Hey all!
I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since 0.9.0 there have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two were critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release urgently. What's do you think about this? --- If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release manager. JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to 0.9.1: FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last window FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync regarding Null-Values I propose the following to get the release going: 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide comments/fixes where appropriate. 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them with fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that should get into the release as well. I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a consensus about the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing started. – Ufuk [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 |
Thanks Ufuk for starting this discussion.
We should also go through the commit logs of the master branch and see if we forgot to cherry-pick some fixes over to the release-0.9 branch. I can do that and compile a list of potential fixes. Cheers, Fabian 2015-07-31 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>: > Hey all! > > I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since 0.9.0 there > have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two were > critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release urgently. > > What's do you think about this? > > --- > > If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release manager. > > JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to 0.9.1: > > FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer > FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys > FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last > window > FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync regarding > Null-Values > > I propose the following to get the release going: > > 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide comments/fixes where > appropriate. > > 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them with > fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that should get > into the release as well. > > I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a consensus about > the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing started. > > – Ufuk > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 > > |
Hi,
The following commits have been added to the release-0.9 branch since the 0.9.0 release: c7e8684 [FLINK-2229] Add equals() and hashCode() to ObjectArrayTypeInfo 451eb82 [FLINK-2280] GenericTypeComparator.compare() respects ascending flag acd4317 [FLINK-2353] Respect JobConfigurable interface in Hadoop mapred wrappers 055997e [docs] fix loading of style sheet with protocol relative base URL 7c2a704 [FLINK-2293] [runtime] Fix estimation for the number of hash buckets on recursive builds 0789460 [FLINK-2285] [streaming] Removed duplicate call in close from GroupedActiveDiscretizer d946599 [FLINK-2298] Add option to pass a custom name for Flink on YARN 9835625 [docs] fix broken links in FAQ 69f858e [FLINK-2257] [streaming] Properly forward rich window function calls to wrapped functions d7cfa55 [docs] correct baseurl for 0.9 documentation b5702c2 [docs] correct yarn command-line example 9f0da5b [FLINK-2262][utils] rename method for default integer value in ParameterTool I'd propose to add all of them to the 0.9.1 release. They contain important fixes and should thus be included in the minor release. As for the JIRA issues, it would be great to fix and include all of them. Except for "FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync regarding Null-Values" because we reverted null-value support for in the Table API for the 0.9.0 release. If the support on the master is fixed, we could include it again together with the fix for the RowSerializer and CaseClassComperator. Cheers, Max On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote: > Thanks Ufuk for starting this discussion. > > We should also go through the commit logs of the master branch and see if > we forgot to cherry-pick some fixes over to the release-0.9 branch. > I can do that and compile a list of potential fixes. > > Cheers, > Fabian > > 2015-07-31 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>: > > > Hey all! > > > > I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since 0.9.0 > there > > have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two were > > critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release > urgently. > > > > What's do you think about this? > > > > --- > > > > If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release manager. > > > > JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to 0.9.1: > > > > FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer > > FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys > > FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator > > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last > > window > > FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > regarding > > Null-Values > > > > I propose the following to get the release going: > > > > 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide comments/fixes > where > > appropriate. > > > > 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them with > > fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that should get > > into the release as well. > > > > I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a consensus > about > > the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing > started. > > > > – Ufuk > > > > [1] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 > > > > > |
Hi,
I did a (thin) fix for FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last window and also added a PR <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/994>. Regards, Gábor On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:07 AM Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > The following commits have been added to the release-0.9 branch since the > 0.9.0 release: > > c7e8684 [FLINK-2229] Add equals() and hashCode() to ObjectArrayTypeInfo > 451eb82 [FLINK-2280] GenericTypeComparator.compare() respects ascending > flag > acd4317 [FLINK-2353] Respect JobConfigurable interface in Hadoop mapred > wrappers > 055997e [docs] fix loading of style sheet with protocol relative base URL > 7c2a704 [FLINK-2293] [runtime] Fix estimation for the number of hash > buckets on recursive builds > 0789460 [FLINK-2285] [streaming] Removed duplicate call in close from > GroupedActiveDiscretizer > d946599 [FLINK-2298] Add option to pass a custom name for Flink on YARN > 9835625 [docs] fix broken links in FAQ > 69f858e [FLINK-2257] [streaming] Properly forward rich window function > calls to wrapped functions > d7cfa55 [docs] correct baseurl for 0.9 documentation > b5702c2 [docs] correct yarn command-line example > 9f0da5b [FLINK-2262][utils] rename method for default integer value in > ParameterTool > > I'd propose to add all of them to the 0.9.1 release. They contain important > fixes and should thus be included in the minor release. > > As for the JIRA issues, it would be great to fix and include all of them. > Except for > > "FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync regarding > Null-Values" > > because we reverted null-value support for in the Table API for the 0.9.0 > release. If the support on the master is fixed, we could include it again > together with the fix for the RowSerializer and CaseClassComperator. > > Cheers, > Max > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Thanks Ufuk for starting this discussion. > > > > We should also go through the commit logs of the master branch and see if > > we forgot to cherry-pick some fixes over to the release-0.9 branch. > > I can do that and compile a list of potential fixes. > > > > Cheers, > > Fabian > > > > 2015-07-31 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Hey all! > > > > > > I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since 0.9.0 > > there > > > have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two were > > > critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release > > urgently. > > > > > > What's do you think about this? > > > > > > --- > > > > > > If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release manager. > > > > > > JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to 0.9.1: > > > > > > FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer > > > FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys > > > FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator > > > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last > > > window > > > FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > > regarding > > > Null-Values > > > > > > I propose the following to get the release going: > > > > > > 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide comments/fixes > > where > > > appropriate. > > > > > > 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them with > > > fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that should > get > > > into the release as well. > > > > > > I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a consensus > > about > > > the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing > > started. > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 > > > > > > > > > |
I would like to release Flink 0.9.1 soon. There were some annoying bugs
discovered recently, that should be addressed in a bug fix release. I have the following bugs in my mind: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2555 (Hadoop Input/Output Formats are unable to access secured HDFS clusters) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2386 (Implement Kafka connector using the new Kafka Consumer API) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2543 (State handling does not support deserializing classes through the UserCodeClassloader) I'm working on providing a fix for FLINK-2543 asap (I have this particular bug already fixed, but my test is is triggering another one) On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I did a (thin) fix for > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last > window > > and also added a PR <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/994>. > > Regards, > Gábor > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:07 AM Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The following commits have been added to the release-0.9 branch since the > > 0.9.0 release: > > > > c7e8684 [FLINK-2229] Add equals() and hashCode() to ObjectArrayTypeInfo > > 451eb82 [FLINK-2280] GenericTypeComparator.compare() respects ascending > > flag > > acd4317 [FLINK-2353] Respect JobConfigurable interface in Hadoop mapred > > wrappers > > 055997e [docs] fix loading of style sheet with protocol relative base URL > > 7c2a704 [FLINK-2293] [runtime] Fix estimation for the number of hash > > buckets on recursive builds > > 0789460 [FLINK-2285] [streaming] Removed duplicate call in close from > > GroupedActiveDiscretizer > > d946599 [FLINK-2298] Add option to pass a custom name for Flink on YARN > > 9835625 [docs] fix broken links in FAQ > > 69f858e [FLINK-2257] [streaming] Properly forward rich window function > > calls to wrapped functions > > d7cfa55 [docs] correct baseurl for 0.9 documentation > > b5702c2 [docs] correct yarn command-line example > > 9f0da5b [FLINK-2262][utils] rename method for default integer value in > > ParameterTool > > > > I'd propose to add all of them to the 0.9.1 release. They contain > important > > fixes and should thus be included in the minor release. > > > > As for the JIRA issues, it would be great to fix and include all of them. > > Except for > > > > "FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > regarding > > Null-Values" > > > > because we reverted null-value support for in the Table API for the 0.9.0 > > release. If the support on the master is fixed, we could include it again > > together with the fix for the RowSerializer and CaseClassComperator. > > > > Cheers, > > Max > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Ufuk for starting this discussion. > > > > > > We should also go through the commit logs of the master branch and see > if > > > we forgot to cherry-pick some fixes over to the release-0.9 branch. > > > I can do that and compile a list of potential fixes. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Fabian > > > > > > 2015-07-31 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > Hey all! > > > > > > > > I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since 0.9.0 > > > there > > > > have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two > were > > > > critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release > > > urgently. > > > > > > > > What's do you think about this? > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release manager. > > > > > > > > JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to 0.9.1: > > > > > > > > FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer > > > > FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys > > > > FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator > > > > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the > last > > > > window > > > > FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > > > regarding > > > > Null-Values > > > > > > > > I propose the following to get the release going: > > > > > > > > 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide comments/fixes > > > where > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them > with > > > > fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that should > > get > > > > into the release as well. > > > > > > > > I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a consensus > > > about > > > > the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing > > > started. > > > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
I went over all issues and pinged a couple of people about open issues.
Thanks for all the help! All JIRA issues tagged with fixVersion 0.9.1 should now reflect the last state of the discussion. There is a related discussion about whether we want to release master as 0.9.1 (mod some changes). Please provide your feedback in that thread. That discussion is currently *not* blocking anything all all 0.9.1 fixes need to go into master as well at the moment. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> wrote: > I would like to release Flink 0.9.1 soon. There were some annoying bugs > discovered recently, that should be addressed in a bug fix release. > > I have the following bugs in my mind: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2555 (Hadoop Input/Output > Formats are unable to access secured HDFS clusters) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2386 (Implement Kafka > connector > using the new Kafka Consumer API) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2543 (State handling does not > support deserializing classes through the UserCodeClassloader) > > I'm working on providing a fix for FLINK-2543 asap (I have this particular > bug already fixed, but my test is is triggering another one) > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I did a (thin) fix for > > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last > > window > > > > and also added a PR <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/994>. > > > > Regards, > > Gábor > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:07 AM Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The following commits have been added to the release-0.9 branch since > the > > > 0.9.0 release: > > > > > > c7e8684 [FLINK-2229] Add equals() and hashCode() to ObjectArrayTypeInfo > > > 451eb82 [FLINK-2280] GenericTypeComparator.compare() respects ascending > > > flag > > > acd4317 [FLINK-2353] Respect JobConfigurable interface in Hadoop mapred > > > wrappers > > > 055997e [docs] fix loading of style sheet with protocol relative base > URL > > > 7c2a704 [FLINK-2293] [runtime] Fix estimation for the number of hash > > > buckets on recursive builds > > > 0789460 [FLINK-2285] [streaming] Removed duplicate call in close from > > > GroupedActiveDiscretizer > > > d946599 [FLINK-2298] Add option to pass a custom name for Flink on YARN > > > 9835625 [docs] fix broken links in FAQ > > > 69f858e [FLINK-2257] [streaming] Properly forward rich window function > > > calls to wrapped functions > > > d7cfa55 [docs] correct baseurl for 0.9 documentation > > > b5702c2 [docs] correct yarn command-line example > > > 9f0da5b [FLINK-2262][utils] rename method for default integer value in > > > ParameterTool > > > > > > I'd propose to add all of them to the 0.9.1 release. They contain > > important > > > fixes and should thus be included in the minor release. > > > > > > As for the JIRA issues, it would be great to fix and include all of > them. > > > Except for > > > > > > "FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > > regarding > > > Null-Values" > > > > > > because we reverted null-value support for in the Table API for the > 0.9.0 > > > release. If the support on the master is fixed, we could include it > again > > > together with the fix for the RowSerializer and CaseClassComperator. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Max > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Ufuk for starting this discussion. > > > > > > > > We should also go through the commit logs of the master branch and > see > > if > > > > we forgot to cherry-pick some fixes over to the release-0.9 branch. > > > > I can do that and compile a list of potential fixes. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Fabian > > > > > > > > 2015-07-31 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > Hey all! > > > > > > > > > > I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since > 0.9.0 > > > > there > > > > > have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two > > were > > > > > critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release > > > > urgently. > > > > > > > > > > What's do you think about this? > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release > manager. > > > > > > > > > > JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to > 0.9.1: > > > > > > > > > > FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer > > > > > FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys > > > > > FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator > > > > > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the > > last > > > > > window > > > > > FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync > > > > regarding > > > > > Null-Values > > > > > > > > > > I propose the following to get the release going: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide > comments/fixes > > > > where > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them > > with > > > > > fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that > should > > > get > > > > > into the release as well. > > > > > > > > > > I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a > consensus > > > > about > > > > > the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing > > > > started. > > > > > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
Hey all,
the artifacts are uploading at the moment. I will start a vote thread as soon as everything is up. :-) – Ufuk On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote: > I went over all issues and pinged a couple of people about open issues. > Thanks for all the help! All JIRA issues tagged with fixVersion 0.9.1 > should now reflect the last state of the discussion. > > There is a related discussion about whether we want to release master as > 0.9.1 (mod some changes). Please provide your feedback in that thread. > > That discussion is currently *not* blocking anything all all 0.9.1 fixes > need to go into master as well at the moment. > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Robert Metzger <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> I would like to release Flink 0.9.1 soon. There were some annoying bugs >> discovered recently, that should be addressed in a bug fix release. >> >> I have the following bugs in my mind: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2555 (Hadoop Input/Output >> Formats are unable to access secured HDFS clusters) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2386 (Implement Kafka >> connector >> using the new Kafka Consumer API) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2543 (State handling does not >> support deserializing classes through the UserCodeClassloader) >> >> I'm working on providing a fix for FLINK-2543 asap (I have this particular >> bug already fixed, but my test is is triggering another one) >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Hermann Gábor <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I did a (thin) fix for >> > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the last >> > window >> > >> > and also added a PR <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/994>. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Gábor >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:07 AM Maximilian Michels <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > The following commits have been added to the release-0.9 branch since >> the >> > > 0.9.0 release: >> > > >> > > c7e8684 [FLINK-2229] Add equals() and hashCode() to >> ObjectArrayTypeInfo >> > > 451eb82 [FLINK-2280] GenericTypeComparator.compare() respects >> ascending >> > > flag >> > > acd4317 [FLINK-2353] Respect JobConfigurable interface in Hadoop >> mapred >> > > wrappers >> > > 055997e [docs] fix loading of style sheet with protocol relative base >> URL >> > > 7c2a704 [FLINK-2293] [runtime] Fix estimation for the number of hash >> > > buckets on recursive builds >> > > 0789460 [FLINK-2285] [streaming] Removed duplicate call in close from >> > > GroupedActiveDiscretizer >> > > d946599 [FLINK-2298] Add option to pass a custom name for Flink on >> YARN >> > > 9835625 [docs] fix broken links in FAQ >> > > 69f858e [FLINK-2257] [streaming] Properly forward rich window function >> > > calls to wrapped functions >> > > d7cfa55 [docs] correct baseurl for 0.9 documentation >> > > b5702c2 [docs] correct yarn command-line example >> > > 9f0da5b [FLINK-2262][utils] rename method for default integer value in >> > > ParameterTool >> > > >> > > I'd propose to add all of them to the 0.9.1 release. They contain >> > important >> > > fixes and should thus be included in the minor release. >> > > >> > > As for the JIRA issues, it would be great to fix and include all of >> them. >> > > Except for >> > > >> > > "FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync >> > regarding >> > > Null-Values" >> > > >> > > because we reverted null-value support for in the Table API for the >> 0.9.0 >> > > release. If the support on the master is fixed, we could include it >> again >> > > together with the fix for the RowSerializer and CaseClassComperator. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Max >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Thanks Ufuk for starting this discussion. >> > > > >> > > > We should also go through the commit logs of the master branch and >> see >> > if >> > > > we forgot to cherry-pick some fixes over to the release-0.9 branch. >> > > > I can do that and compile a list of potential fixes. >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Fabian >> > > > >> > > > 2015-07-31 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]>: >> > > > >> > > > > Hey all! >> > > > > >> > > > > I want to start a discussion about the next 0.9 release. Since >> 0.9.0 >> > > > there >> > > > > have been 19 commits addressing 16 issues. Of these 16 issues, two >> > were >> > > > > critical issues regarding the runtime, which require a new release >> > > > urgently. >> > > > > >> > > > > What's do you think about this? >> > > > > >> > > > > --- >> > > > > >> > > > > If we agree about doing a new release, I can act as release >> manager. >> > > > > >> > > > > JIRA currently reports 5 open issues with "fix version" set to >> 0.9.1: >> > > > > >> > > > > FLINK-2450 IndexOutOfBoundsException in KryoSerializer >> > > > > FLINK-2442 PojoType fields not supported by field position keys >> > > > > FLINK-2356 Resource leak in checkpoint coordinator >> > > > > FLINK-2286 Window ParallelMerge sometimes swallows elements of the >> > last >> > > > > window >> > > > > FLINK-2236 RowSerializer and CaseClassComparator are not in sync >> > > > regarding >> > > > > Null-Values >> > > > > >> > > > > I propose the following to get the release going: >> > > > > >> > > > > 1. Please have a look at these issues [1] and provide >> comments/fixes >> > > > where >> > > > > appropriate. >> > > > > >> > > > > 2. Please open new issues (with fixes if you like ;)) and tag them >> > with >> > > > > fix version "0.9.1" if you think that there is something that >> should >> > > get >> > > > > into the release as well. >> > > > > >> > > > > I propose to do 1. and 2. for the next week. If there is a >> consensus >> > > > about >> > > > > the issues after next week, we can get the release process/testing >> > > > started. >> > > > > >> > > > > – Ufuk >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1 >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |