested File State Backend > >>> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples > >>> >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my > >>> opinion) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann < > [hidden email]> > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > +1 > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > >>> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job > >>> submission > >>> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT > >>> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 > >>> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > >>> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > >>> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > >>> [hidden email] > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > wrote: > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > +1 > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for > this > >>> RC > >>> >> > and I > >>> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop > >>> 2.7 > >>> >> with > >>> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both > >>> JobManagers > >>> >> and > >>> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also > verified > >>> >> that > >>> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger < > [hidden email]> > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. > >>> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth > RC. > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < > >>> >> [hidden email]> > >>> >> > > > wrote: > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > >>> Flink > >>> >> > > version > >>> >> > > > >> 1.0.0. > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. > >>> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release > >>> >> > verification: > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > >>> >> > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > >>> >> > > > >> < > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > >>> >*) > >>> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> Branch: > >>> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > >>> >> > > > >> ) > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > >>> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > >>> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with > fingerprint > >>> >> > > D9839159: > >>> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > >>> >> > > > >> * > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >>> >> > > > >> < > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >>> >> > > > >* > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of > at > >>> >> least > >>> >> > > three > >>> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > >>> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are > >>> properly > >>> >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom > >>> does > >>> >> not > >>> >> > > > have > >>> >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the > >>> Scala > >>> >> > > version > >>> >> > > > >> properties. > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble > >>> HashPartitioner > >>> >> > > > hashes. > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> BR, > >>> >> Stefano Baghino > >>> >> > >>> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> BR, > >> Stefano Baghino > >> > >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > BR, > > Stefano Baghino > > > > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
I'll switch back to Scala 2.10 and try again, I was sure I ran the script
before running the build; maybe something went wrong and I didn't notice. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Are the docs actually wrong? > > In the docs, it says to run the "tools/change-scala-version.sh 2.11" script > first (which implicitly adds the "-Dscala-2.11" flag. > > I thought this problem arose because neither the flag was specified, nor > the script run. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > @Stefano: Yes, would be great to have a fix in the docs and pointers > > on how to improve the docs for this. > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Stefano Baghino > > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Build successful, thank you. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino < > > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > >> I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for > the > > >> intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be > > >> -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: > > >> > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions > > >> > > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > Hi! > > >>> > > > >>> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" > > flag. > > >>> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly > > >>> activated. > > >>> > > > >>> > Can you try that again? > > >>> > > > >>> > Thanks, > > >>> > Stephan > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < > > >>> > [hidden email]> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local > > >>> problem > > >>> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), > > however > > >>> >> I've > > >>> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean > install > > >>> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on > > `flink-runtime`: > > >>> >> > > >>> >> [ERROR] > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > > > /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: > > >>> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala > > >>> >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) > > >>> >> [ERROR] ^ > > >>> >> [ERROR] one error found > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your > > latest > > >>> >> tests? > > >>> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the > tests > > >>> but > > >>> >> the issue persists. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > +1 > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > > >>> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good > > >>> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples > > >>> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions > > >>> >> > Tested File State Backend > > >>> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples > > >>> >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my > > >>> opinion) > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann < > > [hidden email]> > > >>> >> > wrote: > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > +1 > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > > >>> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job > > >>> submission > > >>> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT > > >>> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 > > >>> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > > >>> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > > >>> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>> [hidden email] > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > wrote: > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > +1 > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for > > this > > >>> RC > > >>> >> > and I > > >>> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on > Hadoop > > >>> 2.7 > > >>> >> with > > >>> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both > > >>> JobManagers > > >>> >> and > > >>> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also > > verified > > >>> >> that > > >>> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger < > > [hidden email]> > > >>> >> > wrote: > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the > email. > > >>> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the > fifth > > RC. > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < > > >>> >> [hidden email]> > > >>> >> > > > wrote: > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as > Apache > > >>> Flink > > >>> >> > > version > > >>> >> > > > >> 1.0.0. > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. > > >>> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release > > >>> >> > verification: > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > > >>> >> > > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > > >>> >> > > > >> < > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > > >>> >*) > > >>> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> Branch: > > >>> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > > >>> >> > > > >> ) > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > >>> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > > >>> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with > > fingerprint > > >>> >> > > D9839159: > > >>> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > >>> >> > > > >> * > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > >>> >> > > > >> < > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > >>> >> > > > >* > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of > > at > > >>> >> least > > >>> >> > > three > > >>> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > > >>> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are > > >>> properly > > >>> >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root > pom > > >>> does > > >>> >> not > > >>> >> > > > have > > >>> >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the > > >>> Scala > > >>> >> > > version > > >>> >> > > > >> properties. > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on > hashing > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > > >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble > > >>> HashPartitioner > > >>> >> > > > hashes. > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> -- > > >>> >> BR, > > >>> >> Stefano Baghino > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > > >>> >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> BR, > > >> Stefano Baghino > > >> > > >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > BR, > > > Stefano Baghino > > > > > > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > > > -- BR, Stefano Baghino Software Engineer @ Radicalbit |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
In reply to this post by Stephan Ewen
You are right. Just checked the docs. They are correct.
