|
Hello everyone,
I'm proposing to remove the connector for elasticsearch 1. The connector is used significantly less than more recent versions (2&5 are downloaded 4-5x more), and hasn't seen any development for over a hear, yet still incurred maintenance overhead due to licensing and testing. |
|
+1 for dropping elasticsearch 1 connector.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 5:10 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm proposing to remove the connector for elasticsearch 1. > > The connector is used significantly less than more recent versions (2&5 > are downloaded 4-5x more), and hasn't seen any development for over a > hear, yet still incurred maintenance overhead due to licensing and testing. > > > |
|
+1 to drop it
Previously released versions are still available and compatible with newer Flink versions anyways. On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:12 PM Bowen Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > +1 for dropping elasticsearch 1 connector. > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 5:10 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm proposing to remove the connector for elasticsearch 1. >> >> The connector is used significantly less than more recent versions (2&5 >> are downloaded 4-5x more), and hasn't seen any development for over a >> hear, yet still incurred maintenance overhead due to licensing and >> testing. >> >> >> |
|
+1 to drop it.
Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> 于2019年4月6日周六 上午6:51写道: > +1 to drop it > > Previously released versions are still available and compatible with newer > Flink versions anyways. > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:12 PM Bowen Li <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > +1 for dropping elasticsearch 1 connector. > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 5:10 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> I'm proposing to remove the connector for elasticsearch 1. > >> > >> The connector is used significantly less than more recent versions (2&5 > >> are downloaded 4-5x more), and hasn't seen any development for over a > >> hear, yet still incurred maintenance overhead due to licensing and > >> testing. > >> > >> > >> > |
|
In reply to this post by Chesnay Schepler-3
+1 to drop it.
Elasticsearch 1.x is already 5 years old, and is already highly discouraged to be used by the Elasticsearch community already. On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:10 PM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm proposing to remove the connector for elasticsearch 1. > > The connector is used significantly less than more recent versions (2&5 > are downloaded 4-5x more), and hasn't seen any development for over a > hear, yet still incurred maintenance overhead due to licensing and testing. > > > |
|
+1 to drop this kind of thing to mitigate maintenance effort.
Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <[hidden email]> 于2019年4月10日周三 下午2:17写道: > +1 to drop it. > > Elasticsearch 1.x is already 5 years old, and is already highly discouraged > to be used by the Elasticsearch community already. > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:10 PM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'm proposing to remove the connector for elasticsearch 1. > > > > The connector is used significantly less than more recent versions (2&5 > > are downloaded 4-5x more), and hasn't seen any development for over a > > hear, yet still incurred maintenance overhead due to licensing and > testing. > > > > > > > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
