[VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

[Jark Wu-2]

Hi all,

I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and
reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after
Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.

Thanks,
Jark

[1]:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
[2]:
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html

[Kurt Young]

+1

Best,
Kurt


On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and
> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after
> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jark
>
> [1]:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
> [2]:
>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html
>

[Danny Chan]

+1, thanks for the effort, Jack !

Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年9月26日 +0800 AM11:52，Jark Wu <[hidden email]>，写道：

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and
> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after
> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jark
>
> [1]:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
> [2]:
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html

[JingsongLee-2]

+1 non-binding
(nit: Add a road map?)

Best,
Jingsong Lee


------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Kurt Young <[hidden email]>
Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44
To:dev <[hidden email]>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)

+1

Best,
Kurt


On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and
> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after
> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jark
>
> [1]:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
> [2]:
>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html
>

[Rong Rong]

+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions @Jark

--
Rong

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 non-binding
> (nit: Add a road map?)
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Kurt Young <[hidden email]>
> Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44
> To:dev <[hidden email]>
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)
>
> +1
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and
> > reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after
> > Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jark
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
> > [2]:
> >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html
> >
>

[Timo Walther-2]

+1 for the syntax and their semantics

I think the implementation part is still a bit unclear to me because it
only ensures the current status but still does not solve future
requirements such as per-partition watermarks that need to be pushed
into a connector such as Kafka. We can also discuss that as part of the
computed column FLIP.

@Rong: Why do you think you vote is not binding? Committer votes are
binding :-)

Thanks,
Timo

On 29.09.19 02:17, Rong Rong wrote:

> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions @Jark
>
> --
> Rong
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 non-binding
>> (nit: Add a road map?)
>>
>> Best,
>> Jingsong Lee
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> From:Kurt Young <[hidden email]>
>> Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44
>> To:dev <[hidden email]>
>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Best,
>> Kurt
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and
>>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after
>>> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jark
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
>>> [2]:
>>>
>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html

[Rong Rong]

Oops.. Sorry for the confusion. I thought only PMC votes are binding.
Thanks for the clarification @Timo :-D

--
Rong

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:12 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 for the syntax and their semantics
>
> I think the implementation part is still a bit unclear to me because it
> only ensures the current status but still does not solve future
> requirements such as per-partition watermarks that need to be pushed
> into a connector such as Kafka. We can also discuss that as part of the
> computed column FLIP.
>
> @Rong: Why do you think you vote is not binding? Committer votes are
> binding :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Timo
>
> On 29.09.19 02:17, Rong Rong wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions @Jark
> >
> > --
> > Rong
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <[hidden email]
> .invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 non-binding
> >> (nit: Add a road map?)
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jingsong Lee
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> From:Kurt Young <[hidden email]>
> >> Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44
> >> To:dev <[hidden email]>
> >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Kurt
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and
> >>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after
> >>> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jark
> >>>
> >>> [1]:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
> >>> [2]:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html
>
>
>

[Jark Wu-2]

+1 from my side.

Best,
Jark


On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 09:33, Rong Rong <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Oops.. Sorry for the confusion. I thought only PMC votes are binding.
> Thanks for the clarification @Timo :-D
>
> --
> Rong
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:12 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the syntax and their semantics
> >
> > I think the implementation part is still a bit unclear to me because it
> > only ensures the current status but still does not solve future
> > requirements such as per-partition watermarks that need to be pushed
> > into a connector such as Kafka. We can also discuss that as part of the
> > computed column FLIP.
> >
> > @Rong: Why do you think you vote is not binding? Committer votes are
> > binding :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Timo
> >
> > On 29.09.19 02:17, Rong Rong wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions
> @Jark
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rong
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <[hidden email]
> > .invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 non-binding
> > >> (nit: Add a road map?)
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Jingsong Lee
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> From:Kurt Young <[hidden email]>
> > >> Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44
> > >> To:dev <[hidden email]>
> > >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Kurt
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed
> and
> > >>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it
> after
> > >>> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Jark
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
> > >>> [2]:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html
> >
> >
> >
>

[Jark Wu-2]

Thanks all for the voting. I'm closing the vote now.
So far, the vote received:

* +1 votes (4 binding, 2 non-binding):
 - Kurt Young (binding)
 - Danny Chan
 - Jingsong Lee
 - Rong Rong (binding)
 - Timo (binding)
 - Jark (binding)

* 0/-1 votes: none

Thereby, the community accepted FLIP-66. I'll update the FLIP wiki page
accordingly and create JIRA issues.

Hi Timo,
I agree the per-partition watermarks is an important feature that many
users require,
let's discuss it in computed column FLIP. This is also very relevant to the
design of computed column.

Cheers,
Jark

On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 11:02, Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 from my side.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 09:33, Rong Rong <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Oops.. Sorry for the confusion. I thought only PMC votes are binding.
>> Thanks for the clarification @Timo :-D
>>
>> --
>> Rong
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:12 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for the syntax and their semantics
>> >
>> > I think the implementation part is still a bit unclear to me because it
>> > only ensures the current status but still does not solve future
>> > requirements such as per-partition watermarks that need to be pushed
>> > into a connector such as Kafka. We can also discuss that as part of the
>> > computed column FLIP.
>> >
>> > @Rong: Why do you think you vote is not binding? Committer votes are
>> > binding :-)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Timo
>> >
>> > On 29.09.19 02:17, Rong Rong wrote:
>> > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions
>> @Jark
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Rong
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <[hidden email]
>> > .invalid>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +1 non-binding
>> > >> (nit: Add a road map?)
>> > >>
>> > >> Best,
>> > >> Jingsong Lee
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> From:Kurt Young <[hidden email]>
>> > >> Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44
>> > >> To:dev <[hidden email]>
>> > >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2)
>> > >>
>> > >> +1
>> > >>
>> > >> Best,
>> > >> Kurt
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi all,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed
>> and
>> > >>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it
>> after
>> > >>> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks,
>> > >>> Jark
>> > >>>
>> > >>> [1]:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL
>> > >>> [2]:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>