[VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

Khachatryan Roman
Hi everyone,

I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2].

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any
objections,
I'll close it by February 5, 2021 if we have received sufficient votes.

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-158%3A+Generalized+incremental+checkpoints

[2]
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-158-Generalized-incremental-checkpoints-td47902.html



Regards,
Roman
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

curcur
As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote.

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 AM Khachatryan Roman <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any
> objections,
> I'll close it by February 5, 2021 if we have received sufficient votes.
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-158%3A+Generalized+incremental+checkpoints
>
> [2]
>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-158-Generalized-incremental-checkpoints-td47902.html
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Roman
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

Piotr Nowojski-5
I'm carrying over my +1 from the discussion thread.

Piotrek

śr., 3 lut 2021 o 05:55 Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> napisał(a):

> As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote.
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 AM Khachatryan Roman <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any
> > objections,
> > I'll close it by February 5, 2021 if we have received sufficient votes.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-158%3A+Generalized+incremental+checkpoints
> >
> > [2]
> >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-158-Generalized-incremental-checkpoints-td47902.html
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Roman
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

Arvid Heise-4
FLIP looks good to me. +1

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:00 AM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm carrying over my +1 from the discussion thread.
>
> Piotrek
>
> śr., 3 lut 2021 o 05:55 Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> napisał(a):
>
> > As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 AM Khachatryan Roman <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2].
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any
> > > objections,
> > > I'll close it by February 5, 2021 if we have received sufficient votes.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-158%3A+Generalized+incremental+checkpoints
> > >
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-158-Generalized-incremental-checkpoints-td47902.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Roman
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-158: Generalized incremental checkpoints

roman
+1 from myself (binding).

As there were no vetoes in more than 72hrs and three binding +1 the FLIP is
now accepted.

Thanks!

Regards,
Roman


On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:35 AM Arvid Heise <[hidden email]> wrote:

> FLIP looks good to me. +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:00 AM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm carrying over my +1 from the discussion thread.
> >
> > Piotrek
> >
> > śr., 3 lut 2021 o 05:55 Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> napisał(a):
> >
> > > As aforementioned in the discussion thread, +1 on this Flip vote.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:36 AM Khachatryan Roman <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-158 [1] which was discussed in [2].
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any
> > > > objections,
> > > > I'll close it by February 5, 2021 if we have received sufficient
> votes.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-158%3A+Generalized+incremental+checkpoints
> > > >
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-158-Generalized-incremental-checkpoints-td47902.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Roman
> > > >
> > >
> >
>