Planning the 0.9 Release

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
25 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Planning the 0.9 Release

Robert Metzger
What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both marked as
blockers.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still need to
> be addressed. At least for me, those were
>
> - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8
> - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635
> - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916
>
> @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager.
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:00, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > What is the status of the 0.9 release planning.
> > >
> > > It seems like many of the open issues from the document have been
> closed.
> > > When do you think are we able to fork off the "release-0.9" branch and
> > > create the first RC ?
> >
> > It would be great to do it in the next days. If there are no objections,
> I
> > would like to act as release manager. :-)
> >
> > Critical issues:
> >
> > - Skipped buffer (
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Buffer-re-ordering-problem-td6009.html
> )
> > (I'm on it)
> > - Execution graph deadlock (FLINK-2133)
> >
> > Big open issue:
> > - There has been consensus to merge the static code analysis PR for this
> > release, which needs some further testing (I'm on it)
> > - Batch scheduling. I think Till and Stephan are working on this. Can you
> > guys give an estimate whether we will be able to have it in the release?
> >
> > The other big issues have been postponed.
> >
> > – Ufuk
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Planning the 0.9 Release

Ufuk Celebi-2

On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both marked as
> blockers.

FLINK-2177 is resolved. Is 2054 ("StreamOperator rework removed copy calls when passing output to a chained operator") still a release blocker?

> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still need to
>> be addressed. At least for me, those were
>>
>> - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8
>> - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635
>> - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916
>>
>> @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager.

Yes, please do so, Max! :) Thanks!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Planning the 0.9 Release

Márton Balassi
FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
solving it asap.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both marked
> as
> > blockers.
>
> FLINK-2177 is resolved. Is 2054 ("StreamOperator rework removed copy calls
> when passing output to a chained operator") still a release blocker?
>
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still need
> to
> >> be addressed. At least for me, those were
> >>
> >> - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8
> >> - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635
> >> - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916
> >>
> >> @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager.
>
> Yes, please do so, Max! :) Thanks!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Planning the 0.9 Release

Gyula Fóra-2
I agree with Marton. I thought Aljoscha was working on that.

On Monday, June 8, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
> solving it asap.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email] <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both
> marked
> > as
> > > blockers.
> >
> > FLINK-2177 is resolved. Is 2054 ("StreamOperator rework removed copy
> calls
> > when passing output to a chained operator") still a release blocker?
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still
> need
> > to
> > >> be addressed. At least for me, those were
> > >>
> > >> - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8
> > >> - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635
> > >> - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916
> > >>
> > >> @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager.
> >
> > Yes, please do so, Max! :) Thanks!
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Planning the 0.9 Release

Márton Balassi
The problem is still there. @Aljoscha: It would be great if you could take
it.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Gyula Fóra <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I agree with Marton. I thought Aljoscha was working on that.
>
> On Monday, June 8, 2015, Márton Balassi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
> > solving it asap.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2054 ? They are both
> > marked
> > > as
> > > > blockers.
> > >
> > > FLINK-2177 is resolved. Is 2054 ("StreamOperator rework removed copy
> > calls
> > > when passing output to a chained operator") still a release blocker?
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm excited about the upcoming release. I think a few issues still
> > need
> > > to
> > > >> be addressed. At least for me, those were
> > > >>
> > > >> - fixing errors messages on builds with the JDK8
> > > >> - removing Apache thrift dependencies as of
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1635
> > > >> - Possibly fix an issue in the delta iterations:
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1916
> > > >>
> > > >> @Ufuk: If you're too busy, I could also act as a release manager.
> > >
> > > Yes, please do so, Max! :) Thanks!
> >
>
12