[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-140: Introduce bounded style execution for keyed streams

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-140: Introduce bounded style execution for keyed streams

dwysakowicz
Hi all,

The voting time for FLIP-140 has passed. I'm closing the vote now.

There were 4 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
- Aljoscha (binding)
- Seth (binding)
- Dawid (binding)
- Yun Gao (non-binding)

There were no disapproving votes.

Thus, FLIP-140 has been accepted.

Thanks everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback!

Best,
Dawid



signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-140: Introduce bounded style execution for keyed streams

Yu Li
Hi Dawid,

Thanks for driving the discussion and voting, and sorry for being late. Is
it possible to defer the conclusion a little bit so we could give a review
from the state backend side? Thanks.

Best Regards,
Yu


On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 14:42, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The voting time for FLIP-140 has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
>
> There were 4 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
> - Aljoscha (binding)
> - Seth (binding)
> - Dawid (binding)
> - Yun Gao (non-binding)
>
> There were no disapproving votes.
>
> Thus, FLIP-140 has been accepted.
>
> Thanks everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback!
>
> Best,
> Dawid
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-140: Introduce bounded style execution for keyed streams

dwysakowicz
Yes, we can. Do you have any concerns already?

On 17/09/2020 10:10, Yu Li wrote:

> Hi Dawid,
>
> Thanks for driving the discussion and voting, and sorry for being late. Is
> it possible to defer the conclusion a little bit so we could give a review
> from the state backend side? Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 14:42, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The voting time for FLIP-140 has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
>>
>> There were 4 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
>> - Aljoscha (binding)
>> - Seth (binding)
>> - Dawid (binding)
>> - Yun Gao (non-binding)
>>
>> There were no disapproving votes.
>>
>> Thus, FLIP-140 has been accepted.
>>
>> Thanks everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback!
>>
>> Best,
>> Dawid
>>
>>
>>


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-140: Introduce bounded style execution for keyed streams

Yu Li
I've just added some comments in the discussion thread [1]. Thanks.

Best Regards,
Yu

[1] https://s.apache.org/esigy


On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 16:29, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Yes, we can. Do you have any concerns already?
>
> On 17/09/2020 10:10, Yu Li wrote:
> > Hi Dawid,
> >
> > Thanks for driving the discussion and voting, and sorry for being late.
> Is
> > it possible to defer the conclusion a little bit so we could give a
> review
> > from the state backend side? Thanks.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 14:42, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> The voting time for FLIP-140 has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
> >>
> >> There were 4 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
> >> - Aljoscha (binding)
> >> - Seth (binding)
> >> - Dawid (binding)
> >> - Yun Gao (non-binding)
> >>
> >> There were no disapproving votes.
> >>
> >> Thus, FLIP-140 has been accepted.
> >>
> >> Thanks everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Dawid
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-140: Introduce bounded style execution for keyed streams

Yu Li
+1(belated) for the latest FLIP document.

Thanks for addressing my belated questions/comments and updating the doc
accordingly, Dawid!

Best Regards,
Yu


On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 21:31, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I've just added some comments in the discussion thread [1]. Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> [1] https://s.apache.org/esigy
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 16:29, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, we can. Do you have any concerns already?
>>
>> On 17/09/2020 10:10, Yu Li wrote:
>> > Hi Dawid,
>> >
>> > Thanks for driving the discussion and voting, and sorry for being late.
>> Is
>> > it possible to defer the conclusion a little bit so we could give a
>> review
>> > from the state backend side? Thanks.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Yu
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 14:42, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> The voting time for FLIP-140 has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
>> >>
>> >> There were 4 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
>> >> - Aljoscha (binding)
>> >> - Seth (binding)
>> >> - Dawid (binding)
>> >> - Yun Gao (non-binding)
>> >>
>> >> There were no disapproving votes.
>> >>
>> >> Thus, FLIP-140 has been accepted.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback!
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Dawid
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>