(DEPRECATED) Apache Flink Mailing List archive.

[VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

Classic

List

Threaded

20 messages Options

Ufuk Celebi-2

[VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

Hey all,

there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
proposal and can be found here: [1].

The proposal is as follows:
* Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
* Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
* Update the release documentation to describe how to update
apache/flink-docker for new releases

Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the proposal
[ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)

The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on: January
30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.

Cheers,

Ufuk

PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned in
the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a different
category.

[1]
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026

Konstantin Knauf-3

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> proposal and can be found here: [1].
>
> The proposal is as follows:
> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> apache/flink-docker for new releases
>
> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on: January
> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ufuk
>
> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned in
> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a different
> category.
>
> [1]
>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>

--

Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect

+49 160 91394525

Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>

--

Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
Conference

Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time

--

Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany

--
Ververica GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
(Tony) Cheng

Till Rohrmann

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (binding)

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:17 PM Konstantin Knauf <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> >
> > The proposal is as follows:
> > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> >
> > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> January
> > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ufuk
> >
> > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned
> in
> > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> different
> > category.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > [2]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect
>
> +49 160 91394525
>
>
> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
>
>
> --
>
> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> Conference
>
> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>
> --
>
> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
>
> --
> Ververica GmbH
> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
> (Tony) Cheng
>

Patrick Lucas-2

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

In reply to this post by Ufuk Celebi-2

Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.

+1 (non-binding)

--
Patrick

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> proposal and can be found here: [1].
>
> The proposal is as follows:
> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> apache/flink-docker for new releases
>
> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on: January
> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ufuk
>
> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned in
> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a different
> category.
>
> [1]
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>

Stephan Ewen

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> --
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> >
> > The proposal is as follows:
> > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> >
> > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> January
> > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ufuk
> >
> > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned
> in
> > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> different
> > category.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > [2]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >
>

Yun Tang

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)
________________________________
From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <[hidden email]> wrote:

Fabian Hueske

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1

Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <[hidden email]>:

> +1 (non-binding)
> ________________________________
> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> [hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink
> release process
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > --
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > >
> > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> apache/flink-docker
> > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > >
> > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> > January
> > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Ufuk
> > >
> > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned
> > in
> > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > different
> > > category.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > >
> >
>

Ismaël Mejía

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
docker image in this case?

Best,
Ismaël

ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <[hidden email]>:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > ________________________________
> > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > [hidden email]>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink
> > release process
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project.
> The
> > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > >
> > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > apache/flink-docker
> > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > >
> > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> > > January
> > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Ufuk
> > > >
> > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> mentioned
> > > in
> > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > > different
> > > > category.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Rong Rong

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1

--
Rong

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> docker image in this case?
>
> Best,
> Ismaël
>
> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <[hidden email]>:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink
> > > release process
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project.
> > The
> > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for
> the
> > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > comments)
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> > > > January
> > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Ufuk
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > mentioned
> > > > in
> > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > > > different
> > > > > category.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Yang Wang

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
Yang

Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：

> +1
>
> --
> Rong
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
> > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> > docker image in this case?
> >
> > Best,
> > Ismaël
> >
> > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <[hidden email]
> >:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into
> Flink
> > > > release process
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <[hidden email]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Patrick
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> project.
> > > The
> > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for
> > the
> > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > > comments)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest
> on:
> > > > > January
> > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > > mentioned
> > > > > in
> > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > > > > different
> > > > > > category.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Peter Huang

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Yang
>
> Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Rong
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
> > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> > > docker image in this case?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Ismaël
> > >
> > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> [hidden email]
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into
> > Flink
> > > > > release process
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts
> of
> > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> > project.
> > > > The
> > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning
> for
> > > the
> > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > > > comments)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest
> > on:
> > > > > > January
> > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > > > mentioned
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider
> this a
> > > > > > different
> > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Hequn Cheng

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1

Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
repo,
but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.

Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Yang
> >
> > Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rong
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was
> mostly
> > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> official
> > > > docker image in this case?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Ismaël
> > > >
> > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into
> > > Flink
> > > > > > release process
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts
> > of
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> > > project.
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> earliest
> > > on:
> > > > > > > January
> > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider
> > this a
> > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Fabian Hueske-2

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

Hi Ismael,

> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
docker image in this case?

Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub images
for every Flink release.
Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.

Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF Infra
under the Apache DockerHub user [1].

Best,
Fabian

[1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache

Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <[hidden email]
>:

> +1
>
> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
> repo,
> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
>
> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yang
> > >
> > > Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rong
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was
> > mostly
> > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > official
> > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Ismaël
> > > > >
> > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> target.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication
> into
> > > > Flink
> > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> scripts
> > > of
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> > > > project.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> reasoning
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> update
> > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> specific
> > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> > earliest
> > > > on:
> > > > > > > > January
> > > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan"
> as
> > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider
> > > this a
> > > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Arvid Heise-3

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Ismael,
>
> > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> docker image in this case?
>
> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub images
> for every Flink release.
> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
>
> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF Infra
> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
>
> Best,
> Fabian
>
> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
>
> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> [hidden email]
> >:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
> > repo,
> > but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <[hidden email]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Yang
> > > >
> > > > Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Rong
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was
> > > mostly
> > > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > official
> > > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Ismaël
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > target.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication
> > into
> > > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> > scripts
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
> Flink
> > > > > project.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> > reasoning
> > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> > update
> > > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> > specific
> > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> > > earliest
> > > > > on:
> > > > > > > > > January
> > > > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release
> Plan"
> > as
> > > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you
> consider
> > > > this a
> > > > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Yu Li

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

Best Regards,
Yu

On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael,
> >
> > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> > docker image in this case?
> >
> > Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub images
> > for every Flink release.
> > Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> >
> > Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
> Infra
> > under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> >
> > Best,
> > Fabian
> >
> > [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> >
> > Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > [hidden email]
> > >:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
> > > repo,
> > > but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Yang
> > > > >
> > > > > Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Rong
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> was
> > > > mostly
> > > > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > > official
> > > > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Ismaël
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > > target.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
> publication
> > > into
> > > > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> > > scripts
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
> > Flink
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> > > reasoning
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> > > update
> > > > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> > > specific
> > > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> > > > earliest
> > > > > > on:
> > > > > > > > > > January
> > > > > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release
> > Plan"
> > > as
> > > > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you
> > consider
> > > > > this a
> > > > > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Igal Shilman

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ismael,
> > >
> > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> official
> > > docker image in this case?
> > >
> > > Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> images
> > > for every Flink release.
> > > Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > > apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> > >
> > > Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
> > Infra
> > > under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Fabian
> > >
> > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> > >
> > > Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> main
> > > > repo,
> > > > but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Yang
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Rong
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> > was
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > > > official
> > > > > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Ismaël
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > > > target.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > > > > To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
> > publication
> > > > into
> > > > > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> > > > scripts
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
> > > Flink
> > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> > > > reasoning
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> > > > update
> > > > > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> > > > > earliest
> > > > > > > on:
> > > > > > > > > > > January
> > > > > > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release
> > > Plan"
> > > > as
> > > > > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you
> > > consider
> > > > > > this a
> > > > > > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

aihua li

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

> 2020年1月30日下午7:36，Igal Shilman <[hidden email]> 写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ismael,
>>>>
>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
>> official
>>>> docker image in this case?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
>> images
>>>> for every Flink release.
>>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
>>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
>>>>
>>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
>>> Infra
>>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Fabian
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
>>>>
>>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
>> main
>>>>> repo,
>>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Yang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Rong
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
>>> was
>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
>>>>>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
>>>>>> official
>>>>>>>>> docker image in this case?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Ismaël
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
>>>>> target.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
>>> publication
>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>>>>> release process
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
>>>>> scripts
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
>>>>> reasoning
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal and can be found here: [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
>>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Update the release documentation to describe how to
>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker for new releases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
>>>>>> earliest
>>>>>>>> on:
>>>>>>>>>>>> January
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ufuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release
>>>> Plan"
>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you
>>>> consider
>>>>>>> this a
>>>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>>>>> category.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Jingsong Li

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (non-binding)

Official docker support really looks good to me.

Best,
Jingsong Lee

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:55 AM aihua li <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > 2020年1月30日下午7:36，Igal Shilman <[hidden email]> 写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Ismael,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> >> official
> >>>> docker image in this case?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> >> images
> >>>> for every Flink release.
> >>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> >>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> >>>>
> >>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
> >>> Infra
> >>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Fabian
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> >>>>
> >>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> >>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>> :
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> >> main
> >>>>> repo,
> >>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Yang
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Rong
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> >> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> >>> was
> >>>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> >>>>>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> >>>>>> official
> >>>>>>>>> docker image in this case?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>> Ismaël
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> >>>>> target.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> >>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> >>>>>>>>>>> To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
> >>> publication
> >>>>> into
> >>>>>>>> Flink
> >>>>>>>>>>> release process
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
> >>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> >>>>> scripts
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
> >>>> Flink
> >>>>>>>> project.
> >>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> >>>>> reasoning
> >>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal and can be found here: [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is as follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> >>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> >>>>> update
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker for new releases
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> >>>>> specific
> >>>>>>>>>> comments)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> >>>>>> earliest
> >>>>>>>> on:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> January
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ufuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release
> >>>> Plan"
> >>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> mentioned
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you
> >>>> consider
> >>>>>>> this a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> different
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> category.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

--
Best, Jingsong Lee

Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

+1 (binding)

Cheers,
Gordon

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:16 PM Jingsong Li <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Official docker support really looks good to me.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:55 AM aihua li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > > 2020年1月30日下午7:36，Igal Shilman <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Yu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Ismael,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > >> official
> > >>>> docker image in this case?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> > >> images
> > >>>> for every Flink release.
> > >>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > >>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via
> ASF
> > >>> Infra
> > >>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Fabian
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > >>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>> :
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> > >> main
> > >>>>> repo,
> > >>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> > >>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>> Yang
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Rong
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> > >> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> > >>> was
> > >>>>>> mostly
> > >>>>>>>>> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > >>>>>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > >>>>>> official
> > >>>>>>>>> docker image in this case?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Ismaël
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > >>>>> target.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > >>>>>>>>>>> To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
> > >>> publication
> > >>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>>>>> release process
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
> > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> > >>>>> scripts
> > >>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
> > >>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>> project.
> > >>>>>>>>>> The
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> > >>>>> reasoning
> > >>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is as follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> > >>>>> update
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> > >>>>> specific
> > >>>>>>>>>> comments)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> > >>>>>> earliest
> > >>>>>>>> on:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> January
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ufuk
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release
> > >>>> Plan"
> > >>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>> mentioned
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you
> > >>>> consider
> > >>>>>>> this a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> different
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> category.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best, Jingsong Lee
>

Ufuk Celebi-2

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

Thanks a lot for your voting. The voting period has passed and we have a
sufficient number of votes.

I’ll summarize the result in a separate email.

Cheers,

Ufuk

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Gordon
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:16 PM Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Official docker support really looks good to me.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jingsong Lee
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:55 AM aihua li <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > > 2020年1月30日下午7:36，Igal Shilman <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Best Regards,
> > > >> Yu
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Ismael,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > >> official
> > > >>>> docker image in this case?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> > > >> images
> > > >>>> for every Flink release.
> > > >>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > > >>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via
> > ASF
> > > >>> Infra
> > > >>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Fabian
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > > >>>> [hidden email]
> > > >>>>> :
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> > > >> main
> > > >>>>> repo,
> > > >>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> > > >>> [hidden email]
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <
> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>> Yang
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Rong Rong <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月30日周四上午12:53写道：
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>> Rong
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> > > >> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> > > >>> was
> > > >>>>>> mostly
> > > >>>>>>>>> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > >>>>>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > >>>>>> official
> > > >>>>>>>>> docker image in this case?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Ismaël
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > > >>>>> target.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> > > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > > >>>>>>>>> :
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> To: dev <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
> > > >>> publication
> > > >>>>> into
> > > >>>>>>>> Flink
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> release process
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
> > > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> > > >>>>> scripts
> > > >>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
> > > >>>> Flink
> > > >>>>>>>> project.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> The
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> > > >>>>> reasoning
> > > >>>>>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is as follows:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> > > >>>>> update
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> > > >>>>> specific
> > > >>>>>>>>>> comments)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> > > >>>>>> earliest
> > > >>>>>>>> on:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> January
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ufuk
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release
> > > >>>> Plan"
> > > >>>>> as
> > > >>>>>>>>>> mentioned
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you
> > > >>>> consider
> > > >>>>>>> this a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> different
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> category.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Best, Jingsong Lee
> >
>