@Stefano: the docs say that you first change the binary version via the script and then you can specify the language version via scala.version. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Are the docs actually wrong? > > In the docs, it says to run the "tools/change-scala-version.sh 2.11" script > first (which implicitly adds the "-Dscala-2.11" flag. > > I thought this problem arose because neither the flag was specified, nor > the script run. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> @Stefano: Yes, would be great to have a fix in the docs and pointers >> on how to improve the docs for this. >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Stefano Baghino >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > Build successful, thank you. >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino < >> > [hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> >> I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for the >> >> intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be >> >> -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: >> >> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Hi! >> >>> > >> >>> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" >> flag. >> >>> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly >> >>> activated. >> >>> > >> >>> > Can you try that again? >> >>> > >> >>> > Thanks, >> >>> > Stephan >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < >> >>> > [hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local >> >>> problem >> >>> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), >> however >> >>> >> I've >> >>> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean install >> >>> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on >> `flink-runtime`: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> [ERROR] >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: >> >>> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala >> >>> >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) >> >>> >> [ERROR] ^ >> >>> >> [ERROR] one error found >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your >> latest >> >>> >> tests? >> >>> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the tests >> >>> but >> >>> >> the issue persists. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > +1 >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files >> >>> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good >> >>> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples >> >>> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions >> >>> >> > Tested File State Backend >> >>> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples >> >>> >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my >> >>> opinion) >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann < >> [hidden email]> >> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > > +1 >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries >> >>> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job >> >>> submission >> >>> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT >> >>> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 >> >>> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ >> >>> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment >> >>> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> >>> [hidden email] >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > > wrote: >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > > +1 >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for >> this >> >>> RC >> >>> >> > and I >> >>> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on Hadoop >> >>> 2.7 >> >>> >> with >> >>> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both >> >>> JobManagers >> >>> >> and >> >>> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also >> verified >> >>> >> that >> >>> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger < >> [hidden email]> >> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the email. >> >>> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the fifth >> RC. >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < >> >>> >> [hidden email]> >> >>> >> > > > wrote: >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >> >>> Flink >> >>> >> > > version >> >>> >> > > > >> 1.0.0. >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. >> >>> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release >> >>> >> > verification: >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* >> >>> >> > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >> >>> >> > > > >> < >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a >> >>> >*) >> >>> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> Branch: >> >>> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 >> >>> >> > > > >> ) >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >> >>> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ >> >>> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with >> fingerprint >> >>> >> > > D9839159: >> >>> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> >>> >> > > > >> * >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> >>> >> > > > >> < >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 >> >>> >> > > > >* >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of >> at >> >>> >> least >> >>> >> > > three >> >>> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 >> >>> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are >> >>> properly >> >>> >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root pom >> >>> does >> >>> >> not >> >>> >> > > > have >> >>> >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the >> >>> Scala >> >>> >> > > version >> >>> >> > > > >> properties. >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on hashing >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble >> >>> HashPartitioner >> >>> >> > > > hashes. >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> BR, >> >>> >> Stefano Baghino >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> BR, >> >> Stefano Baghino >> >> >> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > BR, >> > Stefano Baghino >> > >> > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit >> |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
Ok, I switched back to 2.10 with the script and tried with both the
