Thanks everyone for the feedback! Since there haven't been any
questions/discussions, I'll be moving this to a vote thread next week.
Regards
Ingo
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:36 PM JING ZHANG <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks Ingo for starting this discussion.
>
>
>
> Big +1 for this feature. Looking forward to the feature.
>
>
> Best regards,
> JING ZHANG
>
> Jark Wu <
[hidden email]> 于2021年6月15日周二 下午3:48写道：
>
> > Thanks Ingo for picking up this FLIP.
> >
> > FLIP-129 is an important piece to have a complete Table SQL story,
> > and users have been waiting for a long time. Let's finish it in this
> > release!
> > Your proposed changes look good to me.
> >
> > I also cc'd people who voted in previous FLIP-129.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 19:46, Ingo Bürk <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > we would like to pick up work on FLIP-129 which aims to improve the
> Table
> > > API by supporting the creation of sources / sinks without having to go
> > > through SQL/DDL. This FLIP was approved a while ago, and some things
> have
> > > changed since then. We'd like to propose a few changes, see [1], before
> > > starting work on it.
> > > Our proposal is mainly motivated by reducing the scope in some parts to
> > > improve maintainability and relying more on ConfigOptions being the
> > single
> > > source of truth. We also want to expose this functionality for
> > > non-temporary tables.
> > >
> > > We'd like to open this for discussion to collect any feedback. Once the
> > > discussion has stabilized I'll update the FLIP itself and start a new
> > vote.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tpirvF0u723QF005UrgdbvF-Tp0Jbg_qhlbda4mk7Ck/edit?usp=sharing> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ingo
> > >
> >
>
Locked
