Hi,
I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for verifying if a vote is binding or not. Best, Dawid signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
Hi Dawid,
Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly applies to me. It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be enforced but serves a general guideline. Thanks, Xuefu On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think > whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate > or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. > > It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if > we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for > verifying if a vote is binding or not. > > Best, > > Dawid > > > -- Xuefu Zhang "In Honey We Trust!" |
Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion.
+1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to send email. Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. Best, Jingsong Lee On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Dawid, > > Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you > described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email > address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly > applies to me. > > It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying > either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be > enforced but serves a general guideline. > > Thanks, > Xuefu > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think > > whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate > > or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. > > > > It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if > > we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for > > verifying if a vote is binding or not. > > > > Best, > > > > Dawid > > > > > > > > -- > Xuefu Zhang > > "In Honey We Trust!" > -- Best, Jingsong Lee |
Thanks Dawid for start this discussion.
I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still non-binding. Thanks, Dian > 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee <[hidden email]> 写道: > > Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. > > +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. > I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to > send email. > > Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". > Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. > In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Dawid, >> >> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you >> described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email >> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly >> applies to me. >> >> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying >> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be >> enforced but serves a general guideline. >> >> Thanks, >> Xuefu >> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think >>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate >>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. >>> >>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if >>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for >>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Dawid >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Xuefu Zhang >> >> "In Honey We Trust!" >> > > > -- > Best, Jingsong Lee |
Hi all, Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion.
What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an
apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the
votes can check in the apache directory if a person with that
address is a committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a
committer uses a different address there is no way to check if
that person is a committer/PMC or not. It does not mean though
that if you vote from apache.org this vote is automatically
binding. It just allows us to check if it is. To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to
use an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a
committer or not. But take me (or any other committer) for
example. If I use my non-apache address for a vote and the person
verifying the vote does not know me and my address, it is not easy
for that person to verify if I am a committer or not. Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer (we might don't know your other address). I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. I hope this clears it up a bit. Best, Dawid On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote:
Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still non-binding. Thanks, Dian在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee [hidden email] 写道: Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to send email. Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. Best, Jingsong Lee On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z [hidden email] wrote:Hi Dawid, Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly applies to me. It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be enforced but serves a general guideline. Thanks, Xuefu On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz [hidden email] wrote:Hi, I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for verifying if a vote is binding or not. Best, Dawid-- Xuefu Zhang "In Honey We Trust!"-- Best, Jingsong Lee signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
Hi Dawid,
Thanks for you explanation. You mean that "people who vote for binding +1 need to use apache email addresses". Although I can't vote binding +1, I am +1 for this suggestion. Best, Jingsong Lee On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first > clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion. > > 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as > binding > 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org > address from voting > 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs > > What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an apache.org > address because then the person that summarizes the votes can check in the > apache directory if a person with that address is a committer/PMC in flink > project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different address there is no way > to check if that person is a committer/PMC or not. It does not mean though > that if you vote from apache.org this vote is automatically binding. It > just allows us to check if it is. > > To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use an > apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer or > not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my > non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not > know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am a > committer or not. > > Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You can > vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as non-binding. > This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. However if you > are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote will be > non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer (we might > don't know your other address). > > I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote helps, > but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. > > I hope this clears it up a bit. > > Best, > > Dawid > On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: > > Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. > > I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still non-binding. > > Thanks, > Dian > > > 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> 写道: > > Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. > > +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. > I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to > send email. > > Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". > Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. > In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi Dawid, > > Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you > described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email > address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly > applies to me. > > It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying > either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be > enforced but serves a general guideline. > > Thanks, > Xuefu > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think > whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate > or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. > > It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if > we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for > verifying if a vote is binding or not. > > Best, > > Dawid > > > > > -- > Xuefu Zhang > > "In Honey We Trust!" > > > -- > Best, Jingsong Lee > > -- Best, Jingsong Lee |
In reply to this post by dwysakowicz
I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1.
On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: > > Hi all, > > Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me > first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial > suggestion. > > 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as binding > 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org > address from voting > 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs > > What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an > apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes > can check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a > committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a > different address there is no way to check if that person is a > committer/PMC or not. It does not mean though that if you vote from > apache.org this vote is automatically binding. It just allows us to > check if it is. > > To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use > an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a > committer or not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If > I use my non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the > vote does not know me and my address, it is not easy for that person > to verify if I am a committer or not. > > Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You > can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as > non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. > However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your > vote will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a > committer (we might don't know your other address). > > I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote > helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. > > I hope this clears it up a bit. > > Best, > > Dawid > > On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: >> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. >> >> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still non-binding. >> >> Thanks, >> Dian >> >>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: >>> >>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. >>> >>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. >>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to >>> send email. >>> >>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". >>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. >>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. >>> >>> Best, >>> Jingsong Lee >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dawid, >>>> >>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you >>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email >>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly >>>> applies to me. >>>> >>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying >>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be >>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Xuefu >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz<[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think >>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate >>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. >>>>> >>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if >>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for >>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Dawid >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Xuefu Zhang >>>> >>>> "In Honey We Trust!" >>>> >>> -- >>> Best, Jingsong Lee |
Very sensible! +1
> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1. > > On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion. >> >> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as binding >> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org >> address from voting >> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs >> >> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes can check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different address there is no way to check if that person is a committer/PMC or not. It does not mean though that if you vote from apache.org this vote is automatically binding. It just allows us to check if it is. >> >> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer or not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am a committer or not. >> >> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer (we might don't know your other address). >> >> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. >> >> I hope this clears it up a bit. >> >> Best, >> >> Dawid >> >> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: >>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. >>> >>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still non-binding. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dian >>> >>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: >>>> >>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. >>>> >>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. >>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to >>>> send email. >>>> >>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". >>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. >>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Jingsong Lee >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dawid, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you >>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email >>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly >>>>> applies to me. >>>>> >>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying >>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be >>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Xuefu >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz<[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think >>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate >>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if >>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for >>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Dawid >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Xuefu Zhang >>>>> >>>>> "In Honey We Trust!" >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best, Jingsong Lee > > |
Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1.
Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC accidentally votes using the non apache email, even if the person who summarizes the votes clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still be counted as non-binding? Regards, Dian > 在 2019年12月4日,下午5:13,Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道: > > Very sensible! +1 > >> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1. >> >> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion. >>> >>> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as binding >>> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org >>> address from voting >>> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs >>> >>> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes can check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different address there is no way to check if that person is a committer/PMC or not. It does not mean though that if you vote from apache.org this vote is automatically binding. It just allows us to check if it is. >>> >>> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer or not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am a committer or not. >>> >>> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer (we might don't know your other address). >>> >>> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. >>> >>> I hope this clears it up a bit. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Dawid >>> >>> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: >>>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. >>>> >>>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still non-binding. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dian >>>> >>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. >>>>> >>>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. >>>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to >>>>> send email. >>>>> >>>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". >>>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. >>>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Jingsong Lee >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Dawid, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you >>>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email >>>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly >>>>>> applies to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying >>>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be >>>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Xuefu >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz<[hidden email]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think >>>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate >>>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if >>>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for >>>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dawid >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Xuefu Zhang >>>>>> >>>>>> "In Honey We Trust!" >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee >> >> > |
Hi Dian,
I don't want to be very strict, but I think it should be counted as non-binding, if it comes from non apache address, yes. Anybody should be able to verify a vote. Moreover I think this the only way to "encourage" all committers to use their apache addresses ;) Best, Dawid On 04/12/2019 10:26, Dian Fu wrote: > Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1. > > Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC accidentally votes using the non apache email, even if the person who summarizes the votes clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still be counted as non-binding? > > Regards, > Dian > >> 在 2019年12月4日,下午5:13,Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道: >> >> Very sensible! +1 >> >>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1. >>> >>> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion. >>>> >>>> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as binding >>>> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org >>>> address from voting >>>> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs >>>> >>>> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes can check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different address there is no way to check if that person is a committer/PMC or not. It does not mean though that if you vote from apache.org this vote is automatically binding. It just allows us to check if it is. >>>> >>>> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer or not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am a committer or not. >>>> >>>> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer (we might don't know your other address). >>>> >>>> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. >>>> >>>> I hope this clears it up a bit. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Dawid >>>> >>>> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: >>>>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. >>>>> >>>>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is still non-binding. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dian >>>>> >>>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. >>>>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email address to >>>>>> send email. >>>>>> >>>>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain "binding". >>>>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. >>>>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any suffix too. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Jingsong Lee >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Dawid, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you >>>>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org email >>>>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This certainly >>>>>>> applies to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by specifying >>>>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot be >>>>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Xuefu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz<[hidden email]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think >>>>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release candidate >>>>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email address. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a committer/PMC if >>>>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important for >>>>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dawid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Xuefu Zhang >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "In Honey We Trust!" >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee >>> signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
I'm +1 on this proposal.
