Hi all,
sorry, I forgot to close the voting thread for FLIP-136. I will do this now.
The voting time for FLIP-136 has passed.
- Kurt (binding)
- Jingsong (binding)
- Jark (binding)
- Xingcan (binding)
There were 4 votes, 4 of them were binding. There were no disapproving
votes.
Thus, FLIP-136 has been accepted.
Thanks, everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback!
Best,
Timo
On 28.09.20 19:03, Xingcan Cui wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Xingcan
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:52 AM Jark Wu <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Jark
>>
>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 16:22, Jingsong Li <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jingsong
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kurt Young <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Kurt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:01 PM Timo Walther <
[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> after the discussion in [1], I would like to open a second voting
>>> thread
>>>>> for FLIP-136 [2] which covers different topic to improve the
>>>>> back-and-forth communication between DataStream API and Table API.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless
>>> there
>>>>> is an objection or not enough votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Timo
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r62b47ec6812ddbafed65ac79e31ca0305099893559f1e5a991dee550%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E>>>>> [2]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-136%3A++Improve+interoperability+between+DataStream+and+Table+API>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>>
>>
>
Locked
