[DISCUSS] Release Flink 1.0.3

[Robert Metzger]

Hi,

in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues for the
next bugfix release.

I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate and start
a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.

Fixes to be included:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701

Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.

[mxm]

Hi Robert,

Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.

FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
release. I would like to add
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796

Cheers,
Max

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues for the
> next bugfix release.
>
> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate and start
> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>
> Fixes to be included:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>
> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.

[Kostas Kloudas]

I am working on: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
which I believe will also affect:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796

Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.

> On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
>
> FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
> release. I would like to add
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues for the
>> next bugfix release.
>>
>> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate and start
>> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>>
>> Fixes to be included:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>>
>> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.

[Aljoscha Krettek-2]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect the 1.0.x
series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2 release
thread.

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I am working on:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
> which I believe will also affect:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>
> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
>
> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
> >
> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
> > release. I would like to add
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Max
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues for the
> >> next bugfix release.
> >>
> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate and
> start
> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
> >>
> >> Fixes to be included:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
> >>
> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
>
>

[Ufuk Celebi-2]

Hey all,

thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.

- FLINK-3790 is merged
- FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
- FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes

After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for 1.0.3.

Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues have
been resolved?

– Ufuk


On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]> wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect the 1.0.x
> series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2 release
> thread.
>
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> I am working on:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
>> which I believe will also affect:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>>
>> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
>>
>> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Robert,
>> >
>> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
>> >
>> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
>> > release. I would like to add
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Max
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues for the
>> >> next bugfix release.
>> >>
>> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate and
>> start
>> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes to be included:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>> >>
>> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
>>
>>

[Robert Metzger]

I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found this
issue quite annoying: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678

In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
Any objections?

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
>
> - FLINK-3790 is merged
> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
>
> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for 1.0.3.
>
> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues have
> been resolved?
>
> – Ufuk
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect the
> 1.0.x
> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2 release
> > thread.
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I am working on:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
> >> which I believe will also affect:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
> >>
> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
> >>
> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Robert,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
> >> >
> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
> >> > release. I would like to add
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Max
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues for
> the
> >> >> next bugfix release.
> >> >>
> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate and
> >> start
> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
> >> >>
> >> >> Fixes to be included:
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
> >> >>
> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
> >>
> >>
>

[Ufuk Celebi-2]

+1 from my side, Robert. It's not changing anything for people who
don't configure it. We also did it for 1.0.2 with the DataSetUtils.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found this
> issue quite annoying: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678
>
> In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
> Any objections?
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
>>
>> - FLINK-3790 is merged
>> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
>> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
>>
>> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for 1.0.3.
>>
>> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues have
>> been resolved?
>>
>> – Ufuk
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect the
>> 1.0.x
>> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2 release
>> > thread.
>> >
>> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am working on:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
>> >> which I believe will also affect:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>> >>
>> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
>> >>
>> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Robert,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
>> >> >
>> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
>> >> > release. I would like to add
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> > Max
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues for
>> the
>> >> >> next bugfix release.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate and
>> >> start
>> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Fixes to be included:
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
>> >>
>> >>
>>

[Robert Metzger]

Okay, I'll merge it

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 from my side, Robert. It's not changing anything for people who
> don't configure it. We also did it for 1.0.2 with the DataSetUtils.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found this
> > issue quite annoying: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678
> >
> > In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
> > Any objections?
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
> >>
> >> - FLINK-3790 is merged
> >> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
> >> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
> >>
> >> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for 1.0.3.
> >>
> >> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues have
> >> been resolved?
> >>
> >> – Ufuk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect the
> >> 1.0.x
> >> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2
> release
> >> > thread.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <
> [hidden email]
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I am working on:
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
> >> >> which I believe will also affect:
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
> >> >>
> >> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi Robert,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
> >> >> > release. I would like to add
> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cheers,
> >> >> > Max
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <
> [hidden email]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues
> for
> >> the
> >> >> >> next bugfix release.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate
> and
> >> >> start
> >> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Fixes to be included:
> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

[Ufuk Celebi-2]

I think FLINK-3803 can be included as well for 1.0.3 (checkpoint stats
tracker configuration was not picked up).

