[VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Piotr Nowojski-3
Hi,

I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink as discussed in the discussion thread [1].

This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00 UTC.

Piotrek

[1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html <http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Benchao Li
Hi Piotr,

It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog


Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
> as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
>
> This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00 UTC.
>
> Piotrek
>
> [1]
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> <
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> >



--

Benchao Li
School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
Tel:+86-15650713730
Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Jingsong Li
+1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
FLIP page.

Best,
Jingsong Lee

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Piotr,
>
> It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
> see:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
>
>
> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
> Flink
> > as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
> >
> > This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00 UTC.
> >
> > Piotrek
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > <
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Benchao Li
> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
> Tel:+86-15650713730
> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>


--
Best, Jingsong Lee
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999)
+1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is meaningful in some scenarios.

best,
Zhijiang


------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
To:dev <[hidden email]>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

+1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
FLIP page.

Best,
Jingsong Lee

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Piotr,
>
> It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
> see:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
>
>
> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
> Flink
> > as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
> >
> > This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00 UTC.
> >
> > Piotrek
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > <
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Benchao Li
> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
> Tel:+86-15650713730
> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>


--
Best, Jingsong Lee

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Arvid Heise-3
non-binding +1

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
> meaningful in some scenarios.
>
> best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
> To:dev <[hidden email]>
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>
> +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
> Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
> FLIP page.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
> > see:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
> >
> >
> > Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
> > Flink
> > > as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
> > >
> > > This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
> UTC.
> > >
> > > Piotrek
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Benchao Li
> > School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
> > Tel:+86-15650713730
> > Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
> >
>
>
> --
> Best, Jingsong Lee
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Yun Gao
+1 (non-binding).

Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to bring improvements in the discussed scenarios.

Best,
Yun


------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48
To:dev <[hidden email]>; Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

non-binding +1

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
> meaningful in some scenarios.
>
> best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
> To:dev <[hidden email]>
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>
> +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
> Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
> FLIP page.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
> > see:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
> >
> >
> > Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
> > Flink
> > > as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
> > >
> > > This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
> UTC.
> > >
> > > Piotrek
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Benchao Li
> > School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
> > Tel:+86-15650713730
> > Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
> >
>
>
> --
> Best, Jingsong Lee
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Piotr Nowojski-3
In reply to this post by Benchao Li
Hi,

I was checking the official list of FLIP’s [1] and just took the “Next FLIP Number: 93” (which was 92 at that time), that’s why I didn’t notice your mailing list thread from the same day.

Please next time first claim the number there and update the wiki. First edit [1] by reserving the number and bumping the next free one and only after that starting the mailing list thread. Otherwise there can be race conditions like this :/

Piotrek

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals>

> On 10 Jan 2020, at 01:40, Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
> It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
> see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
>
>
> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>> as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
>>
>> This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00 UTC.
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> [1]
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>> <
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Benchao Li
> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
> Tel:+86-15650713730
> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Haibo Sun
In reply to this post by Yun Gao
+1 (non-binding)


Best,
Haibo

At 2020-01-13 11:36:12, "Yun Gao" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>+1 (non-binding).
>
>Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to bring improvements in the discussed scenarios.
>
>Best,
>Yun
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>From:Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
>Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48
>To:dev <[hidden email]>; Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
>Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>
>non-binding +1
>
>On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
>wrote:
>
>> +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
>> meaningful in some scenarios.
>>
>> best,
>> Zhijiang
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
>> To:dev <[hidden email]>
>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>>
>> +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
>> Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
>> FLIP page.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jingsong Lee
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Piotr,
>> >
>> > It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
>> > see:
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
>> >
>> >
>> > Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
>> > Flink
>> > > as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
>> > >
>> > > This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
>> UTC.
>> > >
>> > > Piotrek
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> >
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>> > > <
>> > >
>> >
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>> > > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Benchao Li
>> > School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
>> > Tel:+86-15650713730
>> > Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Zhenghua Gao
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for driving this. It's an important improvement in
the discussed scenarios.

*Best Regards,*
*Zhenghua Gao*


On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:13 PM Haibo Sun <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Haibo
>
> At 2020-01-13 11:36:12, "Yun Gao" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >+1 (non-binding).
> >
> >Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to
> bring improvements in the discussed scenarios.
> >
> >Best,
> >Yun
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >From:Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
> >Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48
> >To:dev <[hidden email]>; Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
> >Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
> >
> >non-binding +1
> >
> >On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[hidden email]
> .invalid>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
> >> meaningful in some scenarios.
> >>
> >> best,
> >> Zhijiang
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
> >> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
> >> To:dev <[hidden email]>
> >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
> >>
> >> +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
> >> Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
> >> FLIP page.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jingsong Lee
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Piotr,
> >> >
> >> > It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
> >> > see:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
> >> > Flink
> >> > > as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
> >> > >
> >> > > This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
> >> UTC.
> >> > >
> >> > > Piotrek
> >> > >
> >> > > [1]
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> >> > > <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Benchao Li
> >> > School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
> University
> >> > Tel:+86-15650713730
> >> > Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best, Jingsong Lee
> >>
> >>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Nico Kruber-3
+1 (binding)

Aside the mentioned use cases in SQL/Batch, I also see advantages in
streaming where joining multiple streams together seems to be quite
common, too. For that, however, we would need the addition in the
DataStream API... but agreed it could be done in a second step


Nico

On 14/01/2020 02:44, Zhenghua Gao wrote:

> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for driving this. It's an important improvement in
> the discussed scenarios.
>
> *Best Regards,*
> *Zhenghua Gao*
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:13 PM Haibo Sun <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Haibo
>>
>> At 2020-01-13 11:36:12, "Yun Gao" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>
>>> Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to
>> bring improvements in the discussed scenarios.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yun
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> From:Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
>>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48
>>> To:dev <[hidden email]>; Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>>>
>>> non-binding +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[hidden email]
>> .invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
>>>> meaningful in some scenarios.
>>>>
>>>> best,
>>>> Zhijiang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
>>>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]>
>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>>>>
>>>> +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
>>>> Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
>>>> FLIP page.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jingsong Lee
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
>>>>> see:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
>>>>> Flink
>>>>>> as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
>>>> UTC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotrek
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
>> University
>>>>> Tel:+86-15650713730
>>>>> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
--
Nico Kruber | Solutions Architect

Follow us @VervericaData Ververica
--
Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
--
Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
--
Ververica GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
(Tony) Cheng


signature.asc (201 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Piotr Nowojski-3
Thank you all for the votes.

So far we have received 7 approving votes, 2 of which are binding and there is no -1 votes:
* Nico (binding)
* Zhijiang (binding)
* Zhenghua (non-binding)
* Yun (non-binding)
* Haibo (non-binding)
* Jingsong (non-binding)
* Arvid (non-binding)

Therefore, I'm happy to announce that FLIP-92 has been accepted.

I have also created a Jira ticket to track the work [1]

Thanks everyone!
Piotrek

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15688 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15688>

> On 20 Jan 2020, at 14:42, Nico Kruber <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Aside the mentioned use cases in SQL/Batch, I also see advantages in
> streaming where joining multiple streams together seems to be quite
> common, too. For that, however, we would need the addition in the
> DataStream API... but agreed it could be done in a second step
>
>
> Nico
>
> On 14/01/2020 02:44, Zhenghua Gao wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for driving this. It's an important improvement in
>> the discussed scenarios.
>>
>> *Best Regards,*
>> *Zhenghua Gao*
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:13 PM Haibo Sun <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Haibo
>>>
>>> At 2020-01-13 11:36:12, "Yun Gao" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>
>>>> Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to
>>> bring improvements in the discussed scenarios.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Yun
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> From:Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
>>>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48
>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]>; Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>>>>
>>>> non-binding +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[hidden email]
>>> .invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
>>>>> meaningful in some scenarios.
>>>>>
>>>>> best,
>>>>> Zhijiang
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
>>>>> Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
>>>>> FLIP page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jingsong Lee
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
>>>>>> see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
>>>>>> Flink
>>>>>>> as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
>>>>> UTC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Piotrek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
>>> University
>>>>>> Tel:+86-15650713730
>>>>>> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Nico Kruber | Solutions Architect
>
> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica
> --
> Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> --
> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> --
> Ververica GmbH
> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
> (Tony) Cheng
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink

Aljoscha Krettek-2
+1

I approve this FLIP.

Best,
Aljoscha

On 20.01.20 15:24, Piotr Nowojski wrote:

> Thank you all for the votes.
>
> So far we have received 7 approving votes, 2 of which are binding and there is no -1 votes:
> * Nico (binding)
> * Zhijiang (binding)
> * Zhenghua (non-binding)
> * Yun (non-binding)
> * Haibo (non-binding)
> * Jingsong (non-binding)
> * Arvid (non-binding)
>
> Therefore, I'm happy to announce that FLIP-92 has been accepted.
>
> I have also created a Jira ticket to track the work [1]
>
> Thanks everyone!
> Piotrek
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15688 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15688>
>
>> On 20 Jan 2020, at 14:42, Nico Kruber <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Aside the mentioned use cases in SQL/Batch, I also see advantages in
>> streaming where joining multiple streams together seems to be quite
>> common, too. For that, however, we would need the addition in the
>> DataStream API... but agreed it could be done in a second step
>>
>>
>> Nico
>>
>> On 14/01/2020 02:44, Zhenghua Gao wrote:
>>> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for driving this. It's an important improvement in
>>> the discussed scenarios.
>>>
>>> *Best Regards,*
>>> *Zhenghua Gao*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:13 PM Haibo Sun <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Haibo
>>>>
>>>> At 2020-01-13 11:36:12, "Yun Gao" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>
>>>>> Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to
>>>> bring improvements in the discussed scenarios.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Yun
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> From:Arvid Heise <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48
>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]>; Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>>>>>
>>>>> non-binding +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[hidden email]
>>>> .invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
>>>>>> meaningful in some scenarios.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best,
>>>>>> Zhijiang
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> From:Jingsong Li <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
>>>>>> To:dev <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
>>>>>> Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
>>>>>> FLIP page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Jingsong Lee
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
>>>>>>> see:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
>>>>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>> as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
>>>>>> UTC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Piotrek
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
>>>> University
>>>>>>> Tel:+86-15650713730
>>>>>>> Email: [hidden email]; [hidden email]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Nico Kruber | Solutions Architect
>>
>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica
>> --
>> Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>> --
>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
>> --
>> Ververica GmbH
>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
>> (Tony) Cheng
>>
>
>