explicit call to the script back to 2.11 and with the implicit call via -Dscala-11 worked, I really don't know what happened before. Thank you for the help, sorry for disturbing the voting process. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > You are right. Just checked the docs. They are correct. > > @Stefano: the docs say that you first change the binary version via > the script and then you can specify the language version via > scala.version. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Are the docs actually wrong? > > > > In the docs, it says to run the "tools/change-scala-version.sh 2.11" > script > > first (which implicitly adds the "-Dscala-2.11" flag. > > > > I thought this problem arose because neither the flag was specified, nor > > the script run. > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> @Stefano: Yes, would be great to have a fix in the docs and pointers > >> on how to improve the docs for this. > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Stefano Baghino > >> <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > Build successful, thank you. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino < > >> > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for > the > >> >> intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be > >> >> -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: > >> >> > >> > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > Hi! > >> >>> > > >> >>> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11" > >> flag. > >> >>> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly > >> >>> activated. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Can you try that again? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Thanks, > >> >>> > Stephan > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < > >> >>> > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local > >> >>> problem > >> >>> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), > >> however > >> >>> >> I've > >> >>> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean > install > >> >>> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on > >> `flink-runtime`: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> [ERROR] > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > >> > /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: > >> >>> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala > >> >>> >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) > >> >>> >> [ERROR] ^ > >> >>> >> [ERROR] one error found > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your > >> latest > >> >>> >> tests? > >> >>> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the > tests > >> >>> but > >> >>> >> the issue persists. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > +1 > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > >> >>> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good > >> >>> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples > >> >>> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions > >> >>> >> > Tested File State Backend > >> >>> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples > >> >>> >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my > >> >>> opinion) > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann < > >> [hidden email]> > >> >>> >> > wrote: > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > +1 > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > >> >>> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job > >> >>> submission > >> >>> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT > >> >>> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 > >> >>> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > >> >>> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > >> >>> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > >> >>> [hidden email] > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > wrote: > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > +1 > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for > >> this > >> >>> RC > >> >>> >> > and I > >> >>> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on > Hadoop > >> >>> 2.7 > >> >>> >> with > >> >>> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both > >> >>> JobManagers > >> >>> >> and > >> >>> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also > >> verified > >> >>> >> that > >> >>> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger < > >> [hidden email]> > >> >>> >> > wrote: > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the > email. > >> >>> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the > fifth > >> RC. > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < > >> >>> >> [hidden email]> > >> >>> >> > > > wrote: > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as > Apache > >> >>> Flink > >> >>> >> > > version > >> >>> >> > > > >> 1.0.0. > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. > >> >>> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release > >> >>> >> > verification: > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > >> >>> >> > > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > >> >>> >> > > > >> < > >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > >> >>> >*) > >> >>> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Branch: > >> >>> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > >> >>> >> > > > >> ) > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > >> >>> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > >> >>> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with > >> fingerprint > >> >>> >> > > D9839159: > >> >>> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > >> >>> >> > > > >> * > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >> >>> >> > > > >> < > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > >> >>> >> > > > >* > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority > of > >> at > >> >>> >> least > >> >>> >> > > three > >> >>> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > >> >>> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom are > >> >>> properly > >> >>> >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root > pom > >> >>> does > >> >>> >> not > >> >>> >> > > > have > >> >>> >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds > the > >> >>> Scala > >> >>> >> > > version > >> >>> >> > > > >> properties. > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on > hashing > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble > >> >>> HashPartitioner > >> >>> >> > > > hashes. > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> -- > >> >>> >> BR, > >> >>> >> Stefano Baghino > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> BR, > >> >> Stefano Baghino > >> >> > >> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > BR, > >> > Stefano Baghino > >> > > >> > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > >> > -- BR, Stefano Baghino Software Engineer @ Radicalbit |
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC5)
|
|
@Stefano: No problem. Always happy when people test releases :-)
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Stefano Baghino < [hidden email]> wrote: > Ok, I switched back to 2.10 with the script and tried with both the > explicit call to the script back to 2.11 and with the implicit call via > -Dscala-11 worked, I really don't know what happened before. Thank you for > the help, sorry for disturbing the voting process. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > You are right. Just checked the docs. They are correct. > > > > @Stefano: the docs say that you first change the binary version via > > the script and then you can specify the language version via > > scala.version. > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Are the docs actually wrong? > > > > > > In the docs, it says to run the "tools/change-scala-version.sh 2.11" > > script > > > first (which implicitly adds the "-Dscala-2.11" flag. > > > > > > I thought this problem arose because neither the flag was specified, > nor > > > the script run. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > >> @Stefano: Yes, would be great to have a fix in the docs and pointers > > >> on how to improve the docs for this. > > >> > > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Stefano Baghino > > >> <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >> > Build successful, thank you. > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino < > > >> > [hidden email]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry > for > > the > > >> >> intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be > > >> >> -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them: > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11" > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > > >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Hi! > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the > "-Dscala.version=2.11" > > >> flag. > > >> >>> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly > > >> >>> activated. > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > Can you try that again? > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > Thanks, > > >> >>> > Stephan > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino < > > >> >>> > [hidden email]> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a > local > > >> >>> problem > > >> >>> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked), > > >> however > > >> >>> >> I've > > >> >>> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean > > install > > >> >>> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on > > >> `flink-runtime`: > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> [ERROR] > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703: > > >> >>> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of > Scala > > >> >>> >> [ERROR] assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived) > > >> >>> >> [ERROR] ^ > > >> >>> >> [ERROR] one error found > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to > your > > >> latest > > >> >>> >> tests? > > >> >>> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the > > tests > > >> >>> but > > >> >>> >> the issue persists. > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen < > [hidden email]> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > +1 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > > >> >>> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good > > >> >>> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples > > >> >>> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions > > >> >>> >> > Tested File State Backend > > >> >>> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples > > >> >>> >> > -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in > my > > >> >>> opinion) > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann < > > >> [hidden email]> > > >> >>> >> > wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > +1 > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries > > >> >>> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job > > >> >>> submission > > >> >>> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT > > >> >>> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9 > > >> >>> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ > > >> >>> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment > > >> >>> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >> >>> [hidden email] > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > +1 > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold > for > > >> this > > >> >>> RC > > >> >>> >> > and I > > >> >>> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on > > Hadoop > > >> >>> 2.7 > > >> >>> >> with > > >> >>> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both > > >> >>> JobManagers > > >> >>> >> and > > >> >>> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also > > >> verified > > >> >>> >> that > > >> >>> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup. > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger < > > >> [hidden email]> > > >> >>> >> > wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the > > email. > > >> >>> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the > > fifth > > >> RC. > > >> >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger < > > >> >>> >> [hidden email]> > > >> >>> >> > > > wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community, > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as > > Apache > > >> >>> Flink > > >> >>> >> > > version > > >> >>> >> > > > >> 1.0.0. > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC. > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and > release > > >> >>> >> > verification: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (* > > >> >>> >> > > > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > > >> >>> >> > > > >> < > > >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a > > >> >>> >*) > > >> >>> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Branch: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> ) > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/ > > >> >>> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>* > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with > > >> fingerprint > > >> >>> >> > > D9839159: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found > at: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> * > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> < > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069 > > >> >>> >> > > > >* > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority > > of > > >> at > > >> >>> >> least > > >> >>> >> > > three > > >> >>> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast. > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET. > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [maven] add module to force execution of Shade > plugin > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> This ensures that all properties of the root pom > are > > >> >>> properly > > >> >>> >> > > > >> resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our > root > > pom > > >> >>> does > > >> >>> >> not > > >> >>> >> > > > have > > >> >>> >> > > > >> to depend on a Scala version just because it holds > > the > > >> >>> Scala > > >> >>> >> > > version > > >> >>> >> > > > >> properties. > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on > > hashing > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <[hidden email]> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> Date: Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100 > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble > > >> >>> HashPartitioner > > >> >>> >> > > > hashes. > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> -- > > >> >>> >> BR, > > >> >>> >> Stefano Baghino > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> BR, > > >> >> Stefano Baghino > > >> >> > > >> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > BR, > > >> > Stefano Baghino > > >> > > > >> > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > > >> > > > > > > -- > BR, > Stefano Baghino > > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit > |
«
Return to (DEPRECATED) Apache Flink Mailing List archive.
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |