Hi,
The initial recommendation for a user@ list was to wait and see the amount of mails on the dev@ list. I personally think that the traffic on dev@ is pretty high. Tez for example had between January and May less than 100 messages, but they have a user@ list. Similarly BatchEE is also below 100 for months and they have a user@ list. We are already at 250 messages in the middle of the month, so I vote for requesting a user@ list. Robert |
On 16 Jul 2014, at 17:04, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > The initial recommendation for a user@ list was to wait and see the amount > of mails on the dev@ list. > > I personally think that the traffic on dev@ is pretty high. Tez for example > had between January and May less than 100 messages, but they have a user@ > list. > Similarly BatchEE is also below 100 for months and they have a user@ list. > > We are already at 250 messages in the middle of the month, so I vote for > requesting a user@ list. +1 |
In reply to this post by Robert Metzger
Ok, so If no objection I can submit user@ mailing list creation
request end of day (PST) - Henry On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > The initial recommendation for a user@ list was to wait and see the amount > of mails on the dev@ list. > > I personally think that the traffic on dev@ is pretty high. Tez for example > had between January and May less than 100 messages, but they have a user@ > list. > Similarly BatchEE is also below 100 for months and they have a user@ list. > > We are already at 250 messages in the middle of the month, so I vote for > requesting a user@ list. > > > Robert |
+1
Let's go for a users list. 2014-07-17 19:54 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>: > Ok, so If no objection I can submit user@ mailing list creation > request end of day (PST) > > - Henry > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > The initial recommendation for a user@ list was to wait and see the > amount > > of mails on the dev@ list. > > > > I personally think that the traffic on dev@ is pretty high. Tez for > example > > had between January and May less than 100 messages, but they have a user@ > > list. > > Similarly BatchEE is also below 100 for months and they have a user@ > list. > > > > We are already at 250 messages in the middle of the month, so I vote for > > requesting a user@ list. > > > > > > Robert > |
+1
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > Let's go for a users list. > > > 2014-07-17 19:54 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>: > > > Ok, so If no objection I can submit user@ mailing list creation > > request end of day (PST) > > > > - Henry > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > The initial recommendation for a user@ list was to wait and see the > > amount > > > of mails on the dev@ list. > > > > > > I personally think that the traffic on dev@ is pretty high. Tez for > > example > > > had between January and May less than 100 messages, but they have a > user@ > > > list. > > > Similarly BatchEE is also below 100 for months and they have a user@ > > list. > > > > > > We are already at 250 messages in the middle of the month, so I vote > for > > > requesting a user@ list. > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > |
In reply to this post by Robert Metzger
Request for user@ list is submitted, once it is ready I will announce
it to dev@ list Thanks, - Henry On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > The initial recommendation for a user@ list was to wait and see the amount > of mails on the dev@ list. > > I personally think that the traffic on dev@ is pretty high. Tez for example > had between January and May less than 100 messages, but they have a user@ > list. > Similarly BatchEE is also below 100 for months and they have a user@ list. > > We are already at 250 messages in the middle of the month, so I vote for > requesting a user@ list. > > > Robert |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |