[VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
16 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song-2
Hi everyone,

Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.12.1,
as follows:

[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)

The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
* website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement blog
post [6].

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.

Thanks,
Xintong Song

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
[5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
[6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
<https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Matthias
-1 (non-binding)

Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this is a
problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492 [2].

Best,
Matthias

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.12.1,
> as follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement blog
> post [6].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Xintong Song
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.

@Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> -1 (non-binding)
>
> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this is a
> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492 [2].
>
> Best,
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> 1.12.1,
> > as follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
> be
> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> blog
> > post [6].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Xintong Song
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> > [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
@Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed a bug.

I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.

At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the release
candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next release
candidate.

The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
>
> @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> -1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this is a
>> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492 [2].
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>> 1.12.1,
>> > as follows:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
>> be
>> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
>> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
>> blog
>> > post [6].
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Xintong Song
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
>> > [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
>> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Becket Qin
Hi Xintong,

Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781. Personally I
don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:

1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of the
mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes this
issue.
2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
consequence is that the job will just failover.

I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't be
thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown sequence,
which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed a bug.
>
> I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
>
> At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the release
> candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next release
> candidate.
>
> The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> >
> > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this is a
> >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492 [2].
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi everyone,
> >> >
> >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> >> 1.12.1,
> >> > as follows:
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >> >
> >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> to
> >> be
> >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> >> blog
> >> > post [6].
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Xintong Song
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> >> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> >> > [4]
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> >> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
> >>
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
@Becket,

Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant on the
jira.

Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Xintong,
>
> Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781. Personally I
> don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
>
> 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of the
> mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes this
> issue.
> 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
> consequence is that the job will just failover.
>
> I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't be
> thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown sequence,
> which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed a
> bug.
> >
> > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
> >
> > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the release
> > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next release
> > candidate.
> >
> > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> > >
> > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> -1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this is
> a
> > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492 [2].
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Matthias
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi everyone,
> > >> >
> > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > >> 1.12.1,
> > >> > as follows:
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > >> >
> > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > includes:
> > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> > to
> > >> be
> > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> announcement
> > >> blog
> > >> > post [6].
> > >> >
> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority
> > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Xintong Song
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> > >> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> > >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> > >> > [4]
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> > >> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Chesnay Schepler-3
Should we maybe wait with this release until we have the docker issue
sorted out?

On 12/28/2020 1:51 PM, Xintong Song wrote:

> @Becket,
>
> Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant on the
> jira.
>
> Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Xintong,
>>
>> Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781. Personally I
>> don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
>>
>> 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of the
>> mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes this
>> issue.
>> 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
>> consequence is that the job will just failover.
>>
>> I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't be
>> thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown sequence,
>> which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed a
>> bug.
>>> I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
>>>
>>> At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the release
>>> candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next release
>>> candidate.
>>>
>>> The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.
>>>
>>> Thank you~
>>>
>>> Xintong Song
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
>>>>
>>>> @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you~
>>>>
>>>> Xintong Song
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this is
>> a
>>>>> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492 [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>>> 1.12.1,
>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> comments)
>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> includes:
>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
>>> to
>>>>> be
>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>>>>> fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>> announcement
>>>>> blog
>>>>>> post [6].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority
>>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Xintong Song
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
>>>>>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
I think we may hold announcing this release until the 1.12.1 official image
is available.

For the other approaches discussed in FLINK-20632 (hosting Docker images
ourselves, moving most of entrypoint scripts into the Flink repository,
etc.), maybe we can address them in future releases.