The PR is here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1927

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Okay, I'll merge it
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 from my side, Robert. It's not changing anything for people who
>> don't configure it. We also did it for 1.0.2 with the DataSetUtils.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found this
>> > issue quite annoying: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678
>> >
>> > In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
>> > Any objections?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey all,
>> >>
>> >> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
>> >>
>> >> - FLINK-3790 is merged
>> >> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
>> >> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
>> >>
>> >> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for 1.0.3.
>> >>
>> >> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues have
>> >> been resolved?
>> >>
>> >> – Ufuk
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect the
>> >> 1.0.x
>> >> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2
>> release
>> >> > thread.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <
>> [hidden email]
>> >> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I am working on:
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
>> >> >> which I believe will also affect:
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi Robert,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
>> >> >> > release. I would like to add
>> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Cheers,
>> >> >> > Max
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <
>> [hidden email]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues
>> for
>> >> the
>> >> >> >> next bugfix release.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate
>> and
>> >> >> start
>> >> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Fixes to be included:
>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>

[Ufuk Celebi-2]

The issues mentioned in this thread have been resolved now. Are there
any other fixes you want in for 1.0.3?

– Ufuk

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think FLINK-3803 can be included as well for 1.0.3 (checkpoint stats
> tracker configuration was not picked up).
>
> The PR is here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1927
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Okay, I'll merge it
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from my side, Robert. It's not changing anything for people who
>>> don't configure it. We also did it for 1.0.2 with the DataSetUtils.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found this
>>> > issue quite annoying: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678
>>> >
>>> > In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
>>> > Any objections?
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hey all,
>>> >>
>>> >> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
>>> >>
>>> >> - FLINK-3790 is merged
>>> >> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
>>> >> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
>>> >>
>>> >> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for 1.0.3.
>>> >>
>>> >> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues have
>>> >> been resolved?
>>> >>
>>> >> – Ufuk
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]
>>> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect the
>>> >> 1.0.x
>>> >> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2
>>> release
>>> >> > thread.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <
>>> [hidden email]
>>> >> >
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> I am working on:
>>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
>>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
>>> >> >> which I believe will also affect:
>>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Hi Robert,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
>>> >> >> > release. I would like to add
>>> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Cheers,
>>> >> >> > Max
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> Hi,
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting issues
>>> for
>>> >> the
>>> >> >> >> next bugfix release.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions separate
>>> and
>>> >> >> start
>>> >> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Fixes to be included:
>>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
>>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
>>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>>

[Fabian Hueske-2]

I have an easy fix for FLINK-3835 coming up.
It's not an urgent fix but if you wait for 1h it is in.

2016-04-27 14:57 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>:

> The issues mentioned in this thread have been resolved now. Are there
> any other fixes you want in for 1.0.3?
>
> – Ufuk
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > I think FLINK-3803 can be included as well for 1.0.3 (checkpoint stats
> > tracker configuration was not picked up).
> >
> > The PR is here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1927
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> Okay, I'll merge it
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 from my side, Robert. It's not changing anything for people who
> >>> don't configure it. We also did it for 1.0.2 with the DataSetUtils.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found
> this
> >>> > issue quite annoying:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678
> >>> >
> >>> > In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
> >>> > Any objections?
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Hey all,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> - FLINK-3790 is merged
> >>> >> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
> >>> >> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
> >>> >>
> >>> >> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for 1.0.3.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues have
> >>> >> been resolved?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> – Ufuk
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> [hidden email]
> >>> >
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not affect
> the
> >>> >> 1.0.x
> >>> >> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2
> >>> release
> >>> >> > thread.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> I am working on:
> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
> >>> >> >> which I believe will also affect:
> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <
> [hidden email]>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Hi Robert,
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming 1.1.0
> >>> >> >> > release. I would like to add
> >>> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Cheers,
> >>> >> >> > Max
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <
> >>> [hidden email]>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> Hi,
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting
> issues
> >>> for
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> next bugfix release.
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions
> separate
> >>> and
> >>> >> >> start
> >>> >> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> Fixes to be included:
> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
>

[Fabian Hueske-2]

Just pushed the fix.

2016-04-27 15:16 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>:

> I have an easy fix for FLINK-3835 coming up.
> It's not an urgent fix but if you wait for 1h it is in.
>
> 2016-04-27 14:57 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>:
>
>> The issues mentioned in this thread have been resolved now. Are there
>> any other fixes you want in for 1.0.3?
>>
>> – Ufuk
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > I think FLINK-3803 can be included as well for 1.0.3 (checkpoint stats
>> > tracker configuration was not picked up).
>> >
>> > The PR is here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1927
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >> Okay, I'll merge it
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +1 from my side, Robert. It's not changing anything for people who
>> >>> don't configure it. We also did it for 1.0.2 with the DataSetUtils.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
>> >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found
>> this
>> >>> > issue quite annoying:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678
>> >>> >
>> >>> > In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
>> >>> > Any objections?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Hey all,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> - FLINK-3790 is merged
>> >>> >> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
>> >>> >> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for
>> 1.0.3.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues
>> have
>> >>> >> been resolved?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> – Ufuk
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> [hidden email]
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not
>> affect the
>> >>> >> 1.0.x
>> >>> >> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2
>> >>> release
>> >>> >> > thread.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <
>> >>> [hidden email]
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> I am working on:
>> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
>> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
>> >>> >> >> which I believe will also affect:
>> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <
>> [hidden email]>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > Hi Robert,
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming
>> 1.1.0
>> >>> >> >> > release. I would like to add
>> >>> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > Cheers,
>> >>> >> >> > Max
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <
>> >>> [hidden email]>
>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting
>> issues
>> >>> for
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> next bugfix release.
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions
>> separate
>> >>> and
>> >>> >> >> start
>> >>> >> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> Fixes to be included:
>> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
>> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
>> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>>
>
>

[Ufuk Celebi-2]

Thanks to everyone who participated in the discussion. I'm now going
to trigger the first RC.

Aljoscha also merged another commit into release-1.0 for the RocksDB
state backend.

– Ufuk

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Just pushed the fix.
>
> 2016-04-27 15:16 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]>:
>
>> I have an easy fix for FLINK-3835 coming up.
>> It's not an urgent fix but if you wait for 1h it is in.
>>
>> 2016-04-27 14:57 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> The issues mentioned in this thread have been resolved now. Are there
>>> any other fixes you want in for 1.0.3?
>>>
>>> – Ufuk
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > I think FLINK-3803 can be included as well for 1.0.3 (checkpoint stats
>>> > tracker configuration was not picked up).
>>> >
>>> > The PR is here: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1927
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Okay, I'll merge it
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> +1 from my side, Robert. It's not changing anything for people who
>>> >>> don't configure it. We also did it for 1.0.2 with the DataSetUtils.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]
>>> >
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> > I'm currently working on the Flink+Bigtop integration and I found
>>> this
>>> >>> > issue quite annoying:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3678
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > In my opinion its a bugfix we can include into the release.
>>> >>> > Any objections?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> Hey all,
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> thanks to Robert for starting the discussion.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> - FLINK-3790 is merged
>>> >>> >> - FLINK-3800 looks good to merge after a test issue is resolved
>>> >>> >> - FLINK-3701 needs some feedback on the latest changes
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> After we have resolved these, I can kick off the first RC for
>>> 1.0.3.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Are there any other fixes we want in after the mentioned issues
>>> have
>>> >>> >> been resolved?
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> – Ufuk
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>>> [hidden email]
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>> >>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701 does not
>>> affect the
>>> >>> >> 1.0.x
>>> >>> >> > series of releases, I think we also discussed this in the 1.0.2
>>> >>> release
>>> >>> >> > thread.
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 at 10:39 Kostas Kloudas <
>>> >>> [hidden email]
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > wrote:
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> I am working on:
>>> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1 <
>>> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2314?filter=-1>
>>> >>> >> >> which I believe will also affect:
>>> >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Essentially the FileSourceFunction will become obsolete.
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> > On Apr 22, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Maximilian Michels <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> > Hi Robert,
>>> >>> >> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> > Thanks for starting a new thread for Flink 1.0.3.
>>> >>> >> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> > FLINK-3701 can be removed. It's only affects the upcoming
>>> 1.1.0
>>> >>> >> >> > release. I would like to add
>>> >>> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3796
>>> >>> >> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> > Cheers,
>>> >>> >> >> > Max
>>> >>> >> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Robert Metzger <
>>> >>> [hidden email]>
>>> >>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> >> Hi,
>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> >> in the 1.0.2 release thread we started already collecting
>>> issues
>>> >>> for
>>> >>> >> the
>>> >>> >> >> >> next bugfix release.
>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> >> I think it would be helpful to keep the two discussions
>>> separate
>>> >>> and
>>> >>> >> >> start
>>> >>> >> >> >> a new thread for the 1.0.3 rel.
>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> >> Fixes to be included:
>>> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3790
>>> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3800
>>> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3701
>>> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> >> Please add more JIRAs to the list if you have some.
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>
>>