Drafting the 0.9.0 release announcement

[mxm]

Hi everyone,

With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the
milestone release announcement with a few changes.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x

Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.

Best,
Max

[Márton Balassi]

Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit differently,
updating it.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the
> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
>
> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
>
> Best,
> Max
>

[Timo Walther-2]

Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about it
or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section?

On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:

> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit differently,
> updating it.
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the
>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
>>
>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
>>
>> Best,
>> Max
>>

[Robert Metzger]

I would add a separate paragraph about it!

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about it
> or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section?
>
>
> On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit
>> differently,
>> updating it.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
>>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the
>>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
>>>
>>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Max
>>>
>>>
>

[Stephan Ewen]

I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I would add a separate paragraph about it!
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about it
> > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section?
> >
> >
> > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit
> >> differently,
> >> updating it.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>  Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
> >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the
> >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> >>>
> >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Max
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>

[mxm]

Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are published
on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass and
publish the announcement.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about
> it
> > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit
> > >> differently,
> > >> updating it.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  Hi everyone,
> > >>>
> > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
> > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the
> > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> > >>>
> > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Max
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>

[Aljoscha Krettek-2]

I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery".

On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are published
> on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
> announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass and
> publish the announcement.
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph about
> > it
> > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit
> > > >> differently,
> > > >> updating it.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>  Hi everyone,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
> > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains the
> > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Max
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Stephan Ewen]

I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.

I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a link
for details for those interested in the details.


On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery".
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
> published
> > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
> > announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass and
> > publish the announcement.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph
> about
> > > it
> > > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit
> > > > >> differently,
> > > > >> updating it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>  Hi everyone,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the release
> > > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains
> the
> > > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best,
> > > > >>> Max
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[Stephan Ewen]

I like the announcement now.

Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not yet
performance optimized.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
>
> I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
> points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a link
> for details for those interested in the details.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery".
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
>> published
>> > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
>> > announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass and
>> > publish the announcement.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph
>> about
>> > > it
>> > > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes" section?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit
>> > > > >> differently,
>> > > > >> updating it.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
>> [hidden email]
>> > >
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>  Hi everyone,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
>> release
>> > > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains
>> the
>> > > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Best,
>> > > > >>> Max
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

[Vasiliki Kalavri]

Hi,

thank you Max for the nice document!
Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?

-Vasia.

On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I like the announcement now.
>
> Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
> versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not yet
> performance optimized.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
> >
> > I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
> > points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a link
> > for details for those interested in the details.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery".
> >>
> >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
> >> published
> >> > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
> >> > announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass
> and
> >> > publish the announcement.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
> [hidden email]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <[hidden email]
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a paragraph
> >> about
> >> > > it
> >> > > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
> section?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a bit
> >> > > > >> differently,
> >> > > > >> updating it.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> >> [hidden email]
> >> > >
> >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>  Hi everyone,
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
> >> release
> >> > > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically contains
> >> the
> >> > > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Best,
> >> > > > >>> Max
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

[mxm]

Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document quite
a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false
impression to people reading the release announcement because the real
issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of JIRA
issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this is
reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO is
not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the known
issues section.

I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The website is
already set up for the 0.9.0.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thank you Max for the nice document!
> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?
>
> -Vasia.
>
> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I like the announcement now.
> >
> > Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
> > versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not yet
> > performance optimized.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
> > >
> > > I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
> > > points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a
> link
> > > for details for those interested in the details.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> [hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery".
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
> > >> published
> > >> > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
> > >> > announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass
> > and
> > >> > publish the announcement.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a
> paragraph
> > >> about
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
> > section?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a
> bit
> > >> > > > >> differently,
> > >> > > > >> updating it.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>  Hi everyone,
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
> > >> release
> > >> > > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically
> contains
> > >> the
> > >> > > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>> Best,
> > >> > > > >>> Max
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >>>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

[mxm]

I've published the announcement:
http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html

Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the word!

