Hi all!
I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature freeze for 1.11. When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end of April, which would be in one week. I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be helpful to have two additional weeks. When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there are more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of development speed here and there. How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? Best, Stephan |
Hi Stephan,
As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could use of the extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m involved with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. Piotrek > On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi all! > > I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature freeze > for 1.11. > > When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end of > April, which would be in one week. > > I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be helpful > to have two additional weeks. > > When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there are > more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of > development speed here and there. > > How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > Best, > Stephan |
+1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th.
Cheers, Till On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could use of the > extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m involved > with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > > +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > Piotrek > > > On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature > freeze > > for 1.11. > > > > When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end of > > April, which would be in one week. > > > > I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > > reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be helpful > > to have two additional weeks. > > > > When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there > are > > more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of > > development speed here and there. > > > > How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > > > Best, > > Stephan > > |
+1
Aljoscha On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Stephan, >> >> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could use of the >> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m involved >> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. >> >> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. >> >> Piotrek >> >>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature >> freeze >>> for 1.11. >>> >>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end of >>> April, which would be in one week. >>> >>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, >>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be helpful >>> to have two additional weeks. >>> >>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there >> are >>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. >>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of >>> development speed here and there. >>> >>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? >>> >>> Best, >>> Stephan >> >> > |
From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit
from extending the feature freeze. Thanks, Timo On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > +1 > > Aljoscha > > On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: >> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Stephan, >>> >>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could use >>> of the >>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m >>> involved >>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. >>> >>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. >>> >>> Piotrek >>> >>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature >>> freeze >>>> for 1.11. >>>> >>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to >>>> end of >>>> April, which would be in one week. >>>> >>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, >>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be >>>> helpful >>>> to have two additional weeks. >>>> >>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there >>> are >>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. >>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of >>>> development speed here and there. >>>> >>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Stephan >>> >>> >> |
+1
From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, for pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes deployment. Thank you~ Xintong Song On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote: > From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit > from extending the feature freeze. > > Thanks, > Timo > > On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > +1 > > > > Aljoscha > > > > On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > >> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Stephan, > >>> > >>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could use > >>> of the > >>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m > >>> involved > >>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > >>> > >>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > >>> > >>> Piotrek > >>> > >>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all! > >>>> > >>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature > >>> freeze > >>>> for 1.11. > >>>> > >>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to > >>>> end of > >>>> April, which would be in one week. > >>>> > >>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > >>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be > >>>> helpful > >>>> to have two additional weeks. > >>>> > >>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that > there > >>> are > >>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > >>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of > >>>> development speed here and there. > >>>> > >>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Stephan > >>> > >>> > >> > > |
+1
Thanks, Jark On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, for > pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes > deployment. > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit > > from extending the feature freeze. > > > > Thanks, > > Timo > > > > On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > >> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Till > > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Stephan, > > >>> > > >>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could use > > >>> of the > > >>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m > > >>> involved > > >>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > > >>> > > >>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > >>> > > >>> Piotrek > > >>> > > >>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi all! > > >>>> > > >>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature > > >>> freeze > > >>>> for 1.11. > > >>>> > > >>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to > > >>>> end of > > >>>> April, which would be in one week. > > >>>> > > >>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > > >>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be > > >>>> helpful > > >>>> to have two additional weeks. > > >>>> > > >>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that > > there > > >>> are > > >>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > >>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit > of > > >>>> development speed here and there. > > >>>> > > >>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > >>>> > > >>>> Best, > > >>>> Stephan > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > |
+1 for extending the code freeze date.
FLIP-119 could benefit from it. May 15th sounds reasonable. Thanks, Zhu Zhu Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2020年4月24日周五 上午12:01写道: > +1 > > Thanks, > Jark > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > +1 > > From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, > for > > pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes > > deployment. > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit > > > from extending the feature freeze. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Timo > > > > > > On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > >> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> Till > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email] > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi Stephan, > > > >>> > > > >>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could use > > > >>> of the > > > >>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m > > > >>> involved > > > >>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > > > >>> > > > >>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > >>> > > > >>> Piotrek > > > >>> > > > >>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hi all! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the > feature > > > >>> freeze > > > >>>> for 1.11. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to > > > >>>> end of > > > >>>> April, which would be in one week. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > > > >>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be > > > >>>> helpful > > > >>>> to have two additional weeks. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that > > > there > > > >>> are > > > >>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > > >>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a > bit > > of > > > >>>> development speed here and there. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Best, > > > >>>> Stephan > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > |
+1
Best, Jingsong Lee On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:27 AM Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 for extending the code freeze date. > FLIP-119 could benefit from it. > May 15th sounds reasonable. > > Thanks, > Zhu Zhu > > Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2020年4月24日周五 上午12:01写道: > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Jark > > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, > > for > > > pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes > > > deployment. > > > > > > Thank you~ > > > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit > > > > from extending the feature freeze. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Timo > > > > > > > > On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > > > On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > > >> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > > >> > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > >> Till > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski < > [hidden email] > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Hi Stephan, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could > use > > > > >>> of the > > > > >>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m > > > > >>> involved > > > > >>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Piotrek > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Hi all! > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the > > feature > > > > >>> freeze > > > > >>>> for 1.11. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date > to > > > > >>>> end of > > > > >>>> April, which would be in one week. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, > FLIP-115, > > > > >>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would > be > > > > >>>> helpful > > > > >>>> to have two additional weeks. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is > that > > > > there > > > > >>> are > > > > >>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > > > >>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a > > bit > > > of > > > > >>>> development speed here and there. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Best, > > > > >>>> Stephan > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best, Jingsong Lee |
+ 1 for the feature freeze date
Best, Leonard Xu > 在 2020年4月24日,09:32,Jingsong Li <[hidden email]> 写道: > > +1 > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:27 AM Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> +1 for extending the code freeze date. >> FLIP-119 could benefit from it. >> May 15th sounds reasonable. >> >> Thanks, >> Zhu Zhu >> >> Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2020年4月24日周五 上午12:01写道: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jark >>> >>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, >>> for >>>> pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes >>>> deployment. >>>> >>>> Thank you~ >>>> >>>> Xintong Song >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit >>>>> from extending the feature freeze. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Timo >>>>> >>>>> On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Aljoscha >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: >>>>>>> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Till >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski < >> [hidden email] >>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Stephan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could >> use >>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m >>>>>>>> involved >>>>>>>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Piotrek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the >>> feature >>>>>>>> freeze >>>>>>>>> for 1.11. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date >> to >>>>>>>>> end of >>>>>>>>> April, which would be in one week. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, >> FLIP-115, >>>>>>>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would >> be >>>>>>>>> helpful >>>>>>>>> to have two additional weeks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is >> that >>>>> there >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. >>>>>>>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a >>> bit >>>> of >>>>>>>>> development speed here and there. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Stephan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > Best, Jingsong Lee |
+1
Regards, Dian > 在 2020年4月24日,上午9:47,Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > + 1 for the feature freeze date > > Best, > Leonard Xu > > >> 在 2020年4月24日,09:32,Jingsong Li <[hidden email]> 写道: >> >> +1 >> >> Best, >> Jingsong Lee >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:27 AM Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> +1 for extending the code freeze date. >>> FLIP-119 could benefit from it. >>> May 15th sounds reasonable. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Zhu Zhu >>> >>> Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2020年4月24日周五 上午12:01写道: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jark >>>> >>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, >>>> for >>>>> pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes >>>>> deployment. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you~ >>>>> >>>>> Xintong Song >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit >>>>>> from extending the feature freeze. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Timo >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Aljoscha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: >>>>>>>> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski < >>> [hidden email] >>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Stephan, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could >>> use >>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m >>>>>>>>> involved >>>>>>>>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Piotrek >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the >>>> feature >>>>>>>>> freeze >>>>>>>>>> for 1.11. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date >>> to >>>>>>>>>> end of >>>>>>>>>> April, which would be in one week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, >>> FLIP-115, >>>>>>>>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would >>> be >>>>>>>>>> helpful >>>>>>>>>> to have two additional weeks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is >>> that >>>>>> there >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. >>>>>>>>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a >>>> bit >>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> development speed here and there. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> Stephan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best, Jingsong Lee > |
+1
Best, Yangze Guo On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > +1 > > Regards, > Dian > > > 在 2020年4月24日,上午9:47,Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > + 1 for the feature freeze date > > > > Best, > > Leonard Xu > > > > > >> 在 2020年4月24日,09:32,Jingsong Li <[hidden email]> 写道: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Best, > >> Jingsong Lee > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:27 AM Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 for extending the code freeze date. > >>> FLIP-119 could benefit from it. > >>> May 15th sounds reasonable. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Zhu Zhu > >>> > >>> Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2020年4月24日周五 上午12:01写道: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Jark > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, > >>>> for > >>>>> pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes > >>>>> deployment. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you~ > >>>>> > >>>>> Xintong Song > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit > >>>>>> from extending the feature freeze. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Timo > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Aljoscha > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > >>>>>>>> +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski < > >>> [hidden email] > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Stephan, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could > >>> use > >>>>>>>>> of the > >>>>>>>>> extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m > >>>>>>>>> involved > >>>>>>>>> with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Piotrek > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the > >>>> feature > >>>>>>>>> freeze > >>>>>>>>>> for 1.11. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date > >>> to > >>>>>>>>>> end of > >>>>>>>>>> April, which would be in one week. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, > >>> FLIP-115, > >>>>>>>>>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would > >>> be > >>>>>>>>>> helpful > >>>>>>>>>> to have two additional weeks. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is > >>> that > >>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > >>>>>>>>>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a > >>>> bit > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>> development speed here and there. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>> Stephan > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best, Jingsong Lee > > > |
+1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th.
Best, Danny Chan 在 2020年4月24日 +0800 AM9:51,Yangze Guo <[hidden email]>,写道: > +1 > > Best, > Yangze Guo > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Dian > > > > > 在 2020年4月24日,上午9:47,Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > + 1 for the feature freeze date > > > > > > Best, > > > Leonard Xu > > > > > > > > > > 在 2020年4月24日,09:32,Jingsong Li <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Jingsong Lee > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:27 AM Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for extending the code freeze date. > > > > > FLIP-119 could benefit from it. > > > > > May 15th sounds reasonable. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > > > > > Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2020年4月24日周五 上午12:01写道: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jark > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, > > > > > > for > > > > > > > pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes > > > > > > > deployment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit > > > > > > > > from extending the feature freeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Timo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski < > > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Stephan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > > > > extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m > > > > > > > > > > > involved > > > > > > > > > > > with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotrek > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the > > > > > > feature > > > > > > > > > > > freeze > > > > > > > > > > > > for 1.11. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > end of > > > > > > > > > > > > April, which would be in one week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, > > > > > FLIP-115, > > > > > > > > > > > > reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > helpful > > > > > > > > > > > > to have two additional weeks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is > > > > > that > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > > > > > > > > > > > The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a > > > > > > bit > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > development speed here and there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > Stephan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best, Jingsong Lee > > > > > |
+1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th.
Best, Zhijiang ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Danny Chan <[hidden email]> Send Time:2020 Apr. 24 (Fri.) 10:51 To:dev <[hidden email]> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Exact feature freeze date +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. Best, Danny Chan 在 2020年4月24日 +0800 AM9:51,Yangze Guo <[hidden email]>,写道: > +1 > > Best, > Yangze Guo > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Dian Fu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Dian > > > > > 在 2020年4月24日,上午9:47,Leonard Xu <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > + 1 for the feature freeze date > > > > > > Best, > > > Leonard Xu > > > > > > > > > > 在 2020年4月24日,09:32,Jingsong Li <[hidden email]> 写道: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Jingsong Lee > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:27 AM Zhu Zhu <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for extending the code freeze date. > > > > > FLIP-119 could benefit from it. > > > > > May 15th sounds reasonable. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > > > > > Jark Wu <[hidden email]> 于2020年4月24日周五 上午12:01写道: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jark > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Xintong Song <[hidden email]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > From our side we can also benefit from the extending of feature freeze, > > > > > > for > > > > > > > pluggable slot allocation, GPU support and perjob mode on Kubernetes > > > > > > > deployment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31 PM Timo Walther <[hidden email]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From the SQL side, I'm sure that FLIP-95 and FLIP-105 could benefit > > > > > > > > from extending the feature freeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Timo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23.04.20 16:11, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23.04.20 15:23, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:00 PM Piotr Nowojski < > > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Stephan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As release manager I’ve seen that quite a bit of features could > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > > > > extra couple of weeks. This also includes some features that I’m > > > > > > > > > > > involved > > > > > > > > > > > with, like FLIP-76, or limiting the in-flight buffers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 From my side for extending the feature freeze until May 15th. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotrek > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23 Apr 2020, at 10:10, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the > > > > > > feature > > > > > > > > > > > freeze > > > > > > > > > > > > for 1.11. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > end of > > > > > > > > > > > > April, which would be in one week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, > > > > > FLIP-115, > > > > > > > > > > > > reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > helpful > > > > > > > > > > > > to have two additional weeks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is > > > > > that > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > > > > > > > > > > > The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a > > > > > > bit > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > development speed here and there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > Stephan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best, Jingsong Lee > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Stephan Ewen
+1
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all! > > I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature freeze > for 1.11. > > When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end of > April, which would be in one week. > > I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be helpful > to have two additional weeks. > > When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there are > more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of > development speed here and there. > > How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > Best, > Stephan > |
+1 for extending the feature freeze to May 15th.
Best Regards, Yu On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature > freeze > > for 1.11. > > > > When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end of > > April, which would be in one week. > > > > I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > > reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be helpful > > to have two additional weeks. > > > > When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there > are > > more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of > > development speed here and there. > > > > How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > > > Best, > > Stephan > > > |
Hi,
Couple of contributors asked for extending cutting the release branch until Monday, what do you think about such extension? (+1 from my side) Piotrek > On 25 Apr 2020, at 21:24, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > +1 for extending the feature freeze to May 15th. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature >> freeze >>> for 1.11. >>> >>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end of >>> April, which would be in one week. >>> >>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, >>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be helpful >>> to have two additional weeks. >>> >>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there >> are >>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. >>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of >>> development speed here and there. >>> >>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? >>> >>> Best, >>> Stephan >>> >> |
I'm okay, but I would suggest to agree on a time of day. What about Monday
morning in Europe? On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:43 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Couple of contributors asked for extending cutting the release branch > until Monday, what do you think about such extension? > > (+1 from my side) > > Piotrek > > > On 25 Apr 2020, at 21:24, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > +1 for extending the feature freeze to May 15th. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all! > >>> > >>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature > >> freeze > >>> for 1.11. > >>> > >>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to end > of > >>> April, which would be in one week. > >>> > >>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > >>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be > helpful > >>> to have two additional weeks. > >>> > >>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that there > >> are > >>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > >>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit of > >>> development speed here and there. > >>> > >>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Stephan > >>> > >> > > |
+1 from my side extend the feature freeze until Monday morning.
Cheers, Till On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'm okay, but I would suggest to agree on a time of day. What about Monday > morning in Europe? > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:43 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Couple of contributors asked for extending cutting the release branch > > until Monday, what do you think about such extension? > > > > (+1 from my side) > > > > Piotrek > > > > > On 25 Apr 2020, at 21:24, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 for extending the feature freeze to May 15th. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi all! > > >>> > > >>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the feature > > >> freeze > > >>> for 1.11. > > >>> > > >>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to > end > > of > > >>> April, which would be in one week. > > >>> > > >>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > > >>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be > > helpful > > >>> to have two additional weeks. > > >>> > > >>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that > there > > >> are > > >>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > >>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit > of > > >>> development speed here and there. > > >>> > > >>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> Stephan > > >>> > > >> > > > > > |
+1 for Monday morning.
Best, Jingsong Lee On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:45 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 from my side extend the feature freeze until Monday morning. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > I'm okay, but I would suggest to agree on a time of day. What about > Monday > > morning in Europe? > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:43 PM Piotr Nowojski <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Couple of contributors asked for extending cutting the release branch > > > until Monday, what do you think about such extension? > > > > > > (+1 from my side) > > > > > > Piotrek > > > > > > > On 25 Apr 2020, at 21:24, Yu Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 for extending the feature freeze to May 15th. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Yuan Mei <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi all! > > > >>> > > > >>> I want to bring up a discussion about when we want to do the > feature > > > >> freeze > > > >>> for 1.11. > > > >>> > > > >>> When kicking off the release cycle, we tentatively set the date to > > end > > > of > > > >>> April, which would be in one week. > > > >>> > > > >>> I can say from the features I am involved with (FLIP-27, FLIP-115, > > > >>> reviewing some state backend improvements, etc.) that it would be > > > helpful > > > >>> to have two additional weeks. > > > >>> > > > >>> When looking at various other feature threads, my feeling is that > > there > > > >> are > > > >>> more contributors and committers that could use a few more days. > > > >>> The last two months were quite exceptional in and we did lose a bit > > of > > > >>> development speed here and there. > > > >>> > > > >>> How do you think about making *May 15th* the feature freeze? > > > >>> > > > >>> Best, > > > >>> Stephan > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- Best, Jingsong Lee |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |