[VOTE] Apache Flink Release 1.9.0, release candidate #2

[Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai]

Hi all,

Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your review.
This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the preview
candidates RC0 and RC1.

Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0, as
follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)

The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].

Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog post in
the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the pull
request shortly afterwards.

The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM CET*.It is
adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.Thanks,
Gordon[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
[5]
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2

[Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai]

Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged with a fix
version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are issues to
update documents for new features.
I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should still be
updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your review.
> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the preview
> candidates RC0 and RC1.
>
> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0, as
> follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
>
> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog post in
> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the pull
> request shortly afterwards.
>
> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM CET*.It is
> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> Thanks,
> Gordon[1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> [5]
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
>

[Gyula Fóra]

Hi!

I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile enabled. I
get the following error:

mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
-Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor hadoop
version)

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect dependencies
at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed to read
artifact descriptor for
org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not transfer
artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 from/to
mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed:
sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find
valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]

This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release but it
could be good to know.

Cheers,
Gyula

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged with a fix
> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are issues to
> update documents for new features.
> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should still be
> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your review.
> > This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the preview
> > candidates RC0 and RC1.
> >
> > Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0, as
> > follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
> be
> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> >
> > Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog post in
> > the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the pull
> > request shortly afterwards.
> >
> > The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM CET*.It is
> > adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > Thanks,
> > Gordon[1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > [5]
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> >
>

[Gyula Fóra]

Hi again,

How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified? Seems like
no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the shaded hadoop
dependencies.
This seems to have worked in the past.

There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find, so I would
appreciate any pointers :)

Thanks!
Gyula

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile enabled. I
> get the following error:
>
> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor hadoop
> version)
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could not
> resolve dependencies for project
> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect dependencies
> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed to read
> artifact descriptor for
> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not transfer
> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 from/to
> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed:
> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find
> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
>
> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release but it
> could be good to know.
>
> Cheers,
> Gyula
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged with a fix
>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are issues to
>> update documents for new features.
>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should still be
>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your
>> review.
>> > This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the preview
>> > candidates RC0 and RC1.
>> >
>> > Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0, as
>> > follows:
>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
>> be
>> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>> > fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> > * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
>> >
>> > Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog post
>> in
>> > the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the pull
>> > request shortly afterwards.
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
>> > Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM CET*.It
>> is
>> > adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> > Thanks,
>> > Gordon[1]
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> > [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
>> > [5]
>> >
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
>> >
>>
>

[dwysakowicz]

Hi Gyula,

As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a look at
this message:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E

Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.

Best,

Dawid

On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified? Seems like
> no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the shaded hadoop
> dependencies.
> This seems to have worked in the past.
>
> There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find, so I would
> appreciate any pointers :)
>
> Thanks!
> Gyula
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile enabled. I
>> get the following error:
>>
>> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
>> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor hadoop
>> version)
>>
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could not
>> resolve dependencies for project
>> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect dependencies
>> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed to read
>> artifact descriptor for
>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not transfer
>> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 from/to
>> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed:
>> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find
>> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
>>
>> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release but it
>> could be good to know.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gyula
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged with a fix
>>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are issues to
>>> update documents for new features.
>>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should still be
>>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your
>>> review.
>>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the preview
>>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
>>>>
>>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0, as
>>>> follows:
>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
>>> be
>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
>>>>
>>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog post
>>> in
>>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the pull
>>>> request shortly afterwards.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
>>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM CET*.It
>>> is
>>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gordon[1]
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>> [4]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
>>>> [5]
>>>>
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2

[Gyula Fóra]

Thanks Dawid,

In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
-Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want something
different.

Cheers,
Gyula

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Gyula,
>
> As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a look at
> this message:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>
> Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>
> On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified? Seems
> like
> > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the shaded hadoop
> > dependencies.
> > This seems to have worked in the past.
> >
> > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find, so I
> would
> > appreciate any pointers :)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Gyula
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile enabled.
> I
> >> get the following error:
> >>
> >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor hadoop
> >> version)
> >>
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could not
> >> resolve dependencies for project
> >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect
> dependencies
> >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed to read
> >> artifact descriptor for
> >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not transfer
> >> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 from/to
> >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed:
> >> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to
> find
> >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> >>
> >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release but it
> >> could be good to know.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Gyula
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged with a fix
> >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are issues to
> >>> update documents for new features.
> >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should still be
> >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> [hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your
> >>> review.
> >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the preview
> >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0, as
> >>>> follows:
> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>
> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> to
> >>> be
> >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> >>>>
> >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog post
> >>> in
> >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the pull
> >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM CET*.It
> >>> is
> >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Gordon[1]
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>> [4]
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> >>>> [5]
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
>
>

[Stephan Ewen]

Hi Gyula!

Thanks for reporting this.

Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then exporting
HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
That is the recommended way these days.

Best,
Stephan



On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks Dawid,
>
> In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want something
> different.
>
> Cheers,
> Gyula
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Gyula,
> >
> > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a look at
> > this message:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > Hi again,
> > >
> > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified? Seems
> > like
> > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the shaded
> hadoop
> > > dependencies.
> > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > >
> > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find, so I
> > would
> > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Gyula
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile
> enabled.
> > I
> > >> get the following error:
> > >>
> > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor
> hadoop
> > >> version)
> > >>
> > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could not
> > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect
> > dependencies
> > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed to
> read
> > >> artifact descriptor for
> > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not
> transfer
> > >> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 from/to
> > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed:
> > >> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to
> > find
> > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > >>
> > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release but
> it
> > >> could be good to know.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Gyula
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged with a
> fix
> > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are issues to
> > >>> update documents for new features.
> > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should still
> be
> > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your
> > >>> review.
> > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the preview
> > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0, as
> > >>>> follows:
> > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > includes:
> > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> > to
> > >>> be
> > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog
> post
> > >>> in
> > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the
> pull
> > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM
> CET*.It
> > >>> is
> > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >>>> [4]
> > >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > >>>> [5]
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> >
> >
>

[Gyula Fóra]

Thanks Stephan :)
That looks easy enough, will try!

Gyula

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Gyula!
>
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then exporting
> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> That is the recommended way these days.
>
> Best,
> Stephan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Dawid,
> >
> > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want something
> > different.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gyula
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Gyula,
> > >
> > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a look at
> > > this message:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Dawid
> > >
> > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > Hi again,
> > > >
> > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified?
> Seems
> > > like
> > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the shaded
> > hadoop
> > > > dependencies.
> > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > >
> > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find, so I
> > > would
> > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Gyula
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi!
> > > >>
> > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile
> > enabled.
> > > I
> > > >> get the following error:
> > > >>
> > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor
> > hadoop
> > > >> version)
> > > >>
> > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could not
> > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect
> > > dependencies
> > > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed to
> > read
> > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not
> > transfer
> > > >> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> from/to
> > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building
> failed:
> > > >> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable
> to
> > > find
> > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > > >>
> > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release but
> > it
> > > >> could be good to know.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Gyula
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged with a
> > fix
> > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are issues
> to
> > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should still
> > be
> > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for your
> > > >>> review.
> > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the
> preview
> > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version 1.9.0,
> as
> > > >>>> follows:
> > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > comments)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > includes:
> > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> releases
> > > to
> > > >>> be
> > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> with
> > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> [4],
> > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement blog
> > post
> > > >>> in
> > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the
> > pull
> > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM
> > CET*.It
> > > >>> is
> > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
> votes.
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > >>>> [4]
> > > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > >>>> [5]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > >
> > >
> >
>

[tison]

Hi,

I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].

Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.

It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at least.

Best,
tison.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688



Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：

> Thanks Stephan :)
> That looks easy enough, will try!
>
> Gyula
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Gyula!
> >
> > Thanks for reporting this.
> >
> > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then exporting
> > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > That is the recommended way these days.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stephan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Dawid,
> > >
> > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want something
> > > different.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gyula
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > >
> > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a look
> at
> > > > this message:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Dawid
> > > >
> > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > Hi again,
> > > > >
> > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified?
> > Seems
> > > > like
> > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the shaded
> > > hadoop
> > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > >
> > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find,
> so I
> > > > would
> > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > Gyula
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile
> > > enabled.
> > > > I
> > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor
> > > hadoop
> > > > >> version)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could
> not
> > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect
> > > > dependencies
> > > > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed to
> > > read
> > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not
> > > transfer
> > > > >> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > from/to
> > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building
> > failed:
> > > > >> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable
> > to
> > > > find
> > > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release
> but
> > > it
> > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >> Gyula
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged
> with a
> > > fix
> > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are
> issues
> > to
> > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should
> still
> > > be
> > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> [1]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for
> your
> > > > >>> review.
> > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the
> > preview
> > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version
> 1.9.0,
> > as
> > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > comments)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > > includes:
> > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > releases
> > > > to
> > > > >>> be
> > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> > with
> > > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> > [4],
> > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement
> blog
> > > post
> > > > >>> in
> > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to the
> > > pull
> > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM
> > > CET*.It
> > > > >>> is
> > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
> > votes.
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > >>>> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > >>>
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Kurt Young]

Hi Zili,

Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened by me. We
have
found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it. As said in
jira, the
issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0 release.
However,
we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.

Best,
Kurt


On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
>
> Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
> but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
>
> It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at least.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
>
>
>
> Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
>
> > Thanks Stephan :)
> > That looks easy enough, will try!
> >
> > Gyula
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Gyula!
> > >
> > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > >
> > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then exporting
> > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stephan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > > >
> > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want
> something
> > > > different.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Gyula
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > > >
> > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a look
> > at
> > > > > this message:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Dawid
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version specified?
> > > Seems
> > > > > like
> > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the
> shaded
> > > > hadoop
> > > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt find,
> > so I
> > > > > would
> > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile
> > > > enabled.
> > > > > I
> > > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a vendor
> > > > hadoop
> > > > > >> version)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs: Could
> > not
> > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect
> > > > > dependencies
> > > > > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Failed
> to
> > > > read
> > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could not
> > > > transfer
> > > > > >> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > > from/to
> > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building
> > > failed:
> > > > > >> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> unable
> > > to
> > > > > find
> > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the release
> > but
> > > > it
> > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > >> Gyula
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged
> > with a
> > > > fix
> > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are
> > issues
> > > to
> > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should
> > still
> > > > be
> > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> [1]
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for
> > your
> > > > > >>> review.
> > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the
> > > preview
> > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version
> > 1.9.0,
> > > as
> > > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > > comments)
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > > > includes:
> > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > > releases
> > > > > to
> > > > > >>> be
> > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
> key
> > > with
> > > > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> > > [4],
> > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement
> > blog
> > > > post
> > > > > >>> in
> > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to
> the
> > > > pull
> > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM
> > > > CET*.It
> > > > > >>> is
> > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
> > > votes.
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > >>>> [2]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > > >>>
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[tison]

Hi Kurt,

Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should change
the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can see
the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still invalid
the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain a
release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.

Best,
tison.


Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：

> Hi Zili,
>
> Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened by me. We
> have
> found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it. As said in
> jira, the
> issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0 release.
> However,
> we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> >
> > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
> > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> >
> > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at least.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> >
> >
> >
> > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> >
> > > Thanks Stephan :)
> > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> > >
> > > Gyula
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Gyula!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > > >
> > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then exporting
> > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stephan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > > > >
> > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want
> > something
> > > > > different.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Gyula
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a
> look
> > > at
> > > > > > this message:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dawid
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
> specified?
> > > > Seems
> > > > > > like
> > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the
> > shaded
> > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt
> find,
> > > so I
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos profile
> > > > > enabled.
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a
> vendor
> > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > >> version)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs:
> Could
> > > not
> > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to collect
> > > > > > dependencies
> > > > > > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> Failed
> > to
> > > > > read
> > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could
> not
> > > > > transfer
> > > > > > >> artifact org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > > > from/to
> > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building
> > > > failed:
> > > > > > >> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> > unable
> > > > to
> > > > > > find
> > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the
> release
> > > but
> > > > > it
> > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > >> Gyula
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still tagged
> > > with a
> > > > > fix
> > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are
> > > issues
> > > > to
> > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these should
> > > still
> > > > > be
> > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> [1]
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for
> > > your
> > > > > > >>> review.
> > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following the
> > > > preview
> > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version
> > > 1.9.0,
> > > > as
> > > > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > > > comments)
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> which
> > > > > > includes:
> > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > > > releases
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >>> be
> > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
> > key
> > > > with
> > > > > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> Repository
> > > > [4],
> > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the announcement
> > > blog
> > > > > post
> > > > > > >>> in
> > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link to
> > the
> > > > > pull
> > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019, 17:00
> PM
> > > > > CET*.It
> > > > > > >>> is
> > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> affirmative
> > > > votes.
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > >>>> [2]
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Becket Qin]

Hi all,

FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API change
regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is a newly
introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this change
into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am thinking of
making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others think.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Kurt,
>
> Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should change
> the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can see
> the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still invalid
> the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain a
> release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
>
> > Hi Zili,
> >
> > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened by me. We
> > have
> > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it. As said
> in
> > jira, the
> > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0 release.
> > However,
> > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
> >
> > Best,
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> > >
> > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
> > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> > >
> > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at least.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > tison.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> > >
> > > > Thanks Stephan :)
> > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> > > >
> > > > Gyula
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Gyula!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then exporting
> > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Stephan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want
> > > something
> > > > > > different.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have a
> > look
> > > > at
> > > > > > > this message:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dawid
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
> > specified?
> > > > > Seems
> > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the
> > > shaded
> > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt
> > find,
> > > > so I
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos
> profile
> > > > > > enabled.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a
> > vendor
> > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > >> version)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs:
> > Could
> > > > not
> > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to
> collect
> > > > > > > dependencies
> > > > > > > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > Failed
> > > to
> > > > > > read
> > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: Could
> > not
> > > > > > transfer
> > > > > > > >> artifact
> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > > > > from/to
> > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
> building
> > > > > failed:
> > > > > > > >> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> > > unable
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the
> > release
> > > > but
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > > >> Gyula
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still
> tagged
> > > > with a
> > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1], are
> > > > issues
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these
> should
> > > > still
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> [1]
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready
> for
> > > > your
> > > > > > > >>> review.
> > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following
> the
> > > > > preview
> > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for version
> > > > 1.9.0,
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> specific
> > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> > which
> > > > > > > includes:
> > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> convenience
> > > > > releases
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> be
> > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with
> the
> > > key
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3],
> > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > Repository
> > > > > [4],
> > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
> announcement
> > > > blog
> > > > > > post
> > > > > > > >>> in
> > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a link
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019,
> 17:00
> > PM
> > > > > > CET*.It
> > > > > > > >>> is
> > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > affirmative
> > > > > votes.
> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > >>>> [2]
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > > > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Till Rohrmann]

Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API change
> regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is a newly
> introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this change
> into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am thinking of
> making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others think.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kurt,
> >
> > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should change
> > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can see
> > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still invalid
> > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain a
> > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
> >
> > > Hi Zili,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened by me.
> We
> > > have
> > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it. As
> said
> > in
> > > jira, the
> > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0
> release.
> > > However,
> > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> > > >
> > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
> > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> > > >
> > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at least.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > tison.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
> > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> > > > >
> > > > > Gyula
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Gyula!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then
> exporting
> > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Stephan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want
> > > > something
> > > > > > > different.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might have
> a
> > > look
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > > this message:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dawid
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
> > > specified?
> > > > > > Seems
> > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with the
> > > > shaded
> > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I couldnt
> > > find,
> > > > > so I
> > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Hi!
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos
> > profile
> > > > > > > enabled.
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not a
> > > vendor
> > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > >> version)
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project flink-hadoop-fs:
> > > Could
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to
> > collect
> > > > > > > > dependencies
> > > > > > > > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > > Failed
> > > > to
> > > > > > > read
> > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> Could
> > > not
> > > > > > > transfer
> > > > > > > > >> artifact
> > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > > > > > from/to
> > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
> > building
> > > > > > failed:
> > > > > > > > >>
> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> > > > unable
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the
> > > release
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >> Gyula
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still
> > tagged
> > > > > with a
> > > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1],
> are
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these
> > should
> > > > > still
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> [1]
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready
> > for
> > > > > your
> > > > > > > > >>> review.
> > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0, following
> > the
> > > > > > preview
> > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for
> version
> > > > > 1.9.0,
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > specific
> > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> > > which
> > > > > > > > includes:
> > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> > convenience
> > > > > > releases
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >>> be
> > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with
> > the
> > > > key
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
> [3],
> > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > Repository
> > > > > > [4],
> > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
> > announcement
> > > > > blog
> > > > > > > post
> > > > > > > > >>> in
> > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a
> link
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019,
> > 17:00
> > > PM
> > > > > > > CET*.It
> > > > > > > > >>> is
> > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > affirmative
> > > > > > votes.
> > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Becket Qin]

Hi Till,

Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So technically
speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better if we could avoid
doing that.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API change
> > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is a
> newly
> > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this change
> > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am thinking of
> > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others think.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kurt,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should change
> > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can see
> > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still
> invalid
> > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain a
> > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > tison.
> > >
> > >
> > > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
> > >
> > > > Hi Zili,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened by
> me.
> > We
> > > > have
> > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it. As
> > said
> > > in
> > > > jira, the
> > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0
> > release.
> > > > However,
> > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Kurt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> > > > >
> > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
> > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at
> least.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > tison.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
> > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Gyula!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then
> > exporting
> > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Stephan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally with
> > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I want
> > > > > something
> > > > > > > > different.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might
> have
> > a
> > > > look
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > this message:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dawid
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
> > > > specified?
> > > > > > > Seems
> > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with
> the
> > > > > shaded
> > > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I
> couldnt
> > > > find,
> > > > > > so I
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> Hi!
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos
> > > profile
> > > > > > > > enabled.
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is not
> a
> > > > vendor
> > > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > > >> version)
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
> flink-hadoop-fs:
> > > > Could
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to
> > > collect
> > > > > > > > > dependencies
> > > > > > > > > >> at org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > > > Failed
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > read
> > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > Could
> > > > not
> > > > > > > > transfer
> > > > > > > > > >> artifact
> > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > > > > > > from/to
> > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
> > > building
> > > > > > > failed:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> > > > > unable
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1]
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to the
> > > > release
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > >> Gyula
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still
> > > tagged
> > > > > > with a
> > > > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes [1],
> > are
> > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since these
> > > should
> > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official release.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> [1]
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now
> ready
> > > for
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > >>> review.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0,
> following
> > > the
> > > > > > > preview
> > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for
> > version
> > > > > > 1.9.0,
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > > specific
> > > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your
> review,
> > > > which
> > > > > > > > > includes:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> > > convenience
> > > > > > > releases
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > >>> be
> > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed
> with
> > > the
> > > > > key
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
> > [3],
> > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > > Repository
> > > > > > > [4],
> > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
> > > announcement
> > > > > > blog
> > > > > > > > post
> > > > > > > > > >>> in
> > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a
> > link
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.) 2019,
> > > 17:00
> > > > PM
> > > > > > > > CET*.It
> > > > > > > > > >>> is
> > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > > affirmative
> > > > > > > votes.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Till Rohrmann]

I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should cancel the RC
for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and hasn't been
addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on the shortlist
of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets cancelled.

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Till,
>
> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So technically
> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better if we could avoid
> doing that.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API change
> > > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is a
> > newly
> > > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this change
> > > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am thinking
> of
> > > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others think.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Kurt,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should
> change
> > > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can see
> > > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still
> > invalid
> > > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain a
> > > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > tison.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Zili,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened by
> > me.
> > > We
> > > > > have
> > > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it. As
> > > said
> > > > in
> > > > > jira, the
> > > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0
> > > release.
> > > > > However,
> > > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Kurt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> > > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> > > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
> > > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at
> > least.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > tison.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
> > > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Gyula!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then
> > > exporting
> > > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Stephan
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build the
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally
> with
> > > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I
> want
> > > > > > something
> > > > > > > > > different.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might
> > have
> > > a
> > > > > look
> > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > this message:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dawid
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
> > > > > specified?
> > > > > > > > Seems
> > > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems with
> > the
> > > > > > shaded
> > > > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I
> > couldnt
> > > > > find,
> > > > > > > so I
> > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> Hi!
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the -Pvendor-repos
> > > > profile
> > > > > > > > > enabled.
> > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is
> not
> > a
> > > > > vendor
> > > > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > > > >> version)
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
> > flink-hadoop-fs:
> > > > > Could
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to
> > > > collect
> > > > > > > > > > dependencies
> > > > > > > > > > >> at
> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > > > > Failed
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > read
> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > > Could
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > transfer
> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact
> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > > > > > > > from/to
> > > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
> > > > building
> > > > > > > > failed:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> > > > > > unable
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target -> [Help
> 1]
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to
> the
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > >> Gyula
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are still
> > > > tagged
> > > > > > > with a
> > > > > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes
> [1],
> > > are
> > > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since
> these
> > > > should
> > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official
> release.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> [1]
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now
> > ready
> > > > for
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > >>> review.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0,
> > following
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > preview
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for
> > > version
> > > > > > > 1.9.0,
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your
> > review,
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > includes:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> > > > convenience
> > > > > > > > releases
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > >>> be
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > key
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
> > > [3],
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > > > Repository
> > > > > > > > [4],
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
> > > > announcement
> > > > > > > blog
> > > > > > > > > post
> > > > > > > > > > >>> in
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with a
> > > link
> > > > to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.)
> 2019,
> > > > 17:00
> > > > > PM
> > > > > > > > > CET*.It
> > > > > > > > > > >>> is
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > > > affirmative
> > > > > > > > votes.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai]

Concerning FLINK-13231:

Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, technically it is ok to break it
across releases (including across bugfix releases?).
So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark the fix version as 1.9.1.

During the voting process, in the case a new RC is created, we usually
check the list of changes compared to the previous RC, and correct the "Fix
Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the right version (in the case,
it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1).

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should cancel the RC
> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and hasn't been
> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on the shortlist
> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets cancelled.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Till,
>>
>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So technically
>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better if we could
>> avoid
>> doing that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Till
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API
>> change
>> > > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is a
>> > newly
>> > > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this
>> change
>> > > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am
>> thinking of
>> > > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others think.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Kurt,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should
>> change
>> > > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can
>> see
>> > > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still
>> > invalid
>> > > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain a
>> > > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > tison.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Zili,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened by
>> > me.
>> > > We
>> > > > > have
>> > > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it.
>> As
>> > > said
>> > > > in
>> > > > > jira, the
>> > > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0
>> > > release.
>> > > > > However,
>> > > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > > Kurt
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
>> > > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
>> > > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
>> > > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at
>> > least.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > tison.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
>> > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
>> > > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Gyula
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <
>> [hidden email]>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Gyula!
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then
>> > > exporting
>> > > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
>> > > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > Stephan
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
>> > > [hidden email]>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build
>> the
>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally
>> with
>> > > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I
>> want
>> > > > > > something
>> > > > > > > > > different.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > Gyula
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
>> > > > > > > [hidden email]
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might
>> > have
>> > > a
>> > > > > look
>> > > > > > > at
>> > > > > > > > > > this message:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Dawid
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
>> > > > > specified?
>> > > > > > > > Seems
>> > > > > > > > > > like
>> > > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems
>> with
>> > the
>> > > > > > shaded
>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
>> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies.
>> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I
>> > couldnt
>> > > > > find,
>> > > > > > > so I
>> > > > > > > > > > would
>> > > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > > > > > Gyula
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
>> > > > > [hidden email]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Hi!
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the
>> -Pvendor-repos
>> > > > profile
>> > > > > > > > > enabled.
>> > > > > > > > > > I
>> > > > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
>> > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
>> > > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is
>> not
>> > a
>> > > > > vendor
>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
>> > > > > > > > > > >> version)
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
>> > flink-hadoop-fs:
>> > > > > Could
>> > > > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
>> > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed to
>> > > > collect
>> > > > > > > > > > dependencies
>> > > > > > > > > > >> at
>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
>> > > > > Failed
>> > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > read
>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
>> > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
>> > > Could
>> > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > > transfer
>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact
>> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
>> > > > > > > > from/to
>> > > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
>> > > > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
>> > > > building
>> > > > > > > > failed:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
>> > > > > > unable
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > find
>> > > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target ->
>> [Help 1]
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to
>> the
>> > > > > release
>> > > > > > > but
>> > > > > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Gyula
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> > > > > > > > > [hidden email]
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are
>> still
>> > > > tagged
>> > > > > > > with a
>> > > > > > > > > fix
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes
>> [1],
>> > > are
>> > > > > > > issues
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since
>> these
>> > > > should
>> > > > > > > still
>> > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official
>> release.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> [1]
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now
>> > ready
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > > your
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> review.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0,
>> > following
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > > preview
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for
>> > > version
>> > > > > > > 1.9.0,
>> > > > > > > > as
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>> > > > specific
>> > > > > > > > > comments)
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your
>> > review,
>> > > > > which
>> > > > > > > > > > includes:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
>> > > > convenience
>> > > > > > > > releases
>> > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> be
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed
>> > with
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > key
>> > > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint
>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
>> > > [3],
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> > > > > Repository
>> > > > > > > > [4],
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
>> > > > announcement
>> > > > > > > blog
>> > > > > > > > > post
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> in
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread with
>> a
>> > > link
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > pull
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.)
>> 2019,
>> > > > 17:00
>> > > > > PM
>> > > > > > > > > CET*.It
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> is
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> > > > > affirmative
>> > > > > > > > votes.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
>> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

[Becket Qin]

That sounds good to me. I was initially trying to piggyback it into an RC,
but fell behind and was not able to catch the last one.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should cancel the RC
> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and hasn't been
> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on the shortlist
> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets cancelled.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Till,
> >
> > Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So technically
> > speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better if we could
> avoid
> > doing that.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Till
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API
> change
> > > > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is a
> > > newly
> > > > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this
> change
> > > > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am
> thinking
> > of
> > > > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others think.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Kurt,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should
> > change
> > > > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can
> see
> > > > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still
> > > invalid
> > > > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain
> a
> > > > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > tison.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Zili,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened
> by
> > > me.
> > > > We
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it.
> As
> > > > said
> > > > > in
> > > > > > jira, the
> > > > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0
> > > > release.
> > > > > > However,
> > > > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Kurt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> > > > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> > > > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
> > > > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at
> > > least.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > tison.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
> > > > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then
> > > > exporting
> > > > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > > > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Stephan
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
> > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build
> the
> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally
> > with
> > > > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I
> > want
> > > > > > > something
> > > > > > > > > > different.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might
> > > have
> > > > a
> > > > > > look
> > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > > this message:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Dawid
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
> > > > > > specified?
> > > > > > > > > Seems
> > > > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems
> with
> > > the
> > > > > > > shaded
> > > > > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > > > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I
> > > couldnt
> > > > > > find,
> > > > > > > > so I
> > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi!
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the
> -Pvendor-repos
> > > > > profile
> > > > > > > > > > enabled.
> > > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > > > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is
> > not
> > > a
> > > > > > vendor
> > > > > > > > > > hadoop
> > > > > > > > > > > >> version)
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
> > > flink-hadoop-fs:
> > > > > > Could
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed
> to
> > > > > collect
> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies
> > > > > > > > > > > >> at
> > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > > > > > Failed
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > read
> > > > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > > > Could
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > transfer
> > > > > > > > > > > >> artifact
> > > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > > > > > > > > from/to
> > > > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
> > > > > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
> > > > > building
> > > > > > > > > failed:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> > > > > > > unable
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target ->
> [Help
> > 1]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related to
> > the
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Gyula
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are
> still
> > > > > tagged
> > > > > > > > with a
> > > > > > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes
> > [1],
> > > > are
> > > > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since
> > these
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official
> > release.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [1]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> <
> > > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now
> > > ready
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> review.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0,
> > > following
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > preview
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for
> > > > version
> > > > > > > > 1.9.0,
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your
> > > review,
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > includes:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> > > > > convenience
> > > > > > > > > releases
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> be
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed
> > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > key
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint
> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
> > > > [3],
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
> Central
> > > > > > Repository
> > > > > > > > > [4],
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
> > > > > announcement
> > > > > > > > blog
> > > > > > > > > > post
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> in
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread
> with a
> > > > link
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.)
> > 2019,
> > > > > 17:00
> > > > > > PM
> > > > > > > > > > CET*.It
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> is
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > > > > affirmative
> > > > > > > > > votes.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
> > > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Becket Qin]

Thanks Gordon, will do that.