Cheers,
Max

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document quite
> a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false
> impression to people reading the release announcement because the real
> issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of JIRA
> issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this is
> reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO is
> not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the known
> issues section.
>
> I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The website is
> already set up for the 0.9.0.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you Max for the nice document!
>> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?
>>
>> -Vasia.
>>
>> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > I like the announcement now.
>> >
>> > Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
>> > versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not yet
>> > performance optimized.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
>> > >
>> > > I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
>> > > points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a
>> link
>> > > for details for those interested in the details.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> [hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of *recovery".
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
>> > >> published
>> > >> > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
>> > >> > announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final pass
>> > and
>> > >> > publish the announcement.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
>> > [hidden email]>
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <
>> [hidden email]
>> > >
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a
>> paragraph
>> > >> about
>> > >> > > it
>> > >> > > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
>> > section?
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a
>> bit
>> > >> > > > >> differently,
>> > >> > > > >> updating it.
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
>> > >> [hidden email]
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > > >>  Hi everyone,
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
>> > >> release
>> > >> > > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically
>> contains
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>> Best,
>> > >> > > > >>> Max
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

[Stephan Ewen]

Great that this release is out, finally :-)

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I've published the announcement:
>
> http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html
>
> Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the word!
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document
> quite
> > a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false
> > impression to people reading the release announcement because the real
> > issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of JIRA
> > issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this is
> > reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO is
> > not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the known
> > issues section.
> >
> > I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The website is
> > already set up for the 0.9.0.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> thank you Max for the nice document!
> >> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?
> >>
> >> -Vasia.
> >>
> >> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I like the announcement now.
> >> >
> >> > Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
> >> > versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not
> yet
> >> > performance optimized.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
> >> > >
> >> > > I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
> >> > > points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a
> >> link
> >> > > for details for those interested in the details.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> >> [hidden email]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of
> *recovery".
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
> >> > >> published
> >> > >> > on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
> >> > >> > announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final
> pass
> >> > and
> >> > >> > publish the announcement.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
> >> > [hidden email]>
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <
> >> [hidden email]
> >> > >
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a
> >> paragraph
> >> > >> about
> >> > >> > > it
> >> > >> > > > > or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
> >> > section?
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a
> >> bit
> >> > >> > > > >> differently,
> >> > >> > > > >> updating it.
> >> > >> > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> >> > >> [hidden email]
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > >>  Hi everyone,
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
> >> > >> release
> >> > >> > > > >>> announcement. I've created a document which basically
> >> contains
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> > > > >>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >>> Best,
> >> > >> > > > >>> Max
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

[Chiwan Park-2]

Great! We should post the announcement mail to user mailing list :)

Regards,
Chiwan Park

> On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Great that this release is out, finally :-)
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I've published the announcement:
>>
>> http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html
>>
>> Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the word!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Max
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document
>> quite
>>> a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false
>>> impression to people reading the release announcement because the real
>>> issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of JIRA
>>> issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this is
>>> reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO is
>>> not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the known
>>> issues section.
>>>
>>> I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The website is
>>> already set up for the 0.9.0.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> thank you Max for the nice document!
>>>> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?
>>>>
>>>> -Vasia.
>>>>
>>>> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I like the announcement now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
>>>>> versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not
>> yet
>>>>> performance optimized.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
>>>>>> points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a
>>>> link
>>>>>> for details for those interested in the details.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of
>> *recovery".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
>>>>>>> published
>>>>>>>> on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
>>>>>>>> announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final
>> pass
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> publish the announcement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would add a separate paragraph about it!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a
>>>> paragraph
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
>>>>> section?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a
>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>>> differently,
>>>>>>>>>>>> updating it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement. I've created a document which basically
>>>> contains
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

[mxm]

I'm so happy we have pushed it out :) It took a while but I think we can be
very pleased with the result.

I will post an announcement to the user/dev and the Apache announce mailing
list.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Chiwan Park <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Great! We should post the announcement mail to user mailing list :)
>
> Regards,
> Chiwan Park
>
> > On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Great that this release is out, finally :-)
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I've published the announcement:
> >>
> >>
> http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html
> >>
> >> Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the word!
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Max
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document
> >> quite
> >>> a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false
> >>> impression to people reading the release announcement because the real
> >>> issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of JIRA
> >>> issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this
> is
> >>> reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO
> is
> >>> not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the
> known
> >>> issues section.
> >>>
> >>> I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The website
> is
> >>> already set up for the 0.9.0.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> thank you Max for the nice document!
> >>>> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Vasia.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I like the announcement now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
> >>>>> versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not
> >> yet
> >>>>> performance optimized.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
> >>>>>> points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post a
> >>>> link
> >>>>>> for details for those interested in the details.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> >>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of
> >> *recovery".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts are
> >>>>>>> published
> >>>>>>>> on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
> >>>>>>>> announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final
> >> pass
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> publish the announcement.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
> >>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <
> >>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a
> >>>> paragraph
> >>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>> or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
> >>>>> section?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a
> >>>> bit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> differently,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> updating it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
> >>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement. I've created a document which basically
> >>>> contains
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Max
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>

[Till Rohrmann]

We should ping the Zeppelin guys to update their Flink dependency.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm so happy we have pushed it out :) It took a while but I think we can be
> very pleased with the result.
>
> I will post an announcement to the user/dev and the Apache announce mailing
> list.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Chiwan Park <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Great! We should post the announcement mail to user mailing list :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chiwan Park
> >
> > > On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Great that this release is out, finally :-)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've published the announcement:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/06/24/announcing-apache-flink-0.9.0-release.html
> > >>
> > >> Let me know if anything is not right. Otherwise, please spread the
> word!
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Max
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks for your feedback. We managed to improve the initial document
> > >> quite
> > >>> a bit. The thing about the known issues is that it might give a false
> > >>> impression to people reading the release announcement because the
> real
> > >>> issues we are working on, can hardly be summarized by a couple of
> JIRA
> > >>> issues. Of course we will fix those JIRA issues (and I made sure this
> > is
> > >>> reflected in JIRA) but the right place for keeping track of them IMHO
> > is
> > >>> not the release announcement. With that in mind, I have removed the
> > known
> > >>> issues section.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm converting the document to markdown now to publish it. The
> website
> > is
> > >>> already set up for the 0.9.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> thank you Max for the nice document!
> > >>>> Can we please add FLINK-2271 to the list of known issues?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Vasia.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 24 June 2015 at 13:08, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I like the announcement now.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Would like to add a note to Gelly and Flink ML that these are early
> > >>>>> versions of the libraries, that they are subject to changes and not
> > >> yet
> > >>>>> performance optimized.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I reworked the text on streaming fault tolerance.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I think the release announcement needs to be about the core
> > >>>>>> points/improvements, rather than have many exact details. We post
> a
> > >>>> link
> > >>>>>> for details for those interested in the details.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I fixed a typo in the state checkpoint text: "In case *of
> > >> *recovery".
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 at 10:34 Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for your contributions. Now that the release artifacts
> are
> > >>>>>>> published
> > >>>>>>>> on the Maven repositories, I would like to get out the release
> > >>>>>>>> announcement. If nobody has anything to add, I will do a final
> > >> pass
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>> publish the announcement.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I also like a separate paragraph about it :-)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Robert Metzger <
> > >>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I would add a separate paragraph about it!
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Timo Walther <
> > >>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Is the static code analysis thing worth it to write a
> > >>>> paragraph
> > >>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>> or is better located in the "More Improvements and Fixes"
> > >>>>> section?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 23.06.2015 14:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Max. I would like to present the streaming stuff a
> > >>>> bit
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> differently,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> updating it.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> With the vote now being passed, we should think about the
> > >>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement. I've created a document which basically
> > >>>> contains
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> milestone release announcement with a few changes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5H0q961Ucvu6fR56RleY4oN4YFqmeGkN77XPPsco3k/edit#heading=h.5fiopdwccz0x
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please feel free to make your comments and adjustments.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Max
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
>