[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)

[mxm]

@Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
However, we don't have a better fix.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. [phone]
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
>> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's just
>> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
>> should.
>>
>> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
>> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
>> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Sachin Goel
>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> m. [phone]
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
>>>
>>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
>>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
>>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
>>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
>>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
>>> > are operator-level numbers?
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status of
>>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
>>> > number
>>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
>>> > consistency?
>>> > >
>>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>>> > > m. [phone]
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the
>>> text
>>> > in
>>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
>>> > render
>>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while
>>> for
>>> > the
>>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
>>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>>> > >> m. [phone]
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>>> > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> See
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>>> > >>> vs.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> -Vasia.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
>>> class
>>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
>>> which
>>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> > >>> > wrote:
>>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
>>> > around
>>> > >>> to
>>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant
>>> place
>>> > in
>>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
>>> > handle
>>> > >>> > this.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>>> > >>> > > m. [phone]
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>>> > >>> > [hidden email]
>>> > >>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>>> > >>> > >> .
>>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
>>> circles
>>> > >>> mark
>>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the squares
>>> > mark
>>> > >>> the
>>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
>>> Which
>>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
>>> > >>> difference?
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in for
>>> > the
>>> > >>> next
>>> > >>> > >> RC.
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>>> > >>> > >> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
>>> each
>>> > >>> status
>>> > >>> > >> show
>>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
>>> values
>>> > >>> than
>>> > >>> > the
>>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
>>> hidden
>>> > >>> and I
>>> > >>> > >> > cannot
>>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for each
>>> > >>> operator:
>>> > >>> > >> bytes
>>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>>> > >>> [hidden email]>
>>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log and
>>> > >>> stdout
>>> > >>> > tabs
>>> > >>> > >> > for
>>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished yet.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>>> > >>> > >> [hidden email]>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release :)
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>>> > >>> > [hidden email]>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
>>> supposed
>>> > to
>>> > >>> > show?
>>> > >>> > >> No
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same (operator=1,
>>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
>>> > >>> > [hidden email]
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>>
>>> >
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected by
>>> the
>>> > >>> > changes
>>> > >>> > >> of
>>> > >>> > >> > the
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
>>> Kalavri <
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
>>> using
>>> > the
>>> > >>> > >> > previous
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian Michels
>>> <
>>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]>
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
>>> candidate
>>> > as
>>> > >>> > Apache
>>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
>>> )
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
>>> found
>>> > >>> at:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the key
>>> > with
>>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be
>>> > found
>>> > >>> > at:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
>>> passes
>>> > >>> if a
>>> > >>> > >> > majority
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
>>> > 0.10.0
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on top
>>> of
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide default
>>> > >>> required
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
>>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
>>> > artifacts
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
>>> unexpected
>>> > >>> leader
>>> > >>> > >> > address
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in
>>> Path in
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >> > >>
>>> > >>> > >> >
>>> > >>> > >>
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

[Sachin Goel]

Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome this
way.
Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.

-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. [phone]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
> However, we don't have a better fix.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
> >
> > -- Sachin Goel
> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > m. [phone]
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's
> just
> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
> >> should.
> >>
> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Sachin Goel
> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> m. [phone]
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
> >>>
> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
> [hidden email]>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status
> of
> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
> >>> > number
> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> >>> > consistency?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >>> > > m. [phone]
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >>> [hidden email]>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the
> >>> text
> >>> > in
> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
> >>> > render
> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while
> >>> for
> >>> > the
> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >>> > >> m. [phone]
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >>> > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> See
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> >>> > >>> vs.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
> >>> class
> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
> >>> which
> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >>> > [hidden email]>
> >>> > >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
> >>> > around
> >>> > >>> to
> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant
> >>> place
> >>> > in
> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
> >>> > handle
> >>> > >>> > this.
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >>> > >>> > > m. [phone]
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> >>> > >>> > >> .
> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
> >>> [hidden email]>
> >>> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
> >>> circles
> >>> > >>> mark
> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
> squares
> >>> > mark
> >>> > >>> the
> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> >>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
> >>> Which
> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
> >>> > >>> difference?
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in
> for
> >>> > the
> >>> > >>> next
> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >>> > >>> > >> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
> >>> each
> >>> > >>> status
> >>> > >>> > >> show
> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
> >>> values
> >>> > >>> than
> >>> > >>> > the
> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
> >>> hidden
> >>> > >>> and I
> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for
> each
> >>> > >>> operator:
> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> >>> > >>> [hidden email]>
> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log
> and
> >>> > >>> stdout
> >>> > >>> > tabs
> >>> > >>> > >> > for
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished
> yet.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >>> > >>> > >> [hidden email]>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release
> :)
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
> >>> supposed
> >>> > to
> >>> > >>> > show?
> >>> > >>> > >> No
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
> (operator=1,
> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected
> by
> >>> the
> >>> > >>> > changes
> >>> > >>> > >> of
> >>> > >>> > >> > the
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
> >>> Kalavri <
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
> >>> using
> >>> > the
> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
> Michels
> >>> <
> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]>
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
> >>> candidate
> >>> > as
> >>> > >>> > Apache
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> >>> )
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
> >>> found
> >>> > >>> at:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the
> key
> >>> > with
> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release
> can be
> >>> > found
> >>> > >>> > at:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
> >>> passes
> >>> > >>> if a
> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
> >>> > 0.10.0
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
> ...
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on
> top
> >>> of
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
> default
> >>> > >>> required
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
> >>> > artifacts
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
> >>> unexpected
> >>> > >>> leader
> >>> > >>> > >> > address
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in
> >>> Path in
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> >
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