Thank you~

Xintong Song


[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20632



On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 3:08 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Should we maybe wait with this release until we have the docker issue
> sorted out?
>
> On 12/28/2020 1:51 PM, Xintong Song wrote:
> > @Becket,
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant on
> the
> > jira.
> >
> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Xintong,
> >>
> >> Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
> Personally I
> >> don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
> >>
> >> 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of the
> >> mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes
> this
> >> issue.
> >> 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
> >> consequence is that the job will just failover.
> >>
> >> I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't be
> >> thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown sequence,
> >> which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed a
> >> bug.
> >>> I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
> >>>
> >>> At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the release
> >>> candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next
> release
> >>> candidate.
> >>>
> >>> The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you~
> >>>
> >>> Xintong Song
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> >>>>
> >>>> @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you~
> >>>>
> >>>> Xintong Song
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> -1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this is
> >> a
> >>>>> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492 [2].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> >>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> >>>>> 1.12.1,
> >>>>>> as follows:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >> comments)
> >>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>> includes:
> >>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> >>> to
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> >>>>>> fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> >>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> >>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >> announcement
> >>>>> blog
> >>>>>> post [6].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> >> majority
> >>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Xintong Song
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> >>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> >>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> >>>>>> [4]
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> >>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> >>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Matthias
In reply to this post by Xintong Song
I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the quickfix in
place for 1.12.1.

Thanks,
Matthias

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> @Becket,
>
> Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant on the
> jira.
>
> Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Xintong,
> >
> > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
> Personally I
> > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
> >
> > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of the
> > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes
> this
> > issue.
> > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
> > consequence is that the job will just failover.
> >
> > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't be
> > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown sequence,
> > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed a
> > bug.
> > >
> > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
> > >
> > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the release
> > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next
> release
> > > candidate.
> > >
> > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> > > >
> > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you~
> > > >
> > > > Xintong Song
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> -1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this
> is
> > a
> > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492
> [2].
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Matthias
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > > >> 1.12.1,
> > > >> > as follows:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > comments)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > includes:
> > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> releases
> > > to
> > > >> be
> > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> with
> > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> [4],
> > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > announcement
> > > >> blog
> > > >> > post [6].
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > majority
> > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Xintong Song
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1]
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> > > >> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> > > >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> > > >> > [4]
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> > > >> > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
Hi Matthias,
I think Becket's opinion is not to block this release on FLINK-20781, thus
not to cancel the vote for this rc1.
Since you have already voted -1, I'd like to understand your opinion on
this release candidate now.
Do you still believe we should not approve rc1 because of FLINK-20781, or
would you be ok to withdraw the veto based on Becket's comments?

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the quickfix in
> place for 1.12.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > @Becket,
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant on
> the
> > jira.
> >
> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Xintong,
> > >
> > > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
> > Personally I
> > > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
> > >
> > > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of
> the
> > > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes
> > this
> > > issue.
> > > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
> > > consequence is that the job will just failover.
> > >
> > > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't be
> > > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown
> sequence,
> > > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed a
> > > bug.
> > > >
> > > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
> > > >
> > > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the release
> > > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next
> > release
> > > > candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you~
> > > >
> > > > Xintong Song
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> > > > >
> > > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you~
> > > > >
> > > > > Xintong Song
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether this
> > is
> > > a
> > > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492
> > [2].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> Matthias
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> version
> > > > >> 1.12.1,
> > > > >> > as follows:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > comments)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > > includes:
> > > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > releases
> > > > to
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> > with
> > > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> > > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> > [4],
> > > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> > > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > > announcement
> > > > >> blog
> > > > >> > post [6].
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > > majority
> > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > Xintong Song
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [1]
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> > > > >> > [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> > > > >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> > > > >> > [4]
> > > > >>
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> > > > >> > [5]
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> > > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> > > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Matthias
Hi Xintong,
I'm withdrawing my veto. Becket's proposed way of fixing it sounds fine.
Sorry for not being clear enough in my previous message.

Best,
Matthias

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:11 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Matthias,
> I think Becket's opinion is not to block this release on FLINK-20781, thus
> not to cancel the vote for this rc1.
> Since you have already voted -1, I'd like to understand your opinion on
> this release candidate now.
> Do you still believe we should not approve rc1 because of FLINK-20781, or
> would you be ok to withdraw the veto based on Becket's comments?
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the quickfix in
>> place for 1.12.1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > @Becket,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant on
>> the
>> > jira.
>> >
>> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
>> >
>> > Thank you~
>> >
>> > Xintong Song
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Xintong,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
>> > Personally I
>> > > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
>> > >
>> > > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of
>> the
>> > > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes
>> > this
>> > > issue.
>> > > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
>> > > consequence is that the job will just failover.
>> > >
>> > > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't be
>> > > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown
>> sequence,
>> > > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is indeed
>> a
>> > > bug.
>> > > >
>> > > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
>> > > >
>> > > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the
>> release
>> > > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next
>> > release
>> > > > candidate.
>> > > >
>> > > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are fixed.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you~
>> > > >
>> > > > Xintong Song
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you~
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Xintong Song
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
>> > [hidden email]>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether
>> this
>> > is
>> > > a
>> > > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492
>> > [2].
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Best,
>> > > > >> Matthias
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > Hi everyone,
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>> version
>> > > > >> 1.12.1,
>> > > > >> > as follows:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> > > comments)
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> > > > includes:
>> > > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>> > releases
>> > > > to
>> > > > >> be
>> > > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
>> > with
>> > > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
>> > > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>> > [4],
>> > > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
>> > > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>> > > announcement
>> > > > >> blog
>> > > > >> > post [6].
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> > > majority
>> > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > >> > Xintong Song
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > [1]
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
>> > > > >> > [2]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
>> > > > >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> > > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
>> > > > >> > [4]
>> > > > >>
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
>> > > > >> > [5]
>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
>> > > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
>> > > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>>
>

--

Matthias Pohl | Engineer

Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>

--

Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
Conference

Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time

--

Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany

--
Ververica GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Yip Park Tung Jason, Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang, Karl Anton
Wehner
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
Thanks for the clarification, @Matthias.

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 1:21 AM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Xintong,
> I'm withdrawing my veto. Becket's proposed way of fixing it sounds fine.
> Sorry for not being clear enough in my previous message.
>
> Best,
> Matthias
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:11 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matthias,
>> I think Becket's opinion is not to block this release on FLINK-20781,
>> thus not to cancel the vote for this rc1.
>> Since you have already voted -1, I'd like to understand your opinion on
>> this release candidate now.
>> Do you still believe we should not approve rc1 because of FLINK-20781, or
>> would you be ok to withdraw the veto based on Becket's comments?
>>
>> Thank you~
>>
>> Xintong Song
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the quickfix in
>>> place for 1.12.1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > @Becket,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant on
>>> the
>>> > jira.
>>> >
>>> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
>>> >
>>> > Thank you~
>>> >
>>> > Xintong Song
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Xintong,
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
>>> > Personally I
>>> > > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
>>> > >
>>> > > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence of
>>> the
>>> > > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just exposes
>>> > this
>>> > > issue.
>>> > > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
>>> > > consequence is that the job will just failover.
>>> > >
>>> > > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't
>>> be
>>> > > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown
>>> sequence,
>>> > > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > >
>>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is
>>> indeed a
>>> > > bug.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the
>>> release
>>> > > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next
>>> > release
>>> > > > candidate.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are
>>> fixed.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thank you~
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Xintong Song
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Thank you~
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Xintong Song
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether
>>> this
>>> > is
>>> > > a
>>> > > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by FLINK-20492
>>> > [2].
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Best,
>>> > > > >> Matthias
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>>> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]
>>> >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> > Hi everyone,
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>>> version
>>> > > > >> 1.12.1,
>>> > > > >> > as follows:
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>> > > comments)
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> > > > includes:
>>> > > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>> > releases
>>> > > > to
>>> > > > >> be
>>> > > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
>>> key
>>> > with
>>> > > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
>>> > > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>> > [4],
>>> > > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
>>> > > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>> > > announcement
>>> > > > >> blog
>>> > > > >> > post [6].
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>> > > majority
>>> > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >> > Thanks,
>>> > > > >> > Xintong Song
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >> > [1]
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >> >
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
>>> > > > >> > [2]
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
>>> > > > >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> > > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
>>> > > > >> > [4]
>>> > > > >>
>>> > >
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
>>> > > > >> > [5]
>>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
>>> > > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
>>> > > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Pohl | Engineer
>
> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
>
> --
>
> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> Conference
>
> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>
> --
>
> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
>
> --
> Ververica GmbH
> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> Managing Directors: Yip Park Tung Jason, Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang, Karl Anton
> Wehner
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
+1 (non-binding)