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Concerning FLINK-13231:
>
> Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, technically it is ok to break
> it across releases (including across bugfix releases?).
> So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark the fix version as 1.9.1.
>
> During the voting process, in the case a new RC is created, we usually
> check the list of changes compared to the previous RC, and correct the "Fix
> Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the right version (in the case,
> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1).
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should cancel the RC
>> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and hasn't been
>> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on the shortlist
>> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets cancelled.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Till,
>>>
>>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So technically
>>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better if we could
>>> avoid
>>> doing that.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Till
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > >
>>> > > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API
>>> change
>>> > > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is a
>>> > newly
>>> > > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this
>>> change
>>> > > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am
>>> thinking of
>>> > > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others think.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > >
>>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi Kurt,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should
>>> change
>>> > > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can
>>> see
>>> > > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still
>>> > invalid
>>> > > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would contain
>>> a
>>> > > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Best,
>>> > > > tison.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hi Zili,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened
>>> by
>>> > me.
>>> > > We
>>> > > > > have
>>> > > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for it.
>>> As
>>> > > said
>>> > > > in
>>> > > > > jira, the
>>> > > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of 1.9.0
>>> > > release.
>>> > > > > However,
>>> > > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Best,
>>> > > > > Kurt
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Hi,
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
>>> > > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
>>> > > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major" priority
>>> > > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at
>>> > least.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Best,
>>> > > > > > tison.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
>>> > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
>>> > > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Gyula
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Hi Gyula!
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then
>>> > > exporting
>>> > > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
>>> > > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Best,
>>> > > > > > > > Stephan
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
>>> > > [hidden email]>
>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build
>>> the
>>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally
>>> with
>>> > > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if I
>>> want
>>> > > > > > something
>>> > > > > > > > > different.
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > > > > > > Gyula
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
>>> > > > > > > [hidden email]
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you might
>>> > have
>>> > > a
>>> > > > > look
>>> > > > > > > at
>>> > > > > > > > > > this message:
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > Best,
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > Dawid
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop version
>>> > > > > specified?
>>> > > > > > > > Seems
>>> > > > > > > > > > like
>>> > > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems
>>> with
>>> > the
>>> > > > > > shaded
>>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
>>> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I
>>> > couldnt
>>> > > > > find,
>>> > > > > > > so I
>>> > > > > > > > > > would
>>> > > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
>>> > > > > > > > > > > Gyula
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
>>> > > > > [hidden email]
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> Hi!
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the
>>> -Pvendor-repos
>>> > > > profile
>>> > > > > > > > > enabled.
>>> > > > > > > > > > I
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
>>> > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version is
>>> not
>>> > a
>>> > > > > vendor
>>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> version)
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
>>> > flink-hadoop-fs:
>>> > > > > Could
>>> > > > > > > not
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed
>>> to
>>> > > > collect
>>> > > > > > > > > > dependencies
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> at
>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
>>> > > > > Failed
>>> > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > read
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
>>> > > Could
>>> > > > > not
>>> > > > > > > > > transfer
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact
>>> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
>>> > > > > > > > from/to
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/):
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
>>> > > > building
>>> > > > > > > > failed:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
>>> > > > > > unable
>>> > > > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > > find
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target ->
>>> [Help 1]
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related
>>> to the
>>> > > > > release
>>> > > > > > > but
>>> > > > > > > > > it
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> Gyula
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>>> > > > > > > > > [hidden email]
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are
>>> still
>>> > > > tagged
>>> > > > > > > with a
>>> > > > > > > > > fix
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release notes
>>> [1],
>>> > > are
>>> > > > > > > issues
>>> > > > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since
>>> these
>>> > > > should
>>> > > > > > > still
>>> > > > > > > > > be
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official
>>> release.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> [1]
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>>> <
>>> > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now
>>> > ready
>>> > > > for
>>> > > > > > > your
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> review.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0,
>>> > following
>>> > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > preview
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for
>>> > > version
>>> > > > > > > 1.9.0,
>>> > > > > > > > as
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>> > > > specific
>>> > > > > > > > > comments)
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your
>>> > review,
>>> > > > > which
>>> > > > > > > > > > includes:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
>>> > > > convenience
>>> > > > > > > > releases
>>> > > > > > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> be
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed
>>> > with
>>> > > > the
>>> > > > > > key
>>> > > > > > > > with
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint
>>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
>>> > > [3],
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
>>> Central
>>> > > > > Repository
>>> > > > > > > > [4],
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
>>> > > > announcement
>>> > > > > > > blog
>>> > > > > > > > > post
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> in
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread
>>> with a
>>> > > link
>>> > > > to
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > > pull
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.)
>>> 2019,
>>> > > > 17:00
>>> > > > > PM
>>> > > > > > > > > CET*.It
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>> is
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>>> > > > > affirmative
>>> > > > > > > > votes.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
>>> > > > > > >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > >
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

[Jark Wu-2]

Hi all,

I just find an issue when testing connector DDLs against blink planner for
rc2.
This issue lead to the DDL doesn't work when containing timestamp/date/time
type.
I have created an issue FLINK-13699[1] and a pull request for this.

IMO, this can be a blocker issue of 1.9 release. Because
timestamp/date/time are primitive types, and this will break the DDL
feature.
However, I want to hear more thoughts from the community whether we should
recognize it as a blocker.