[mxm]

Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the
normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather
wait for a proper fix.

Now
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing
Afterwards
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome this
> way.
> Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
>
> -- Sachin Goel
> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> m. [phone]
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
>> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
>> However, we don't have a better fix.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
>> >
>> > -- Sachin Goel
>> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > m. [phone]
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
>> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's
>> just
>> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
>> >> should.
>> >>
>> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox, chrome
>> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild flink-runtime-web
>> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -- Sachin Goel
>> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >> m. [phone]
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there, yes.
>> >>>
>> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job view)
>> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
>> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
>> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are displayed.
>> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that these
>> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> [hidden email]>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the status
>> of
>> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show the
>> >>> > number
>> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
>> >>> > consistency?
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >>> > > m. [phone]
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> [hidden email]>
>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying the
>> >>> text
>> >>> > in
>> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being used to
>> >>> > render
>> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered, while
>> >>> for
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
>> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >>> > >> m. [phone]
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> >>> > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> See
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>> >>> > >>> vs.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a long
>> >>> class
>> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your job
>> >>> which
>> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> > [hidden email]>
>> >>> > >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting wrapped
>> >>> > around
>> >>> > >>> to
>> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the relevant
>> >>> place
>> >>> > in
>> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably meant to
>> >>> > handle
>> >>> > >>> > this.
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> >>> > >>> > > m. [phone]
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
>> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring to:
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>> >>> > >>> > >> .
>> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
>> >>> [hidden email]>
>> >>> > >>> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :) The
>> >>> circles
>> >>> > >>> mark
>> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
>> squares
>> >>> > mark
>> >>> > >>> the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>> >>> > >>> > >> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on Firefox.
>> >>> Which
>> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make any
>> >>> > >>> difference?
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them in
>> for
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > >>> next
>> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> >>> > >>> > >> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of tasks in
>> >>> each
>> >>> > >>> status
>> >>> > >>> > >> show
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get different
>> >>> values
>> >>> > >>> than
>> >>> > >>> > the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information is
>> >>> hidden
>> >>> > >>> and I
>> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for
>> each
>> >>> > >>> operator:
>> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using Firefox.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> > >>> [hidden email]>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy log
>> and
>> >>> > >>> stdout
>> >>> > >>> > tabs
>> >>> > >>> > >> > for
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished
>> yet.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> >>> > >>> > >> [hidden email]>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the release
>> :)
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure either.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface :)
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
>> >>> supposed
>> >>> > to
>> >>> > >>> > show?
>> >>> > >>> > >> No
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
>> (operator=1,
>> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian Michels <
>> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are unaffected
>> by
>> >>> the
>> >>> > >>> > changes
>> >>> > >>> > >> of
>> >>> > >>> > >> > the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
>> >>> Kalavri <
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are we
>> >>> using
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
>> Michels
>> >>> <
>> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]>
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
>> >>> candidate
>> >>> > as
>> >>> > >>> > Apache
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
>> >>> )
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be
>> >>> found
>> >>> > >>> at:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the
>> key
>> >>> > with
>> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release
>> can be
>> >>> > found
>> >>> > >>> > at:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
>> >>> passes
>> >>> > >>> if a
>> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30, 2015.
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
>> >>> > 0.10.0
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
>> ...
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on
>> top
>> >>> of
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
>> default
>> >>> > >>> required
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
>> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
>> >>> > artifacts
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
>> >>> unexpected
>> >>> > >>> leader
>> >>> > >>> > >> > address
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces in
>> >>> Path in
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>> >
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>

[Till Rohrmann]

-1 from my side. I just found a serious issue with the KryoSerializer
(FLINK-2800) which in some cases produced duplicated elements or corrupted
data. I opened a PR to fix the issue (
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1308).

Cheers,
Till
​

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the
> normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather
> wait for a proper fix.
>
> Now
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing
> Afterwards
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome
> this
> > way.
> > Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
> >
> > -- Sachin Goel
> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > m. [phone]
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
> >> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
> >> However, we don't have a better fix.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
> >> >
> >> > -- Sachin Goel
> >> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> > m. [phone]
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <
> [hidden email]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
> >> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name. It's
> >> just
> >> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know if I
> >> >> should.
> >> >>
> >> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox,
> chrome
> >> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild
> flink-runtime-web
> >> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -- Sachin Goel
> >> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >> m. [phone]
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there,
> yes.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job
> view)
> >> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> >> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> >> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are
> displayed.
> >> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that
> these
> >> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >> [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the
> status
> >> of
> >> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however show
> the
> >> >>> > number
> >> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> >> >>> > consistency?
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >>> > > m. [phone]
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > > wrote:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying
> the
> >> >>> text
> >> >>> > in
> >> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being
> used to
> >> >>> > render
> >> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered,
> while
> >> >>> for
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it now.
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
> >> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >>> > >> m. [phone]
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> >>> > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> See
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> >> >>> > >>> vs.
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <
> [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a
> long
> >> >>> class
> >> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your
> job
> >> >>> which
> >> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> > [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting
> wrapped
> >> >>> > around
> >> >>> > >>> to
> >> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the
> relevant
> >> >>> place
> >> >>> > in
> >> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably
> meant to
> >> >>> > handle
> >> >>> > >>> > this.
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> >> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> >> >>> > >>> > > m. [phone]
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
> >> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> >> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring
> to:
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> >> >>> > >>> > >> .
> >> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
> >> >>> [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :)
> The
> >> >>> circles
> >> >>> > >>> mark
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
> >> squares
> >> >>> > mark
> >> >>> > >>> the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on
> Firefox.
> >> >>> Which
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make
> any
> >> >>> > >>> difference?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull them
> in
> >> for
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > >>> next
> >> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web interface.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of
> tasks in
> >> >>> each
> >> >>> > >>> status
> >> >>> > >>> > >> show
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get
> different
> >> >>> values
> >> >>> > >>> than
> >> >>> > >>> > the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information
> is
> >> >>> hidden
> >> >>> > >>> and I
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns for
> >> each
> >> >>> > >>> operator:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using
> Firefox.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> > >>> [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy
> log
> >> and
> >> >>> > >>> stdout
> >> >>> > >>> > tabs
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > for
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been finished
> >> yet.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the
> release
> >> :)
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> >> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure
> either.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web interface
> :)
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
> >> >>> supposed
> >> >>> > to
> >> >>> > >>> > show?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> No
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
> >> (operator=1,
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian
> Michels <
> >> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are
> unaffected
> >> by
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> > >>> > changes
> >> >>> > >>> > >> of
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
> >> >>> Kalavri <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or are
> we
> >> >>> using
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
> >> Michels
> >> >>> <
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
> >> >>> candidate
> >> >>> > as
> >> >>> > >>> > Apache
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> >> >>> )
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on
> can be
> >> >>> found
> >> >>> > >>> at:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with
> the
> >> key
> >> >>> > with
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release
> >> can be
> >> >>> > found
> >> >>> > >>> > at:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours
> and
> >> >>> passes
> >> >>> > >>> if a
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30,
> 2015.
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache
> Flink
> >> >>> > 0.10.0
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package
> because
> >> ...
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added on
> >> top
> >> >>> of
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
> >> default
> >> >>> > >>> required
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
> >> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded version
> >> >>> > artifacts
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
> >> >>> unexpected
> >> >>> > >>> leader
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > address
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces
> in
> >> >>> Path in
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> >> >>> > >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>> >
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

[mxm]

Thanks for reporting and providing a fix, Till! We have also fixed two
issues with the new job manager web frontend and pushed them to the
release-0.10 branch. Please review these changes in the new release
candidate.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