Regarding to the case that Dian mentioned, we can reminder the committer/PMC to vote again use the apache email, and of course the non-apache vote is counted as non-binding. Best, Jark On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 17:33, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Dian, > > I don't want to be very strict, but I think it should be counted as > non-binding, if it comes from non apache address, yes. > > Anybody should be able to verify a vote. Moreover I think this the only > way to "encourage" all committers to use their apache addresses ;) > > Best, > > Dawid > > On 04/12/2019 10:26, Dian Fu wrote: > > Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1. > > > > Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC > accidentally votes using the non apache email, even if the person who > summarizes the votes clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still be > counted as non-binding? > > > > Regards, > > Dian > > > >> 在 2019年12月4日,下午5:13,Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道: > >> > >> Very sensible! +1 > >> > >>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1. > >>> > >>> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me > first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial suggestion. > >>>> > >>>> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as > binding > >>>> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org > >>>> address from voting > >>>> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs > >>>> > >>>> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an > apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes can > check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a > committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different > address there is no way to check if that person is a committer/PMC or not. > It does not mean though that if you vote from apache.org this vote is > automatically binding. It just allows us to check if it is. > >>>> > >>>> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use > an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer or > not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my > non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not > know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am a > committer or not. > >>>> > >>>> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You > can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as > non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. > However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote > will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer > (we might don't know your other address). > >>>> > >>>> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote > helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. > >>>> > >>>> I hope this clears it up a bit. > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> > >>>> Dawid > >>>> > >>>> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: > >>>>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, > according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from > active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email > address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it is > still non-binding. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Dian > >>>>> > >>>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. > >>>>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email > address to > >>>>>> send email. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain > "binding". > >>>>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. > >>>>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any > suffix too. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> Jingsong Lee > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Dawid, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem you > >>>>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an apache.org > >>>>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This > certainly > >>>>>>> applies to me. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by > specifying > >>>>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this cannot > be > >>>>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Xuefu > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz< > [hidden email]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I think > >>>>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release > candidate > >>>>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email > address. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a > committer/PMC if > >>>>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important > for > >>>>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Dawid > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Xuefu Zhang > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "In Honey We Trust!" > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee > >>> > > |
+1 (from my apache email ;-))
Best, Kurt On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:22 PM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'm +1 on this proposal. > > Regarding to the case that Dian mentioned, we can reminder the > committer/PMC to vote again use the apache email, > and of course the non-apache vote is counted as non-binding. > > Best, > Jark > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 17:33, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Hi Dian, > > > > I don't want to be very strict, but I think it should be counted as > > non-binding, if it comes from non apache address, yes. > > > > Anybody should be able to verify a vote. Moreover I think this the only > > way to "encourage" all committers to use their apache addresses ;) > > > > Best, > > > > Dawid > > > > On 04/12/2019 10:26, Dian Fu wrote: > > > Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1. > > > > > > Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC > > accidentally votes using the non apache email, even if the person who > > summarizes the votes clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still be > > counted as non-binding? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dian > > > > > >> 在 2019年12月4日,下午5:13,Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道: > > >> > > >> Very sensible! +1 > > >> > > >>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1. > > >>> > > >>> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: > > >>>> Hi all, > > >>>> > > >>>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me > > first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial > suggestion. > > >>>> > > >>>> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as > > binding > > >>>> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org > > >>>> address from voting > > >>>> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs > > >>>> > > >>>> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an > > apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes can > > check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a > > committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different > > address there is no way to check if that person is a committer/PMC or > not. > > It does not mean though that if you vote from apache.org this vote is > > automatically binding. It just allows us to check if it is. > > >>>> > > >>>> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use > > an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer > or > > not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my > > non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not > > know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am > a > > committer or not. > > >>>> > > >>>> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You > > can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as > > non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. > > However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote > > will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer > > (we might don't know your other address). > > >>>> > > >>>> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote > > helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. > > >>>> > > >>>> I hope this clears it up a bit. > > >>>> > > >>>> Best, > > >>>> > > >>>> Dawid > > >>>> > > >>>> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: > > >>>>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, > > according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from > > active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email > > address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it > is > > still non-binding. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> Dian > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. > > >>>>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email > > address to > > >>>>>> send email. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain > > "binding". > > >>>>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. > > >>>>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any > > suffix too. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>> Jingsong Lee > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi Dawid, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem > you > > >>>>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an > apache.org > > >>>>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This > > certainly > > >>>>>>> applies to me. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by > > specifying > > >>>>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this > cannot > > be > > >>>>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>> Xuefu > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz< > > [hidden email]> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I > think > > >>>>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release > > candidate > > >>>>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email > > address. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a > > committer/PMC if > > >>>>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important > > for > > >>>>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Dawid > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Xuefu Zhang > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> "In Honey We Trust!" > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee > > >>> > > > > > |
Hi Dawid,
Thanks for the reply. Counting all the votes from non apache addresses as non-binding makes sense. Just as Jark mentioned, we can always remind the committer/PMC to vote again to use the apache address if necessary (i.e. when the number of binding votes is not enough). Thanks, Dian > 在 2019年12月4日,下午7:27,Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道: > > +1 (from my apache email ;-)) > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:22 PM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I'm +1 on this proposal. >> >> Regarding to the case that Dian mentioned, we can reminder the >> committer/PMC to vote again use the apache email, >> and of course the non-apache vote is counted as non-binding. >> >> Best, >> Jark >> >> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 17:33, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dian, >>> >>> I don't want to be very strict, but I think it should be counted as >>> non-binding, if it comes from non apache address, yes. >>> >>> Anybody should be able to verify a vote. Moreover I think this the only >>> way to "encourage" all committers to use their apache addresses ;) >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Dawid >>> >>> On 04/12/2019 10:26, Dian Fu wrote: >>>> Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1. >>>> >>>> Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC >>> accidentally votes using the non apache email, even if the person who >>> summarizes the votes clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still be >>> counted as non-binding? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dian >>>> >>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,下午5:13,Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道: >>>>> >>>>> Very sensible! +1 >>>>> >>>>>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me >>> first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial >> suggestion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as >>> binding >>>>>>> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org >>>>>>> address from voting >>>>>>> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an >>> apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes can >>> check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a >>> committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a different >>> address there is no way to check if that person is a committer/PMC or >> not. >>> It does not mean though that if you vote from apache.org this vote is >>> automatically binding. It just allows us to check if it is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to use >>> an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer >> or >>> not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my >>> non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does not >>> know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I am >> a >>> committer or not. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. You >>> can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as >>> non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. >>> However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your vote >>> will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a committer >>> (we might don't know your other address). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote >>> helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hope this clears it up a bit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dawid >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, >>> according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from >>> active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email >>> address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it >> is >>> still non-binding. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Dian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. >>>>>>>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email >>> address to >>>>>>>>> send email. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain >>> "binding". >>>>>>>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. >>>>>>>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any >>> suffix too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Jingsong Lee >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Dawid, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem >> you >>>>>>>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an >> apache.org >>>>>>>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This >>> certainly >>>>>>>>>> applies to me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by >>> specifying >>>>>>>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this >> cannot >>> be >>>>>>>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Xuefu >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz< >>> [hidden email]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I >> think >>>>>>>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release >>> candidate >>>>>>>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email >>> address. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a >>> committer/PMC if >>>>>>>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important >>> for >>>>>>>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dawid >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Xuefu Zhang >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "In Honey We Trust!" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee >>>>>> >>> >>> >> |
+1 for the proposal.
