Dropping Java 7 support

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Dropping Java 7 support

Stephan Ewen
Hi all!

Over the last days, there was a longer poll running concerning dropping the
support for Java 7.

The feedback from users was unanimous - in favor of dropping Java 7 and
going ahead with Java 8.

So let's do that!

Greetings,
Stephan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
Date: Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ?
To: user <[hidden email]>


All right, thanks everyone.

I think the consensus here is clear :-)

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:17 PM, nragon <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> +1 dropping java 7
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-maili
> ng-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/POLL-Who-still-uses
> -Java-7-with-Flink-tp12216p14266.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Dropping Java 7 support

Timo Walther-2
Hurray! Finally IntStreams, LongStreams, etc. in our stream processor ;-)

Timo

Am 18.07.17 um 16:31 schrieb Stephan Ewen:

> Hi all!
>
> Over the last days, there was a longer poll running concerning dropping the
> support for Java 7.
>
> The feedback from users was unanimous - in favor of dropping Java 7 and
> going ahead with Java 8.
>
> So let's do that!
>
> Greetings,
> Stephan
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> Date: Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ?
> To: user <[hidden email]>
>
>
> All right, thanks everyone.
>
> I think the consensus here is clear :-)
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:17 PM, nragon <[hidden email]
>> wrote:
>> +1 dropping java 7
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-maili
>> ng-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/POLL-Who-still-uses
>> -Java-7-with-Flink-tp12216p14266.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive
>> at Nabble.com.
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Dropping Java 7 support

Chesnay Schepler-3
Are the specific things we want to change right away? (build profiles
would be one thing)

Would be neat to collect them in an umbrella issue.

On 18.07.2017 16:49, Timo Walther wrote:

> Hurray! Finally IntStreams, LongStreams, etc. in our stream processor ;-)
>
> Timo
>
> Am 18.07.17 um 16:31 schrieb Stephan Ewen:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Over the last days, there was a longer poll running concerning
>> dropping the
>> support for Java 7.
>>
>> The feedback from users was unanimous - in favor of dropping Java 7 and
>> going ahead with Java 8.
>>
>> So let's do that!
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Stephan
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>> Date: Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ?
>> To: user <[hidden email]>
>>
>>
>> All right, thanks everyone.
>>
>> I think the consensus here is clear :-)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:17 PM, nragon
>> <[hidden email]
>>> wrote:
>>> +1 dropping java 7
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-maili
>>> ng-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/POLL-Who-still-uses
>>> -Java-7-with-Flink-tp12216p14266.html
>>> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list
>>> archive
>>> at Nabble.com.
>>>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Dropping Java 7 support

Eron Wright-2
Opened FLINK-7242 as an umbrella issue for this.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Are the specific things we want to change right away? (build profiles
> would be one thing)
>
> Would be neat to collect them in an umbrella issue.
>
>
> On 18.07.2017 16:49, Timo Walther wrote:
>
>> Hurray! Finally IntStreams, LongStreams, etc. in our stream processor ;-)
>>
>> Timo
>>
>> Am 18.07.17 um 16:31 schrieb Stephan Ewen:
>>
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> Over the last days, there was a longer poll running concerning dropping
>>> the
>>> support for Java 7.
>>>
>>> The feedback from users was unanimous - in favor of dropping Java 7 and
>>> going ahead with Java 8.
>>>
>>> So let's do that!
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>>> Date: Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:29 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ?
>>> To: user <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>
>>> All right, thanks everyone.
>>>
>>> I think the consensus here is clear :-)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:17 PM, nragon <nuno.goncalves@wedotechnologi
>>> es.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> +1 dropping java 7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-maili
>>>> ng-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/POLL-Who-still-uses
>>>> -Java-7-with-Flink-tp12216p14266.html
>>>> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list
>>>> archive
>>>> at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Dropping Java 7 support

Eron Wright-2
I don't see a ticket for updating Akka to 2.4+, or I'd link it to
FLINK-7242.  Should I open an umbrella for that?  Separate question is
whether we'd shoot for 2.4 or 2.5.

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Eron Wright <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Opened FLINK-7242 as an umbrella issue for this.
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Are the specific things we want to change right away? (build profiles
>> would be one thing)
>>
>> Would be neat to collect them in an umbrella issue.
>>
>>
>> On 18.07.2017 16:49, Timo Walther wrote:
>>
>>> Hurray! Finally IntStreams, LongStreams, etc. in our stream processor ;-)
>>>
>>> Timo
>>>
>>> Am 18.07.17 um 16:31 schrieb Stephan Ewen:
>>>
>>>> Hi all!
>>>>
>>>> Over the last days, there was a longer poll running concerning dropping
>>>> the
>>>> support for Java 7.
>>>>
>>>> The feedback from users was unanimous - in favor of dropping Java 7 and
>>>> going ahead with Java 8.
>>>>
>>>> So let's do that!
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Stephan
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>>>> Date: Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:29 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ?
>>>> To: user <[hidden email]>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All right, thanks everyone.
>>>>
>>>> I think the consensus here is clear :-)
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:17 PM, nragon <nuno.goncalves@wedotechnologi
>>>> es.com
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1 dropping java 7
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-maili
>>>>> ng-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/POLL-Who-still-uses
>>>>> -Java-7-with-Flink-tp12216p14266.html
>>>>> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list
>>>>> archive
>>>>> at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Dropping Java 7 support

Greg Hogan
I recently came across FLINK-3662 when debugging TaskManager timeouts but I’d go for opening a new ticket rather than re-opening an old ticket. It does link to FLINK-2821 and some work-in-progress depending on Akka 2.4+ so Robert and others may be able to pick this back up if still relevant.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3662 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3662>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821>


> On Jul 21, 2017, at 8:34 PM, Eron Wright <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I don't see a ticket for updating Akka to 2.4+, or I'd link it to
> FLINK-7242.  Should I open an umbrella for that?  Separate question is
> whether we'd shoot for 2.4 or 2.5.
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Eron Wright <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Opened FLINK-7242 as an umbrella issue for this.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Are the specific things we want to change right away? (build profiles
>>> would be one thing)
>>>
>>> Would be neat to collect them in an umbrella issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18.07.2017 16:49, Timo Walther wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hurray! Finally IntStreams, LongStreams, etc. in our stream processor ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Timo
>>>>
>>>> Am 18.07.17 um 16:31 schrieb Stephan Ewen:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>
>>>>> Over the last days, there was a longer poll running concerning dropping
>>>>> the
>>>>> support for Java 7.
>>>>>
>>>>> The feedback from users was unanimous - in favor of dropping Java 7 and
>>>>> going ahead with Java 8.
>>>>>
>>>>> So let's do that!
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> Stephan
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Date: Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:29 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [POLL] Who still uses Java 7 with Flink ?
>>>>> To: user <[hidden email]>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All right, thanks everyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the consensus here is clear :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:17 PM, nragon <nuno.goncalves@wedotechnologi
>>>>> es.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 dropping java 7
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-maili
>>>>>> ng-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/POLL-Who-still-uses
>>>>>> -Java-7-with-Flink-tp12216p14266.html
>>>>>> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list
>>>>>> archive
>>>>>> at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>