(DEPRECATED) Apache Flink Mailing List archive.

[VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

Classic

List

Threaded

9 messages Options

Timo Walther-2

[VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

Hi everyone,

I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to have
reached an agreement.

Please vote for the following design document:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+inference+for+Table+API+UDFs

The discussion can be found at:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E

This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it on
2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.

Best,

Timo

Aljoscha Krettek-2

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

+1 (binding)

Aljoscha

> On 21. Oct 2019, at 10:50, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to have
> reached an agreement.
>
> Please vote for the following design document:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+inference+for+Table+API+UDFs
>
>
> The discussion can be found at:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>
> This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it on
> 2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>
> Best,
>
> Timo
>

Jark Wu-2

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

+1 (binding)

Best,
Jark

> 在 2019年10月21日，16:52，Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道：
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Aljoscha
>
>> On 21. Oct 2019, at 10:50, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to have
>> reached an agreement.
>>
>> Please vote for the following design document:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+inference+for+Table+API+UDFs
>>
>>
>> The discussion can be found at:
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>>
>> This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it on
>> 2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Timo
>>
>

Hequn Cheng

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

+1 (binding)

Best, Hequn

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:55 PM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> > 在 2019年10月21日，16:52，Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道：
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Aljoscha
> >
> >> On 21. Oct 2019, at 10:50, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to have
> >> reached an agreement.
> >>
> >> Please vote for the following design document:
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+inference+for+Table+API+UDFs
> >>
> >>
> >> The discussion can be found at:
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it on
> >> 2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Timo
> >>
> >
>
>

jincheng sun

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

In reply to this post by Jark Wu-2

+1(binding)

Best,
Jincheng

Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月21日周一下午4:55写道：

xingcanc

RE: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

+1 (binding)

Best,
Xingcan

-----Original Message-----
From: jincheng sun <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 5:04
To: dev <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

+1(binding)

Best,
Jincheng

Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月21日周一下午4:55写道：

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> > 在 2019年10月21日，16:52，Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道：
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Aljoscha
> >
> >> On 21. Oct 2019, at 10:50, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to
> >> have reached an agreement.
> >>
> >> Please vote for the following design document:
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+
> inference+for+Table+API+UDFs
> >>
> >>
> >> The discussion can be found at:
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b
> 98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close
> >> it on
> >> 2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Timo
> >>
> >
>
>

Rong Rong

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

+1 (binding)

Thanks Timo for driving this.

--
Rong

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:19 AM <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Xingcan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jincheng sun <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 5:04
> To: dev <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs
>
> +1(binding)
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月21日周一下午4:55写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark
> >
> > > 在 2019年10月21日，16:52，Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > >> On 21. Oct 2019, at 10:50, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to
> > >> have reached an agreement.
> > >>
> > >> Please vote for the following design document:
> > >>
> > >>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+
> > inference+for+Table+API+UDFs
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The discussion can be found at:
> > >>
> > >>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b
> > 98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >>
> > >> This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close
> > >> it on
> > >> 2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >>
> > >> Timo
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Jingsong Li

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
Jingsong Lee

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:36 PM Rong Rong <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks Timo for driving this.
>
> --
> Rong
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:19 AM <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Xingcan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jincheng sun <[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 5:04
> > To: dev <[hidden email]>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs
> >
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Jincheng
> >
> > Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月21日周一下午4:55写道：
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jark
> > >
> > > > 在 2019年10月21日，16:52，Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Aljoscha
> > > >
> > > >> On 21. Oct 2019, at 10:50, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to
> > > >> have reached an agreement.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please vote for the following design document:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+
> > > inference+for+Table+API+UDFs
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The discussion can be found at:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b
> > > 98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > >>
> > > >> This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close
> > > >> it on
> > > >> 2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough
> votes.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >>
> > > >> Timo
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

--
Best, Jingsong Lee

Timo Walther-2

[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs

Hi everyone,

the voting time for FLIP-65 has passed.

There were 7 +1 votes, 6 of which are binding:
- Aljoscha (binding)
- Jark (binding)
- Hequn (binding)
- Jincheng (binding)
- Xingcan (binding)
- Rong (binding)
- Jingsong (non-binding)

There were no disapproving votes.

Thus, FLIP-65 has been accepted.

Thanks everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback,
Timo

On 24.10.19 04:42, Jingsong Li wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:36 PM Rong Rong <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thanks Timo for driving this.
>>
>> --
>> Rong
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:19 AM <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Xingcan
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: jincheng sun <[hidden email]>
>>> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 5:04
>>> To: dev <[hidden email]>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-65: New type inference for Table API UDFs
>>>
>>> +1(binding)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jincheng
>>>
>>> Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月21日周一下午4:55写道：
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jark
>>>>
>>>>> 在 2019年10月21日，16:52，Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道：
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21. Oct 2019, at 10:50, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to start a vote on FLIP-65. The discussion seems to
>>>>>> have reached an agreement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote for the following design document:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-65%3A+New+type+
>>>> inference+for+Table+API+UDFs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The discussion can be found at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b8cfd811a927d64a79f47387b7412c3b
>>>> 98a11fcb9358d3c23ef666c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This voting will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close
>>>>>> it on
>>>>>> 2019-10-24 9:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough
>> votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Timo
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>