Cheers, Till On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:43 PM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Dawid, > > Thanks for the reply. Counting all the votes from non apache addresses as > non-binding makes sense. Just as Jark mentioned, we can always remind the > committer/PMC to vote again to use the apache address if necessary (i.e. > when the number of binding votes is not enough). > > Thanks, > Dian > > > 在 2019年12月4日,下午7:27,Kurt Young <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > +1 (from my apache email ;-)) > > > > Best, > > Kurt > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:22 PM Jark Wu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> I'm +1 on this proposal. > >> > >> Regarding to the case that Dian mentioned, we can reminder the > >> committer/PMC to vote again use the apache email, > >> and of course the non-apache vote is counted as non-binding. > >> > >> Best, > >> Jark > >> > >> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 17:33, Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Dian, > >>> > >>> I don't want to be very strict, but I think it should be counted as > >>> non-binding, if it comes from non apache address, yes. > >>> > >>> Anybody should be able to verify a vote. Moreover I think this the only > >>> way to "encourage" all committers to use their apache addresses ;) > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> Dawid > >>> > >>> On 04/12/2019 10:26, Dian Fu wrote: > >>>> Thanks for your explanation Dawid! It makes sense to me now. +1. > >>>> > >>>> Just one minor question: Does this mean that if a committer/PMC > >>> accidentally votes using the non apache email, even if the person who > >>> summarizes the votes clearly KNOWS who he/she is, that vote will still > be > >>> counted as non-binding? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Dian > >>>> > >>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,下午5:13,Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> 写道: > >>>>> > >>>>> Very sensible! +1 > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 4. Dec 2019, at 10:02, Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I believe this to be a sensible approach by Dawid; +1. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 04/12/2019 09:04, Dawid Wysakowicz wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sorry I think I was not clear enough on my initial e-mail. Let me > >>> first clarify two things and later on try to rephrase my initial > >> suggestion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1. I do not want to count all votes from @apache.org addresses as > >>> binding > >>>>>>> 2. I do not want to discourage people that do not have @apache.org > >>>>>>> address from voting > >>>>>>> 3. What I said does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMCs > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> What I meant is that if you are a committer/PMC please use an > >>> apache.org address because then the person that summarizes the votes > can > >>> check in the apache directory if a person with that address is a > >>> committer/PMC in flink project. Otherwise if a committer uses a > different > >>> address there is no way to check if that person is a committer/PMC or > >> not. > >>> It does not mean though that if you vote from apache.org this vote is > >>> automatically binding. It just allows us to check if it is. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> To elaborate on Xuefu's example. It's absolutely fine for you to > use > >>> an apache address for voting. I will still check if you are a committer > >> or > >>> not. But take me (or any other committer) for example. If I use my > >>> non-apache address for a vote and the person verifying the vote does > not > >>> know me and my address, it is not easy for that person to verify if I > am > >> a > >>> committer or not. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Also it does not mean that other people are not allowed to vote. > You > >>> can vote from other addresses, but those votes will be counted as > >>> non-binding. This does not change anything for non-committers/non-PMC. > >>> However if you are a committer and vote from non apache address your > vote > >>> will be non-binding, because we cannot verify you are indeed a > committer > >>> (we might don't know your other address). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I agree the additional information (binding, non-binding) in a vote > >>> helps, but it still should be verified. People make mistakes. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I hope this clears it up a bit. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dawid > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 04/12/2019 04:58, Dian Fu wrote: > >>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid for start this discussion. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I have the same feeling with Xuefu and Jingsong. Besides that, > >>> according to the bylaws, for some kinds of votes, only the votes from > >>> active PMC members are binding, such as product release. So an email > >>> address doesn't help here. Even if a vote is from a Flink committer, it > >> is > >>> still non-binding. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> Dian > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 在 2019年12月4日,上午10:37,Jingsong Lee<[hidden email]> 写道: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid for driving this discussion. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 to Xuefu's viewpoint. > >>>>>>>>> I am not a Flink committer, but sometimes I use apache email > >>> address to > >>>>>>>>> send email. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Another way is that we require the binding ticket to must contain > >>> "binding". > >>>>>>>>> Otherwise it must be a "non-binding" ticket. > >>>>>>>>> In this way, we can let lazy people continue voting without any > >>> suffix too. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>> Jingsong Lee > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 AM Xuefu Z<[hidden email]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Dawid, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for initiating this discussion. I understand the problem > >> you > >>>>>>>>>> described, but the solution might not work as having an > >> apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> address doesn't necessary mean it's from a Flink committer. This > >>> certainly > >>>>>>>>>> applies to me. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It probably helps for the voters to identify themselves by > >>> specifying > >>>>>>>>>> either "binding" or "non-binding", though I understand this > >> cannot > >>> be > >>>>>>>>>> enforced but serves a general guideline. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Xuefu > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:15 AM Dawid Wysakowicz< > >>> [hidden email]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to reach out primarily to the Flink's committers. I > >> think > >>>>>>>>>>> whenever we cast a vote on a proposal, is it a FLIP, release > >>> candidate > >>>>>>>>>>> or any other proposal, we should use our apache.org email > >>> address. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> It is not an easy task to check if a person voting is a > >>> committer/PMC if > >>>>>>>>>>> we do not work with him/her on a daily basis. This is important > >>> for > >>>>>>>>>>> verifying if a vote is binding or not. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Dawid > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Xuefu Zhang > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> "In Honey We Trust!" > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee > >>>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |