(DEPRECATED) Apache Flink Mailing List archive.

[VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

Classic

List

Threaded

43 messages Options

123

Stephan Ewen

[VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
contribution to Apache Flink.

The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
found here:
https://statefun.io/
https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions

This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is interested
in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.

Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a great
match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community into a
new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use cases,
but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.

I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates well
with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain this
new component well.

This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws [1].
Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
(excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or until we
achieve the 2/3rd majority.

Happy voting!

Best,
Stephan

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026

Robert Metzger

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
> contribution to Apache Flink.
>
> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
> found here:
> https://statefun.io/
> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
>
> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is interested
> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
>
> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a great
> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community into a
> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use cases,
> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
>
> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates well
> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain this
> new component well.
>
> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws [1].
> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or until we
> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
>
> Happy voting!
>
> Best,
> Stephan
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>

Till Rohrmann

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
> > contribution to Apache Flink.
> >
> > The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
> > found here:
> > https://statefun.io/
> > https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> >
> > This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is interested
> > in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> >
> > Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a
> great
> > match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community
> into a
> > new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use cases,
> > but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> >
> > I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates
> well
> > with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain this
> > new component well.
> >
> > This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws [1].
> > Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> > (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or until
> we
> > achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> >
> > Happy voting!
> >
> > Best,
> > Stephan
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >
>

Timo Walther-2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

Thanks,
Timo

On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
>>>
>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
>>> found here:
>>> https://statefun.io/
>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
>>>
>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is interested
>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
>>>
>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a
>> great
>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community
>> into a
>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use cases,
>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
>>>
>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates
>> well
>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain this
>>> new component well.
>>>
>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws [1].
>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or until
>> we
>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
>>>
>>> Happy voting!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026

Thomas Weise

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Timo
>
>
> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
> >>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> >>>
> >>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
> >>> found here:
> >>> https://statefun.io/
> >>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> >>>
> >>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> interested
> >>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> >>>
> >>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a
> >> great
> >>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community
> >> into a
> >>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> cases,
> >>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> >>>
> >>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates
> >> well
> >>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
> this
> >>> new component well.
> >>>
> >>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
> [1].
> >>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> >>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
> until
> >> we
> >>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> >>>
> >>> Happy voting!
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Stephan
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>
>
>

Fabian Hueske-2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <[hidden email]>:

> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Timo
> >
> >
> > On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Till
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions
> code
> > >>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > >>>
> > >>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can
> be
> > >>> found here:
> > >>> https://statefun.io/
> > >>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > >>>
> > >>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> > interested
> > >>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > >>>
> > >>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a
> > >> great
> > >>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community
> > >> into a
> > >>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> > cases,
> > >>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> > >>>
> > >>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates
> > >> well
> > >>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
> > this
> > >>> new component well.
> > >>>
> > >>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
> > [1].
> > >>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> > >>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
> > until
> > >> we
> > >>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > >>>
> > >>> Happy voting!
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Stephan
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >
> >
> >
>

Aljoscha Krettek-2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

In reply to this post by Thomas Weise

+1 (binding)

Aljoscha

> On 21. Oct 2019, at 16:18, Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Timo
>>
>>
>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Till
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
>>>>>
>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
>>>>> found here:
>>>>> https://statefun.io/
>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
>> interested
>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a
>>>> great
>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community
>>>> into a
>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
>> cases,
>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates
>>>> well
>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
>> this
>>>>> new component well.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
>> [1].
>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
>> until
>>>> we
>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
>>>>>
>>>>> Happy voting!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Stephan
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>>
>>
>>

Kostas Kloudas-4

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:18 PM Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Aljoscha
>
> > On 21. Oct 2019, at 16:18, Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Timo
> >>
> >>
> >> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Till
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
> >>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
> >>>>> found here:
> >>>>> https://statefun.io/
> >>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> >> interested
> >>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a
> >>>> great
> >>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community
> >>>> into a
> >>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> >> cases,
> >>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates
> >>>> well
> >>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
> >> this
> >>>>> new component well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
> >> [1].
> >>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> >>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
> >> until
> >>>> we
> >>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Happy voting!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Stephan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

tison

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
tison.

Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月21日周一下午11:49写道：

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:18 PM Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Aljoscha
> >
> > > On 21. Oct 2019, at 16:18, Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Timo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Till
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions
> code
> > >>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website
> can be
> > >>>>> found here:
> > >>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > >>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> > >> interested
> > >>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is
> a
> > >>>> great
> > >>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> community
> > >>>> into a
> > >>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> > >> cases,
> > >>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> integrates
> > >>>> well
> > >>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
> > >> this
> > >>>>> new component well.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
> > >> [1].
> > >>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> > >>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
> > >> until
> > >>>> we
> > >>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Happy voting!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Stephan
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Stephan Ewen

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM Zili Chen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月21日周一下午11:49写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:18 PM Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > > > On 21. Oct 2019, at 16:18, Thomas Weise <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Timo
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Cheers,
> > > >>> Till
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful
> Functions
> > code
> > > >>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website
> > can be
> > > >>>>> found here:
> > > >>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> > > >> interested
> > > >>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project
> is
> > a
> > > >>>> great
> > > >>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> > community
> > > >>>> into a
> > > >>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> > > >> cases,
> > > >>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> > integrates
> > > >>>> well
> > > >>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to
> maintain
> > > >> this
> > > >>>>> new component well.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink
> bylaws
> > > >> [1].
> > > >>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> > > >>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC,
> or
> > > >> until
> > > >>>> we
> > > >>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Happy voting!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>> Stephan
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Kurt Young

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

In reply to this post by Fabian Hueske-2

+1 (binding)

Best,
Kurt

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <[hidden email]>:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Timo
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Till
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions
> > code
> > > >>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can
> > be
> > > >>> found here:
> > > >>> https://statefun.io/
> > > >>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> > > interested
> > > >>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is
> a
> > > >> great
> > > >>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> community
> > > >> into a
> > > >>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> > > cases,
> > > >>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> integrates
> > > >> well
> > > >>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
> > > this
> > > >>> new component well.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
> > > [1].
> > > >>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> > > >>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
> > > until
> > > >> we
> > > >>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Happy voting!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Stephan
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Dian Fu-2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Regards,
Dian

> 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Timo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions
>>> code
>>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can
>>> be
>>>>>>> found here:
>>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
>>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
>>>> interested
>>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is
>> a
>>>>>> great
>>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
>> community
>>>>>> into a
>>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
>>>> cases,
>>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
>> integrates
>>>>>> well
>>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
>>>> this
>>>>>>> new component well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
>>>> [1].
>>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
>>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
>>>> until
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Happy voting!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Stephan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Hequn Cheng

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Best, Hequn

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Dian
>
> > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <[hidden email]
> >:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Timo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> >>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Till
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions
> >>> code
> >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can
> >>> be
> >>>>>>> found here:
> >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> >>>> interested
> >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is
> >> a
> >>>>>> great
> >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> >> community
> >>>>>> into a
> >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> >>>> cases,
> >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> >> integrates
> >>>>>> well
> >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain
> >>>> this
> >>>>>>> new component well.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws
> >>>> [1].
> >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or
> >>>> until
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Happy voting!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Stephan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Jark Wu-2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
Jark

On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best, Hequn
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dian
> >
> > > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <
> [hidden email]
> > >:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Timo
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>> Till
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> [hidden email]
> > >>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful
> Functions
> > >>> code
> > >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website
> can
> > >>> be
> > >>>>>>> found here:
> > >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> > >>>> interested
> > >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project
> is
> > >> a
> > >>>>>> great
> > >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> > >> community
> > >>>>>> into a
> > >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use
> > >>>> cases,
> > >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> > >> integrates
> > >>>>>> well
> > >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to
> maintain
> > >>>> this
> > >>>>>>> new component well.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink
> bylaws
> > >>>> [1].
> > >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
> > >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC,
> or
> > >>>> until
> > >>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Happy voting!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>> Stephan
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Biao Liu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks,
Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/

On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best, Hequn
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dian
> > >
> > > > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Kurt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Timo
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>> Till
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
> >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful
> > Functions
> > > >>> code
> > > >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website
> > can
> > > >>> be
> > > >>>>>>> found here:
> > > >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is
> > > >>>> interested
> > > >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project
> > is
> > > >> a
> > > >>>>>> great
> > > >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> > > >> community
> > > >>>>>> into a
> > > >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such
> use
> > > >>>> cases,
> > > >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> > > >> integrates
> > > >>>>>> well
> > > >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to
> > maintain
> > > >>>> this
> > > >>>>>>> new component well.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink
> > bylaws
> > > >>>> [1].
> > > >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6
> days
> > > >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC,
> > or
> > > >>>> until
> > > >>>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Happy voting!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>> Stephan
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Zhu Zhu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks,
Zhu Zhu

Biao Liu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月22日周二上午11:06写道：

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Best, Hequn
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dian
> > > >
> > > > > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Kurt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <[hidden email]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>> Timo
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > > >>>>> Till
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful
> > > Functions
> > > > >>> code
> > > > >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and
> website
> > > can
> > > > >>> be
> > > > >>>>>>> found here:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community
> is
> > > > >>>> interested
> > > > >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this
> project
> > > is
> > > > >> a
> > > > >>>>>> great
> > > > >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> > > > >> community
> > > > >>>>>> into a
> > > > >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such
> > use
> > > > >>>> cases,
> > > > >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> > > > >> integrates
> > > > >>>>>> well
> > > > >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to
> > > maintain
> > > > >>>> this
> > > > >>>>>>> new component well.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink
> > > bylaws
> > > > >>>> [1].
> > > > >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6
> > days
> > > > >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00
> UTC,
> > > or
> > > > >>>> until
> > > > >>>>>> we
> > > > >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Happy voting!
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>>>> Stephan
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> [1]
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

vino yang

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
Vino

Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月22日周二下午4:33写道：

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu Zhu
>
> Biao Liu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月22日周二上午11:06写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jark
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Best, Hequn
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Dian
> > > > >
> > > > > > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Kurt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>> Timo
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > > > >>>>> Till
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful
> > > > Functions
> > > > > >>> code
> > > > > >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and
> > website
> > > > can
> > > > > >>> be
> > > > > >>>>>>> found here:
> > > > > >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community
> > is
> > > > > >>>> interested
> > > > > >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this
> > project
> > > > is
> > > > > >> a
> > > > > >>>>>> great
> > > > > >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> > > > > >> community
> > > > > >>>>>> into a
> > > > > >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in
> such
> > > use
> > > > > >>>> cases,
> > > > > >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently
> is.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> > > > > >> integrates
> > > > > >>>>>> well
> > > > > >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to
> > > > maintain
> > > > > >>>> this
> > > > > >>>>>>> new component well.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the
> Flink
> > > > bylaws
> > > > > >>>> [1].
> > > > > >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least
> 6
> > > days
> > > > > >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00
> > UTC,
> > > > or
> > > > > >>>> until
> > > > > >>>>>> we
> > > > > >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Happy voting!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > > > >>>>>>> Stephan
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> [1]
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

In reply to this post by Zhu Zhu

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
Zhijiang

------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]>
Send Time:2019 Oct. 22 (Tue.) 16:33
To:dev <[hidden email]>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks,
Zhu Zhu

Biao Liu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月22日周二上午11:06写道：

Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

Gordon

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 10:58 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]>
> Send Time:2019 Oct. 22 (Tue.) 16:33
> To:dev <[hidden email]>
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu Zhu
>
> Biao Liu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月22日周二上午11:06写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jark
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Best, Hequn
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Dian
> > > > >
> > > > > > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Kurt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>> Timo
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > > > >>>>> Till
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful
> > > > Functions
> > > > > >>> code
> > > > > >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and
> > website
> > > > can
> > > > > >>> be
> > > > > >>>>>>> found here:
> > > > > >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community
> > is
> > > > > >>>> interested
> > > > > >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this
> > project
> > > > is
> > > > > >> a
> > > > > >>>>>> great
> > > > > >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the
> > > > > >> community
> > > > > >>>>>> into a
> > > > > >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in
> such
> > > use
> > > > > >>>> cases,
> > > > > >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently
> is.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this
> > > > > >> integrates
> > > > > >>>>>> well
> > > > > >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to
> > > > maintain
> > > > > >>>> this
> > > > > >>>>>>> new component well.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the
> Flink
> > > > bylaws
> > > > > >>>> [1].
> > > > > >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least
> 6
> > > days
> > > > > >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00
> > UTC,
> > > > or
> > > > > >>>> until
> > > > > >>>>>> we
> > > > > >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Happy voting!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > > > >>>>>>> Stephan
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> [1]
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Becket Qin

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

+1 (binding)

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:44 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Gordon
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 10:58 PM Zhijiang <[hidden email]
> .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhijiang
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From:Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]>
> > Send Time:2019 Oct. 22 (Tue.) 16:33
> > To:dev <[hidden email]>
> > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zhu Zhu
> >
> > Biao Liu <[hidden email]> 于2019年10月22日周二上午11:06写道：
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Jark
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Best, Hequn
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Dian
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Kurt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>> Timo
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > > > > >>>>> Till
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >
> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful
> > > > > Functions
> > > > > > >>> code
> > > > > > >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and
> > > website
> > > > > can
> > > > > > >>> be
> > > > > > >>>>>>> found here:
> > > > > > >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > > > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink
> community
> > > is
> > > > > > >>>> interested
> > > > > > >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful
> Functions.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this
> > > project
> > > > > is
> > > > > > >> a
> > > > > > >>>>>> great
> > > > > > >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow
> the
> > > > > > >> community
> > > > > > >>>>>> into a
> > > > > > >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in
> > such
> > > > use
> > > > > > >>>> cases,
> > > > > > >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently
> > is.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure
> this
> > > > > > >> integrates
> > > > > > >>>>>> well
> > > > > > >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers
> to
> > > > > maintain
> > > > > > >>>> this
> > > > > > >>>>>>> new component well.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the
> > Flink
> > > > > bylaws
> > > > > > >>>> [1].
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at
> least
> > 6
> > > > days
> > > > > > >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th
> 12:00
> > > UTC,
> > > > > or
> > > > > > >>>> until
> > > > > > >>>>>> we
> > > > > > >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Happy voting!
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Stephan
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> [1]
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

123