   - Verified checksums and signatures
   - No binaries found in source archive
   - Build from source
   - Tried a couple of example jobs in various deployment mode
      - Local
      - Standalone
      - Native Kubernetes Application & Session with image built locally
      - Yarn Job & Session
   - UI and logs look good

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:40 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification, @Matthias.
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 1:21 AM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Xintong,
>> I'm withdrawing my veto. Becket's proposed way of fixing it sounds fine.
>> Sorry for not being clear enough in my previous message.
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:11 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>> I think Becket's opinion is not to block this release on FLINK-20781,
>>> thus not to cancel the vote for this rc1.
>>> Since you have already voted -1, I'd like to understand your opinion on
>>> this release candidate now.
>>> Do you still believe we should not approve rc1 because of FLINK-20781,
>>> or would you be ok to withdraw the veto based on Becket's comments?
>>>
>>> Thank you~
>>>
>>> Xintong Song
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the quickfix
>>>> in
>>>> place for 1.12.1.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > @Becket,
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant
>>>> on the
>>>> > jira.
>>>> >
>>>> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you~
>>>> >
>>>> > Xintong Song
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi Xintong,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
>>>> > Personally I
>>>> > > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence
>>>> of the
>>>> > > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just
>>>> exposes
>>>> > this
>>>> > > issue.
>>>> > > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
>>>> > > consequence is that the job will just failover.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE won't
>>>> be
>>>> > > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown
>>>> sequence,
>>>> > > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]
>>>> >
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is
>>>> indeed a
>>>> > > bug.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the
>>>> release
>>>> > > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next
>>>> > release
>>>> > > > candidate.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are
>>>> fixed.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Thank you~
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Xintong Song
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Thank you~
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Xintong Song
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
>>>> > [hidden email]>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether
>>>> this
>>>> > is
>>>> > > a
>>>> > > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by
>>>> FLINK-20492
>>>> > [2].
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Best,
>>>> > > > >> Matthias
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
>>>> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> > Hi everyone,
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>>>> version
>>>> > > > >> 1.12.1,
>>>> > > > >> > as follows:
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>> > > comments)
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> > > > includes:
>>>> > > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> > > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>> > releases
>>>> > > > to
>>>> > > > >> be
>>>> > > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
>>>> key
>>>> > with
>>>> > > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
>>>> > > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>> Repository
>>>> > [4],
>>>> > > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
>>>> > > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>> > > announcement
>>>> > > > >> blog
>>>> > > > >> > post [6].
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>> > > majority
>>>> > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > Thanks,
>>>> > > > >> > Xintong Song
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> > [1]
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >> >
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
>>>> > > > >> > [2]
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
>>>> > > > >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>> > > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
>>>> > > > >> > [4]
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
>>>> > > > >> > [5]
>>>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
>>>> > > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
>>>> > > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Matthias Pohl | Engineer
>>
>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
>> Conference
>>
>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>>
>> --
>>
>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
>>
>> --
>> Ververica GmbH
>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>> Managing Directors: Yip Park Tung Jason, Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang, Karl Anton
>> Wehner
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Robert Metzger
The Docker images for Flink 1.12.0 are still not on Docker Hub (the
official images), because they were not accepted by Docker.
To avoid such issues in the future, we've decided to additionally publish
the Docker images on GitHub as part of the release process (immediately)
[1]. We still intend to publish the official images to Docker Hub, but with
potential delays.
For Flink 1.12.1, it would be nice to update the docker image defaults to
the Github Packages hosting, so that Flink on Kubernetes works out of the
box, irrespective of potential delays due to the Docker Hub official images
review process.

I propose to cancel this RC and open a new one with the defaults updated.
I'll prepare a PR for that.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20632


On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:42 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>    - Verified checksums and signatures
>    - No binaries found in source archive
>    - Build from source
>    - Tried a couple of example jobs in various deployment mode
>       - Local
>       - Standalone
>       - Native Kubernetes Application & Session with image built locally
>       - Yarn Job & Session
>    - UI and logs look good
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:40 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the clarification, @Matthias.
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 1:21 AM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Xintong,
> >> I'm withdrawing my veto. Becket's proposed way of fixing it sounds fine.
> >> Sorry for not being clear enough in my previous message.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:11 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Matthias,
> >>> I think Becket's opinion is not to block this release on FLINK-20781,
> >>> thus not to cancel the vote for this rc1.
> >>> Since you have already voted -1, I'd like to understand your opinion on
> >>> this release candidate now.
> >>> Do you still believe we should not approve rc1 because of FLINK-20781,
> >>> or would you be ok to withdraw the veto based on Becket's comments?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you~
> >>>
> >>> Xintong Song
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the quickfix
> >>>> in
> >>>> place for 1.12.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > @Becket,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you meant
> >>>> on the
> >>>> > jira.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thank you~
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Xintong Song
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Hi Xintong,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
> >>>> > Personally I
> >>>> > > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons are:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown sequence
> >>>> of the
> >>>> > > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just
> >>>> exposes
> >>>> > this
> >>>> > > issue.
> >>>> > > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
> >>>> > > consequence is that the job will just failover.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE
> won't
> >>>> be
> >>>> > > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown
> >>>> sequence,
> >>>> > > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Thanks,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <
> [hidden email]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is
> >>>> indeed a
> >>>> > > bug.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the
> >>>> release
> >>>> > > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the next
> >>>> > release
> >>>> > > > candidate.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are
> >>>> fixed.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Thank you~
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Xintong Song
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <
> >>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release blocker?
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > Thank you~
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > Xintong Song
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
> >>>> > [hidden email]>
> >>>> > > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see whether
> >>>> this
> >>>> > is
> >>>> > > a
> >>>> > > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by
> >>>> FLINK-20492
> >>>> > [2].
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Best,
> >>>> > > > >> Matthias
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> >>>> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <
> >>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> >>>> version
> >>>> > > > >> 1.12.1,
> >>>> > > > >> > as follows:
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>> > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >>>> > > comments)
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review,
> which
> >>>> > > > includes:
> >>>> > > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>> > > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> >>>> > releases
> >>>> > > > to
> >>>> > > > >> be
> >>>> > > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
> >>>> key
> >>>> > with
> >>>> > > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> >>>> > > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> >>>> Repository
> >>>> > [4],
> >>>> > > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> >>>> > > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >>>> > > announcement
> >>>> > > > >> blog
> >>>> > > > >> > post [6].
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
> by
> >>>> > > majority
> >>>> > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >> > Thanks,
> >>>> > > > >> > Xintong Song
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >> > [1]
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> >>>> > > > >> > [2]
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> >>>> > > > >> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>> > > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> >>>> > > > >> > [4]
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > >
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> >>>> > > > >> > [5]
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> >>>> > > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> >>>> > > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Matthias Pohl | Engineer
> >>
> >> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> >> Conference
> >>
> >> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ververica GmbH
> >> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> >> Managing Directors: Yip Park Tung Jason, Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang, Karl
> Anton
> >> Wehner
> >>
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Xintong Song
Thanks for driving the docker image efforts, Robert.

+1 for canceling this RC. That should also give us the chance to fix
FLINK-20781.

I'll try to create the next release candidate as soon as the following
blockers are resolved.
* FLINK-20781: UnalignedCheckpointITCase failure caused by
NullPointerException
* FLINK-20632: Missing docker images for 1.12 release

If there's any other issues you think should be considered as a release
blocker, please let me know.

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:36 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> The Docker images for Flink 1.12.0 are still not on Docker Hub (the
> official images), because they were not accepted by Docker.
> To avoid such issues in the future, we've decided to additionally publish
> the Docker images on GitHub as part of the release process (immediately)
> [1]. We still intend to publish the official images to Docker Hub, but with
> potential delays.
> For Flink 1.12.1, it would be nice to update the docker image defaults to
> the Github Packages hosting, so that Flink on Kubernetes works out of the
> box, irrespective of potential delays due to the Docker Hub official images
> review process.
>
> I propose to cancel this RC and open a new one with the defaults updated.
> I'll prepare a PR for that.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20632
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:42 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >    - Verified checksums and signatures
> >    - No binaries found in source archive
> >    - Build from source
> >    - Tried a couple of example jobs in various deployment mode
> >       - Local
> >       - Standalone
> >       - Native Kubernetes Application & Session with image built locally
> >       - Yarn Job & Session
> >    - UI and logs look good
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:40 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the clarification, @Matthias.
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 1:21 AM Matthias Pohl <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Xintong,
> > >> I'm withdrawing my veto. Becket's proposed way of fixing it sounds
> fine.
> > >> Sorry for not being clear enough in my previous message.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Matthias
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:11 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Matthias,
> > >>> I think Becket's opinion is not to block this release on FLINK-20781,
> > >>> thus not to cancel the vote for this rc1.
> > >>> Since you have already voted -1, I'd like to understand your opinion
> on
> > >>> this release candidate now.
> > >>> Do you still believe we should not approve rc1 because of
> FLINK-20781,
> > >>> or would you be ok to withdraw the veto based on Becket's comments?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you~
> > >>>
> > >>> Xintong Song
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Matthias Pohl <
> [hidden email]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the
> quickfix
> > >>>> in
> > >>>> place for 1.12.1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Matthias
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]
> >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > @Becket,
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you
> meant
> > >>>> on the
> > >>>> > jira.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Thank you~
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Xintong Song
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Hi Xintong,
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
> > >>>> > Personally I
> > >>>> > > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons
> are:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown
> sequence
> > >>>> of the
> > >>>> > > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just
> > >>>> exposes
> > >>>> > this
> > >>>> > > issue.
> > >>>> > > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and the
> > >>>> > > consequence is that the job will just failover.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE
> > won't
> > >>>> be
> > >>>> > > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown
> > >>>> sequence,
> > >>>> > > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Thanks,
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is
> > >>>> indeed a
> > >>>> > > bug.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying the
> > >>>> release
> > >>>> > > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the
> next
> > >>>> > release
> > >>>> > > > candidate.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers are
> > >>>> fixed.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Thank you~
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Xintong Song
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <
> > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>> > > > wrote:
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release
> blocker?
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > Thank you~
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > Xintong Song
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
> > >>>> > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see
> whether
> > >>>> this
> > >>>> > is
> > >>>> > > a
> > >>>> > > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by
> > >>>> FLINK-20492
> > >>>> > [2].
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Best,
> > >>>> > > > >> Matthias
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> > >>>> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <
> > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
> the
> > >>>> version
> > >>>> > > > >> 1.12.1,
> > >>>> > > > >> > as follows:
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >>>> > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> specific
> > >>>> > > comments)
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review,
> > which
> > >>>> > > > includes:
> > >>>> > > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >>>> > > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary
> convenience
> > >>>> > releases
> > >>>> > > > to
> > >>>> > > > >> be
> > >>>> > > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with
> the
> > >>>> key
> > >>>> > with
> > >>>> > > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4 [3],
> > >>>> > > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > >>>> Repository
> > >>>> > [4],
> > >>>> > > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> > >>>> > > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > >>>> > > announcement
> > >>>> > > > >> blog
> > >>>> > > > >> > post [6].
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
> adopted
> > by
> > >>>> > > majority
> > >>>> > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > >>>> > > > >> > Xintong Song
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >> > [1]
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >> >
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> > >>>> > > > >> > [2]
> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> > >>>> > > > >> > [3]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >>>> > > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> > >>>> > > > >> > [4]
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> > >>>> > > > >> > [5]
> > >>>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> > >>>> > > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> > >>>> > > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Matthias Pohl | Engineer
> > >>
> > >> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> > >> Conference
> > >>
> > >> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Ververica GmbH
> > >> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> > >> Managing Directors: Yip Park Tung Jason, Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang, Karl
> > Anton
> > >> Wehner
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.12.1, release candidate #1

Till Rohrmann
+1 for canceling the RC to fix FLINK-20632. Thanks a lot for driving this
effort Xintong and Robert!

Cheers,
Till

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:01 PM Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for driving the docker image efforts, Robert.
>
> +1 for canceling this RC. That should also give us the chance to fix
> FLINK-20781.
>
> I'll try to create the next release candidate as soon as the following
> blockers are resolved.
> * FLINK-20781: UnalignedCheckpointITCase failure caused by
> NullPointerException
> * FLINK-20632: Missing docker images for 1.12 release
>
> If there's any other issues you think should be considered as a release
> blocker, please let me know.
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:36 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > The Docker images for Flink 1.12.0 are still not on Docker Hub (the
> > official images), because they were not accepted by Docker.
> > To avoid such issues in the future, we've decided to additionally publish
> > the Docker images on GitHub as part of the release process (immediately)
> > [1]. We still intend to publish the official images to Docker Hub, but
> with
> > potential delays.
> > For Flink 1.12.1, it would be nice to update the docker image defaults to
> > the Github Packages hosting, so that Flink on Kubernetes works out of the
> > box, irrespective of potential delays due to the Docker Hub official
> images
> > review process.
> >
> > I propose to cancel this RC and open a new one with the defaults updated.
> > I'll prepare a PR for that.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20632
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:42 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >    - Verified checksums and signatures
> > >    - No binaries found in source archive
> > >    - Build from source
> > >    - Tried a couple of example jobs in various deployment mode
> > >       - Local
> > >       - Standalone
> > >       - Native Kubernetes Application & Session with image built
> locally
> > >       - Yarn Job & Session
> > >    - UI and logs look good
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:40 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the clarification, @Matthias.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you~
> > > >
> > > > Xintong Song
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 1:21 AM Matthias Pohl <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Xintong,
> > > >> I'm withdrawing my veto. Becket's proposed way of fixing it sounds
> > fine.
> > > >> Sorry for not being clear enough in my previous message.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Matthias
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:11 AM Xintong Song <[hidden email]
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Matthias,
> > > >>> I think Becket's opinion is not to block this release on
> FLINK-20781,
> > > >>> thus not to cancel the vote for this rc1.
> > > >>> Since you have already voted -1, I'd like to understand your
> opinion
> > on
> > > >>> this release candidate now.
> > > >>> Do you still believe we should not approve rc1 because of
> > FLINK-20781,
> > > >>> or would you be ok to withdraw the veto based on Becket's comments?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you~
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Xintong Song
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Matthias Pohl <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I think Becket's proposal in [1] sounds reasonable having the
> > quickfix
> > > >>>> in
> > > >>>> place for 1.12.1.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Matthias
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:51 PM Xintong Song <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> > @Becket,
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I misunderstood what you
> > meant
> > > >>>> on the
> > > >>>> > jira.
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > Seems it's not necessary to cancel this vote. WDYT, @Matthias?
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > Thank you~
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > Xintong Song
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:42 PM Becket Qin <
> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > > Hi Xintong,
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> > > Thanks for driving the release. I just replied to FLINK-20781.
> > > >>>> > Personally I
> > > >>>> > > don't think that is a blocker for release-1.12.1. The reasons
> > are:
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> > > 1. The root cause of the issue is thread unsafe shutdown
> > sequence
> > > >>>> of the
> > > >>>> > > mailbox task. It is an issue for a while, SourceOperator just
> > > >>>> exposes
> > > >>>> > this
> > > >>>> > > issue.
> > > >>>> > > 2. The issue only occurs occasionally when a task exits, and
> the
> > > >>>> > > consequence is that the job will just failover.
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> > > I am happy to put a band-aid on the SourceOperator so the NPE
> > > won't
> > > >>>> be
> > > >>>> > > thrown. But a correct fix would be fixing the mailbox shutdown
> > > >>>> sequence,
> > > >>>> > > which does not seem a blocker for release-1.12.1.
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> > > Thanks,
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:37 PM Xintong Song <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>> > > wrote:
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> > > > @Becket has confirmed on the jira ticket that FLINK-20781 is
> > > >>>> indeed a
> > > >>>> > > bug.
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > > I‘m hereby officially canceling this vote.
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > > At the same time, it is appreciated to continue verifying
> the
> > > >>>> release
> > > >>>> > > > candidate and reporting issues, so they can be fixed by the
> > next
> > > >>>> > release
> > > >>>> > > > candidate.
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > > The RC#2 will be created as soon as the reported blockers
> are
> > > >>>> fixed.
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > > Thank you~
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > > Xintong Song
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM Xintong Song <
> > > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>> > > > wrote:
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > > > > Thanks for reporting the issue, @Matthias.
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > > > @Becket, could you check if this should be a release
> > blocker?
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > > > Thank you~
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > > > Xintong Song
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:24 PM Matthias Pohl <
> > > >>>> > [hidden email]>
> > > >>>> > > > > wrote:
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > > > >> Could someone have a look into FLINK-20781 [1] to see
> > whether
> > > >>>> this
> > > >>>> > is
> > > >>>> > > a
> > > >>>> > > > >> problem for 1.12.1? It seems that it's introduced by
> > > >>>> FLINK-20492
> > > >>>> > [2].
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > > > >> Best,
> > > >>>> > > > >> Matthias
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20781
> > > >>>> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20492
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 1:53 AM Xintong Song <
> > > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>> > > wrote:
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
> > the
> > > >>>> version
> > > >>>> > > > >> 1.12.1,
> > > >>>> > > > >> > as follows:
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > specific
> > > >>>> > > comments)
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> > The complete staging area is available for your review,
> > > which
> > > >>>> > > > includes:
> > > >>>> > > > >> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >>>> > > > >> > * the official Apache source release and binary
> > convenience
> > > >>>> > releases
> > > >>>> > > > to
> > > >>>> > > > >> be
> > > >>>> > > > >> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with
> > the
> > > >>>> key
> > > >>>> > with
> > > >>>> > > > >> > fingerprint F8E419AA0B60C28879E876859DFF40967ABFC5A4
> [3],
> > > >>>> > > > >> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > >>>> Repository
> > > >>>> > [4],
> > > >>>> > > > >> > * source code tag "release-1.12.1-rc1" [5],
> > > >>>> > > > >> > * website pull request listing the new release and
> adding
> > > >>>> > > announcement
> > > >>>> > > > >> blog
> > > >>>> > > > >> > post [6].
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
> > adopted
> > > by
> > > >>>> > > majority
> > > >>>> > > > >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >>>> > > > >> > Xintong Song
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [1]
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> >
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>> >
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12349459
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [2]
> > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.12.1-rc1
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [3]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > >>>> > > > >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [4]
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>>
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1410
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [5]
> > > >>>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.12.1-rc1
> > > >>>> > > > >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/405
> > > >>>> > > > >> > <https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/399>
> > > >>>> > > > >>
> > > >>>> > > > >
> > > >>>> > > >
> > > >>>> > >
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Matthias Pohl | Engineer
> > > >>
> > > >> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> > > >> Conference
> > > >>
> > > >> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Ververica GmbH
> > > >> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> > > >> Managing Directors: Yip Park Tung Jason, Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang, Karl
> > > Anton
> > > >> Wehner
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>