Thanks,
Jark


[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699



On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks Gordon, will do that.
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Concerning FLINK-13231:
> >
> > Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, technically it is ok to break
> > it across releases (including across bugfix releases?).
> > So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark the fix version as 1.9.1.
> >
> > During the voting process, in the case a new RC is created, we usually
> > check the list of changes compared to the previous RC, and correct the
> "Fix
> > Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the right version (in the case,
> > it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1).
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should cancel the RC
> >> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and hasn't been
> >> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on the
> shortlist
> >> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets cancelled.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Till
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Till,
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So technically
> >>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better if we could
> >>> avoid
> >>> doing that.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers,
> >>> > Till
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi all,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API
> >>> change
> >>> > > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector is
> a
> >>> > newly
> >>> > > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this
> >>> change
> >>> > > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am
> >>> thinking of
> >>> > > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others
> think.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi Kurt,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should
> >>> change
> >>> > > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I can
> >>> see
> >>> > > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit still
> >>> > invalid
> >>> > > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would
> contain
> >>> a
> >>> > > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Best,
> >>> > > > tison.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > Hi Zili,
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were opened
> >>> by
> >>> > me.
> >>> > > We
> >>> > > > > have
> >>> > > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for
> it.
> >>> As
> >>> > > said
> >>> > > > in
> >>> > > > > jira, the
> >>> > > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of
> 1.9.0
> >>> > > release.
> >>> > > > > However,
> >>> > > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Best,
> >>> > > > > Kurt
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <
> [hidden email]>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Hi,
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new issues
> >>> > > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> >>> > > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major"
> priority
> >>> > > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager at
> >>> > least.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Best,
> >>> > > > > > tison.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> >>> > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
> >>> > > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > Gyula
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <
> >>> [hidden email]>
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > Hi Gyula!
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and then
> >>> > > exporting
> >>> > > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> >>> > > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > Best,
> >>> > > > > > > > Stephan
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
> >>> > > [hidden email]>
> >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to build
> >>> the
> >>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project locally
> >>> with
> >>> > > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version if
> I
> >>> want
> >>> > > > > > something
> >>> > > > > > > > > different.
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> >>> > > > > > > > > Gyula
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> >>> > > > > > > [hidden email]
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you
> might
> >>> > have
> >>> > > a
> >>> > > > > look
> >>> > > > > > > at
> >>> > > > > > > > > > this message:
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > Best,
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > Dawid
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop
> version
> >>> > > > > specified?
> >>> > > > > > > > Seems
> >>> > > > > > > > > > like
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency problems
> >>> with
> >>> > the
> >>> > > > > > shaded
> >>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that I
> >>> > couldnt
> >>> > > > > find,
> >>> > > > > > > so I
> >>> > > > > > > > > > would
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > Gyula
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> >>> > > > > [hidden email]
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Hi!
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the
> >>> -Pvendor-repos
> >>> > > > profile
> >>> > > > > > > > > enabled.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > I
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> >>> > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version
> is
> >>> not
> >>> > a
> >>> > > > > vendor
> >>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> version)
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
> >>> > flink-hadoop-fs:
> >>> > > > > Could
> >>> > > > > > > not
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: Failed
> >>> to
> >>> > > > collect
> >>> > > > > > > > > > dependencies
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> at
> >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> >>> > > > > Failed
> >>> > > > > > to
> >>> > > > > > > > > read
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> >>> > > Could
> >>> > > > > not
> >>> > > > > > > > > transfer
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact
> >>> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> >>> > > > > > > > from/to
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (https://repository.mapr.com/maven/
> ):
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX
> path
> >>> > > > building
> >>> > > > > > > > failed:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> >>> > > > > > unable
> >>> > > > > > > > to
> >>> > > > > > > > > > find
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target ->
> >>> [Help 1]
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be related
> >>> to the
> >>> > > > > release
> >>> > > > > > > but
> >>> > > > > > > > > it
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Gyula
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon)
> Tai <
> >>> > > > > > > > > [hidden email]
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are
> >>> still
> >>> > > > tagged
> >>> > > > > > > with a
> >>> > > > > > > > > fix
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release
> notes
> >>> [1],
> >>> > > are
> >>> > > > > > > issues
> >>> > > > > > > > to
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0 since
> >>> these
> >>> > > > should
> >>> > > > > > > still
> >>> > > > > > > > > be
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official
> >>> release.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> [1]
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon)
> Tai
> >>> <
> >>> > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is
> now
> >>> > ready
> >>> > > > for
> >>> > > > > > > your
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> review.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0,
> >>> > following
> >>> > > > the
> >>> > > > > > > > preview
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2
> for
> >>> > > version
> >>> > > > > > > 1.9.0,
> >>> > > > > > > > as
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
> provide
> >>> > > > specific
> >>> > > > > > > > > comments)
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your
> >>> > review,
> >>> > > > > which
> >>> > > > > > > > > > includes:
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> >>> > > > convenience
> >>> > > > > > > > releases
> >>> > > > > > > > > > to
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> be
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are
> signed
> >>> > with
> >>> > > > the
> >>> > > > > > key
> >>> > > > > > > > with
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint
> >>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
> >>> > > [3],
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
> >>> Central
> >>> > > > > Repository
> >>> > > > > > > > [4],
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for the
> >>> > > > announcement
> >>> > > > > > > blog
> >>> > > > > > > > > post
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> in
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread
> >>> with a
> >>> > > link
> >>> > > > to
> >>> > > > > > the
> >>> > > > > > > > > pull
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th (Wed.)
> >>> 2019,
> >>> > > > 17:00
> >>> > > > > PM
> >>> > > > > > > > > CET*.It
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> is
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3
> PMC
> >>> > > > > affirmative
> >>> > > > > > > > votes.
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
> >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
>

[Till Rohrmann]

Hi Jark,

thanks for reporting this issue. Could this be a documented limitation of
Blink's preview version? I think we have agreed that the Blink SQL planner
will be rather a preview feature than production ready. Hence it could
still contain some bugs. My concern is that there might be still other
issues which we'll discover bit by bit and could postpone the release even
further if we say Blink bugs are blockers.

Cheers,
Till

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I just find an issue when testing connector DDLs against blink planner for
> rc2.
> This issue lead to the DDL doesn't work when containing timestamp/date/time
> type.
> I have created an issue FLINK-13699[1] and a pull request for this.
>
> IMO, this can be a blocker issue of 1.9 release. Because
> timestamp/date/time are primitive types, and this will break the DDL
> feature.
> However, I want to hear more thoughts from the community whether we should
> recognize it as a blocker.
>
> Thanks,
> Jark
>
>
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699
>
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Becket Qin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Gordon, will do that.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Concerning FLINK-13231:
> > >
> > > Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, technically it is ok to
> break
> > > it across releases (including across bugfix releases?).
> > > So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark the fix version as
> 1.9.1.
> > >
> > > During the voting process, in the case a new RC is created, we usually
> > > check the list of changes compared to the previous RC, and correct the
> > "Fix
> > > Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the right version (in the
> case,
> > > it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1).
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should cancel the
> RC
> > >> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and hasn't
> been
> > >> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on the
> > shortlist
> > >> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets cancelled.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Till
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Till,
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So technically
> > >>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better if we could
> > >>> avoid
> > >>> doing that.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving instead?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Cheers,
> > >>> > Till
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin <[hidden email]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi all,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub connector API
> > >>> change
> > >>> > > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub connector
> is
> > a
> > >>> > newly
> > >>> > > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to include this
> > >>> change
> > >>> > > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API change. I am
> > >>> thinking of
> > >>> > > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do others
> > think.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Thanks,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > Hi Kurt,
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least we should
> > >>> change
> > >>> > > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. For [2] I
> can
> > >>> see
> > >>> > > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a commit
> still
> > >>> > invalid
> > >>> > > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads would
> > contain
> > >>> a
> > >>> > > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Best,
> > >>> > > > tison.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:42写道：
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > > Hi Zili,
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned were
> opened
> > >>> by
> > >>> > me.
> > >>> > > We
> > >>> > > > > have
> > >>> > > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was opened for
> > it.
> > >>> As
> > >>> > > said
> > >>> > > > in
> > >>> > > > > jira, the
> > >>> > > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be blocker of
> > 1.9.0
> > >>> > > release.
> > >>> > > > > However,
> > >>> > > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch.
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > Best,
> > >>> > > > > Kurt
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >>> > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > Hi,
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were two new
> issues
> > >>> > > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2].
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked as
> > >>> > > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to "Major"
> > priority
> > >>> > > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0.
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our release manager
> at
> > >>> > least.
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > Best,
> > >>> > > > > > tison.
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687
> > >>> > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> 于2019年8月12日周一 下午5:10写道：
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > Thanks Stephan :)
> > >>> > > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try!
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > Gyula
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen <
> > >>> [hidden email]>
> > >>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Hi Gyula!
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this.
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without Hadoop and
> then
> > >>> > > exporting
> > >>> > > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs?
> > >>> > > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days.
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Best,
> > >>> > > > > > > > Stephan
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra <
> > >>> > > [hidden email]>
> > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid,
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I need to
> build
> > >>> the
> > >>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded project
> locally
> > >>> with
> > >>> > > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop version
> if
> > I
> > >>> want
> > >>> > > > > > something
> > >>> > > > > > > > > different.
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > >>> > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <
> > >>> > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula,
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven repository, you
> > might
> > >>> > have
> > >>> > > a
> > >>> > > > > look
> > >>> > > > > > > at
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > this message:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Dawid
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the hadoop
> > version
> > >>> > > > > specified?
> > >>> > > > > > > > Seems
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > like
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into dependency
> problems
> > >>> with
> > >>> > the
> > >>> > > > > > shaded
> > >>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation somewhere that
> I
> > >>> > couldnt
> > >>> > > > > find,
> > >>> > > > > > > so I
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > would
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :)
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula Fóra <
> > >>> > > > > [hidden email]
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Hi!
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with the
> > >>> -Pvendor-repos
> > >>> > > > profile
> > >>> > > > > > > > > enabled.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > I
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> get the following error:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pvendor-repos
> > >>> > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the hadoop version
> > is
> > >>> not
> > >>> > a
> > >>> > > > > vendor
> > >>> > > > > > > > > hadoop
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> version)
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
> > >>> > flink-hadoop-fs:
> > >>> > > > > Could
> > >>> > > > > > > not
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0:
> Failed
> > >>> to
> > >>> > > > collect
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > dependencies
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> at
> > >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > >>> > > > > Failed
> > >>> > > > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > > > > read
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0:
> > >>> > > Could
> > >>> > > > > not
> > >>> > > > > > > > > transfer
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact
> > >>> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0
> > >>> > > > > > > > from/to
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases (
> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/
> > ):
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX
> > path
> > >>> > > > building
> > >>> > > > > > > > failed:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException:
> > >>> > > > > > unable
> > >>> > > > > > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > find
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested target ->
> > >>> [Help 1]
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not be
> related
> > >>> to the
> > >>> > > > > release
> > >>> > > > > > > but
> > >>> > > > > > > > > it
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Gyula
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon)
> > Tai <
> > >>> > > > > > > > > [hidden email]
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved issues that are
> > >>> still
> > >>> > > > tagged
> > >>> > > > > > > with a
> > >>> > > > > > > > > fix
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA release
> > notes
> > >>> [1],
> > >>> > > are
> > >>> > > > > > > issues
> > >>> > > > > > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with 1.9.0
> since
> > >>> these
> > >>> > > > should
> > >>> > > > > > > still
> > >>> > > > > > > > > be
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the official
> > >>> release.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> [1]
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon)
> > Tai
> > >>> <
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > [hidden email]>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is
> > now
> > >>> > ready
> > >>> > > > for
> > >>> > > > > > > your
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> review.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate for 1.9.0,
> > >>> > following
> > >>> > > > the
> > >>> > > > > > > > preview
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #2
> > for
> > >>> > > version
> > >>> > > > > > > 1.9.0,
> > >>> > > > > > > > as
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> follows:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
> > provide
> > >>> > > > specific
> > >>> > > > > > > > > comments)
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is available for
> your
> > >>> > review,
> > >>> > > > > which
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > includes:
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release and
> binary
> > >>> > > > convenience
> > >>> > > > > > > > releases
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> be
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are
> > signed
> > >>> > with
> > >>> > > > the
> > >>> > > > > > key
> > >>> > > > > > > > with
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint
> > >>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A
> > >>> > > [3],
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
> > >>> Central
> > >>> > > > > Repository
> > >>> > > > > > > > [4],
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc2” [5].
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull request for
> the
> > >>> > > > announcement
> > >>> > > > > > > blog
> > >>> > > > > > > > > post
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> in
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this voting thread
> > >>> with a
> > >>> > > link
> > >>> > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > the
> > >>> > > > > > > > > pull
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least 72 hours*.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 14th
> (Wed.)
> > >>> 2019,
> > >>> > > > 17:00
> > >>> > > > > PM
> > >>> > > > > > > > > CET*.It
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> is
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3
> > PMC
> > >>> > > > > affirmative
> > >>> > > > > > > > votes.
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1]
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [2]
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [3]
> > >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [4]
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [5]
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>