Re: No programming model documentation for release 0.5?

[Fabian Hueske]

If we do it the right way, the prog model docs can help to make the
language API (Java, Scala, and soon Python) docs more concise.

We would need to do some rephrasing to have a consistent terminology though.

Fabian


2014-06-09 19:02 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>:

> I found the programming model is useful so I am +1 to add it again to the
> doc.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > I think that was somewhat deliberately omitted, because that section had
> a
> > lot of overlap with the java api docs.
> >
> > Do you think we should add them again?
>

[Robert Metzger]

I filed a JIRA to add the page to the documentation again:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-923



On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:

> If we do it the right way, the prog model docs can help to make the
> language API (Java, Scala, and soon Python) docs more concise.
>
> We would need to do some rephrasing to have a consistent terminology
> though.
>
> Fabian
>
>
> 2014-06-09 19:02 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>:
>
> > I found the programming model is useful so I am +1 to add it again to the
> > doc.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > I think that was somewhat deliberately omitted, because that section
> had
> > a
> > > lot of overlap with the java api docs.
> > >
> > > Do you think we should add them again?
> >
>

[Henry Saputra]

Awesome, thanks Robert!

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I filed a JIRA to add the page to the documentation again:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-923
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> If we do it the right way, the prog model docs can help to make the
>> language API (Java, Scala, and soon Python) docs more concise.
>>
>> We would need to do some rephrasing to have a consistent terminology
>> though.
>>
>> Fabian
>>
>>
>> 2014-06-09 19:02 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> > I found the programming model is useful so I am +1 to add it again to the
>> > doc.
>> >
>> > - Henry
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > I think that was somewhat deliberately omitted, because that section
>> had
>> > a
>> > > lot of overlap with the java api docs.
>> > >
>> > > Do you think we should add them again?
>> >
>>

[Kostas Tzoumas]

I will work on this for the planned documentation port.


On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Awesome, thanks Robert!
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > I filed a JIRA to add the page to the documentation again:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-923
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> If we do it the right way, the prog model docs can help to make the
> >> language API (Java, Scala, and soon Python) docs more concise.
> >>
> >> We would need to do some rephrasing to have a consistent terminology
> >> though.
> >>
> >> Fabian
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-06-09 19:02 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[hidden email]>:
> >>
> >> > I found the programming model is useful so I am +1 to add it again to
> the
> >> > doc.
> >> >
> >> > - Henry
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> > > I think that was somewhat deliberately omitted, because that section
> >> had
> >> > a
> >> > > lot of overlap with the java api docs.
> >> > >
> >> > > Do you think we should add them again?
> >> >
> >>
>