> -1 from my side. I just found a serious issue with the KryoSerializer
> (FLINK-2800) which in some cases produced duplicated elements or corrupted
> data. I opened a PR to fix the issue (
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1308).
>
> Cheers,
> Till
> ​
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the
> > normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather
> > wait for a proper fix.
> >
> > Now
> >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing
> > Afterwards
> >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome
> > this
> > > way.
> > > Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
> > >
> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > > m. [phone]
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
> > >> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
> > >> However, we don't have a better fix.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <
> [hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
> > >> >
> > >> > -- Sachin Goel
> > >> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> > m. [phone]
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
> > >> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name.
> It's
> > >> just
> > >> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know
> if I
> > >> >> should.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox,
> > chrome
> > >> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild
> > flink-runtime-web
> > >> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >> m. [phone]
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice there,
> > yes.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job
> > view)
> > >> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page, and
> > >> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
> > >> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are
> > displayed.
> > >> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that
> > these
> > >> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > >> [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the
> > status
> > >> of
> > >> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however
> show
> > the
> > >> >>> > number
> > >> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
> > >> >>> > consistency?
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >>> > > m. [phone]
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather ellipsifying
> > the
> > >> >>> text
> > >> >>> > in
> > >> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being
> > used to
> > >> >>> > render
> > >> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered,
> > while
> > >> >>> for
> > >> >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it
> now.
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >>> > >> m. [phone]
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> >>> > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> See
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
> > >> >>> > >>> vs.
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of a
> > long
> > >> >>> class
> > >> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from your
> > job
> > >> >>> which
> > >> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> > [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting
> > wrapped
> > >> >>> > around
> > >> >>> > >>> to
> > >> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the
> > relevant
> > >> >>> place
> > >> >>> > in
> > >> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably
> > meant to
> > >> >>> > handle
> > >> >>> > >>> > this.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
> > >> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > >> >>> > >>> > > m. [phone]
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm referring
> > to:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> .
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
> > >> >>> [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > >>> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :)
> > The
> > >> >>> circles
> > >> >>> > >>> mark
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
> > >> squares
> > >> >>> > mark
> > >> >>> > >>> the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on
> > Firefox.
> > >> >>> Which
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make
> > any
> > >> >>> > >>> difference?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull
> them
> > in
> > >> for
> > >> >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> next
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web
> interface.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of
> > tasks in
> > >> >>> each
> > >> >>> > >>> status
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> show
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get
> > different
> > >> >>> values
> > >> >>> > >>> than
> > >> >>> > >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some information
> > is
> > >> >>> hidden
> > >> >>> > >>> and I
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns
> for
> > >> each
> > >> >>> > >>> operator:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using
> > Firefox.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> > >>> [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the dummy
> > log
> > >> and
> > >> >>> > >>> stdout
> > >> >>> > >>> > tabs
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > for
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been
> finished
> > >> yet.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the
> > release
> > >> :)
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
> > >> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure
> > either.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web
> interface
> > :)
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics" tab
> > >> >>> supposed
> > >> >>> > to
> > >> >>> > >>> > show?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> No
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
> > >> (operator=1,
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian
> > Michels <
> > >> >>> > >>> > [hidden email]
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are
> > unaffected
> > >> by
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> > >>> > changes
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> of
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vasiliki
> > >> >>> Kalavri <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or
> are
> > we
> > >> >>> using
> > >> >>> > the
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
> > >> Michels
> > >> >>> <
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > [hidden email]>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following
> > >> >>> candidate
> > >> >>> > as
> > >> >>> > >>> > Apache
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> > >> >>> )
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on
> > can be
> > >> >>> found
> > >> >>> > >>> at:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with
> > the
> > >> key
> > >> >>> > with
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this
> release
> > >> can be
> > >> >>> > found
> > >> >>> > >>> > at:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours
> > and
> > >> >>> passes
> > >> >>> > >>> if a
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30,
> > 2015.
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache
> > Flink
> > >> >>> > 0.10.0
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package
> > because
> > >> ...
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been added
> on
> > >> top
> > >> >>> of
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime] Provide
> > >> default
> > >> >>> > >>> required
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
> > >> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded
> version
> > >> >>> > artifacts
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
> > >> >>> unexpected
> > >> >>> > >>> leader
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > address
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with spaces
> > in
> > >> >>> Path in
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>> >
> > >> >>> > >>>
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>