MapState support for operator state

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

MapState support for operator state

Dániel Berecz-2
Hi everyone,

I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having MapState
available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?

Best regards,
Daniel Berecz
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MapState support for operator state

Till Rohrmann
Hi Daniel,

Didn't you post this question before? Let's not spread the discussion out
over multiple threads.

Cheers,
Till

On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:27 PM Dániel Berecz <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having MapState
> available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Berecz
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MapState support for operator state

Dániel Berecz
Hi Till,

sorry for this. I sent this e-mail from my other account, which is not
subscribed to this thread and according to the website should have been
rejected. Once I realized it I sent another e-mail from the correct account.

Bestt,
Daniel

Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 8., H,
9:18):

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Didn't you post this question before? Let's not spread the discussion out
> over multiple threads.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:27 PM Dániel Berecz <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having
> MapState
> > available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Daniel Berecz
> >
>