+1 from my side and thanks for driving this.
*Best Regards,*
*Zhenghua Gao*
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:10 AM Forward Xu <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Danny,
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best,
> Forward
>
> Danny Chan <
[hidden email]> 于2020年1月10日周五 上午11:08写道：
>
> > Thanks Forward ~
> > +1 from my side and would review your Calcite PR this weekend :) Overall
> > it looks good, and I believe we can merge it soon ~
> >
> > Best,
> > Danny Chan
> > 在 2020年1月10日 +0800 AM11:04，Jark Wu <
[hidden email]>，写道：
> > > Thanks Forward for driving this,
> > >
> > > The design doc looks very good to me.
> > > +1 from my side.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jark
> > >
> > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 20:12, Forward Xu <
[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Listened to the opinion of Timo since the last discussion and updated
> > the
> > > > document [1] Optimized the passing parameters of JSON table API.
> Added
> > > > return type when describing each JSON function. It makes the
> > documentation
> > > > more clear. So I again vote of FLIP-90 [2] since that we have reached
> > an
> > > > agreement on the design in the discussion thread [3].
> > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there is an
> > objection,
> > > > I will try to close it by January 12, 2020 08:00 UTC if we have
> > received
> > > > sufficient votes.
> > > > Best,
> > > > ForwardXu
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JfaFYIFOAY8P2pFhOYNCQ9RTzwF4l85_bnTvImOLKMk/edit#heading=h.76mb88ca6yjp> > > > [2]
> > > >
> >
>
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=141724550> > > > [3]
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Support-JSON-functions-in-Flink-SQL-td32674.html> > > >
> >
>
Locked
